メニュー
Validate and analyze budgets for SCF Build Award submissions. Use when reviewing whether a submission's budget is proportional, justified, and well-structured based on patterns from 215 funded Build Awards.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Fetch external documents linked in SCF submissions — Google Docs, Google Drive PDFs, GitHub, Notion, IPFS. Use when a submission links to an architecture doc, whitepaper, or technical spec hosted externally. Handles URL transformation for Google services.
Analyze the competitive landscape for an SCF submission. Identifies similar projects on Stellar and other chains, assesses overlap and differentiation. Use when reviewing or drafting an SCF submission and you need to map similar projects on Stellar and other chains and articulate the differentiation.
Draft a strong SCF Interest Form submission. Use when a team needs help writing the Interest Form that determines whether they get invited to submit a full Build Award application. Covers project positioning, Stellar integration framing, team presentation, and the concise format the Interest Form requires.
Simulate the SCF team's manual prescreen on a Build Award submission — a completeness and eligibility check applied to every full submission before panel review. Checks completeness, Stellar integration, eligibility, budget issues, and common disqualifiers. Use when reviewing a draft Build Award submission for readiness before it goes to the SCF round.
Help teams prepare materials for an SCF referral. Use when a team wants to approach a referrer (SCF Pilot, SDF staff, alumni who completed deliverables, ambassador, or ecosystem partner) with a strong package that makes it easy for the referrer to evaluate and endorse them. Covers the referral form fields, what referrers assess, and how to present your project for referral.
Review Stellar Community Fund (SCF) Build Award applications. Use when evaluating SCF submissions, covering project fit assessment, technical architecture evaluation, team readiness, traction validation, budget analysis, and funding recommendations.
| name | scf-budget-builder |
| description | Validate and analyze budgets for SCF Build Award submissions. Use when reviewing whether a submission's budget is proportional, justified, and well-structured based on patterns from 215 funded Build Awards. |
Validates submission budgets against funded project benchmarks. Used during the review process to assess whether a budget is proportional to scope, properly broken down, and realistic.
| Category | Median | Middle 50% Range |
|---|---|---|
| Applications | $85,000 | $60K–$118K |
| Developer Tooling | $75,000 | $35K–$99K |
| Financial Protocols | $109,000 | $94K–$144K |
| Infrastructure | $116,000 | $62K–$143K |
| Role | Typical Range |
|---|---|
| Smart contract developer (Soroban/Rust) | $2,500–$5,000/week |
| Backend developer | $2,000–$4,000/week |
| Frontend developer | $1,500–$3,500/week |
| Full-stack developer | $2,000–$4,000/week |
| UI/UX designer | $1,500–$3,000/week |
| DevOps / infrastructure | $2,000–$4,000/week |
| Technical writer | $1,500–$2,500/week |
| Project management | $1,500–$2,500/week |
SCF Build Awards use a 10% / 20% / 30% / 40% tranche structure:
| Tranche | % of Total | Milestone |
|---|---|---|
| T0 | 10% | Automatic on award approval |
| T1 | 20% | MVP — core Stellar/Soroban integration |
| T2 | 30% | Testnet — full functionality, audit readiness |
| T3 | 40% | Mainnet — production launch, UX, documentation |
