メニュー
Architectural code analysis for design quality. Evaluates simplicity (Rich Hickey), functional core/imperative shell (Gary Bernhardt), and coupling (Constantine & Yourdon). Use for design review or architectural assessment.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Writes, edits, and creates dbt models following best practices. Use when user needs to create new dbt SQL models, update existing models, or convert raw SQL to dbt format. Handles staging, intermediate, and mart models with proper config blocks, CTEs, and documentation.
Apply Domain-Driven Design, Clean Architecture, CQRS, and command/query patterns to code reviews and feature design. Use when analyzing or designing code in Application, Service, Infrastructure, DataAccess, Validation, Domain, or Functions projects, or when addressing architectural concerns, layering, mapping, entities, value objects, repositories, or validators in the Rome Repair Order Service.
Analyzes and refactors code using Domain-Driven Design principles. Use when refactoring domain models, identifying DDD anti-patterns, improving domain clarity, or applying tactical/strategic DDD patterns.
Guide for DDD strategic design - analyzing domains through structured questioning, conducting stakeholder interviews (PM/domain experts/users), and producing Bounded Context analysis, Context Maps, and Ubiquitous Language. Use when user needs help understanding domain boundaries, planning domain interviews, or structuring DDD strategic artifacts.
Win competitive rounds: run a clean process, deliver value previews before asking, coordinate partners, and manage timelines. Use when you're trying to close a 'must win' deal against other funds.
End-to-end associate workflow with time-boxed gates: thesis -> sourcing -> meetings -> diligence -> memo, ending with either IC-ready memo or explicit kill decision. Use when you need to run the full pipeline for a sector or a specific deal.
| name | decomplect |
| description | Architectural code analysis for design quality. Evaluates simplicity (Rich Hickey), functional core/imperative shell (Gary Bernhardt), and coupling (Constantine & Yourdon). Use for design review or architectural assessment. |
Architectural analysis for design quality.
/decomplect # Run all 3 analyzers in parallel
/decomplect --simplicity # Specific analyzer
/decomplect --fcis # Specific analyzer
/decomplect --coupling # Specific analyzer
| Analyzer | Question |
|---|---|
| simplicity-analyzer | Is this truly simple or just easy? |
| fcis-analyzer | Is pure logic separated from I/O? |
| coupling-analyzer | Are modules well-separated? |
| Pillar | Focus |
|---|---|
| Simplicity | Values over state, decomplected concerns |
| FCIS | Functional core (pure), imperative shell (I/O) |
| Coupling | High cohesion, low coupling |
/unslopify - Tactical code cleanup (types, SRP, fail-fast)