メニュー
Simulate a tough but constructive peer review of an AI research artifact. Use when the user asks for a review, critique, feedback on a paper or draft, or wants to identify weaknesses before submission.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Search, read, and query research papers via the `alpha` CLI (alphaXiv-backed). Use when the user asks about academic papers, wants to find research on a topic, needs to read a specific paper, ask questions about a paper, inspect a paper's code repository, or manage paper annotations.
Autonomous experiment loop that tries ideas, measures results, keeps what works, and discards what doesn't. Use when the user asks to optimize a metric, run an experiment loop, improve performance iteratively, or automate benchmarking.
Contribute changes to the Feynman repository itself. Use when the task is to add features, fix bugs, update prompts or skills, change install or release behavior, improve docs, or prepare a focused PR against this repo.
Run a thorough, source-heavy investigation on any topic. Use when the user asks for deep research, a comprehensive analysis, an in-depth report, or a multi-source investigation. Produces a cited research brief with provenance tracking.
Execute research code inside isolated Docker containers for safe replication, experiments, and benchmarks. Use when the user selects Docker as the execution environment or asks to run code safely, in isolation, or in a sandbox.
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
| name | peer-review |
| description | Simulate a tough but constructive peer review of an AI research artifact. Use when the user asks for a review, critique, feedback on a paper or draft, or wants to identify weaknesses before submission. |
Run the /review workflow. Read the prompt template at ../prompts/review.md for the full procedure.
Agents used: researcher, reviewer
Output: structured review in outputs/.
This skill inherits the SeaBridgeAI /goal default protocol. Frame the work with a persistent goal, Definition of Done, validation plan, risks, dependencies, expected artifacts, and completion evidence. Do not claim completion until the DoD is validated or a hard blocker is documented.
Canonical protocol: C:\Users\adelm\SeaBridgeAI\everything-claude-code\protocols\GOAL_PROTOCOL.md
