ワンクリックで
verification-before-completion
MANDATORY: Verify with evidence before ANY completion claim. Run commands, check output, then state results.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
MANDATORY: Verify with evidence before ANY completion claim. Run commands, check output, then state results.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Verify WCAG 2.1 AA compliance by analyzing HTML structure, ARIA usage, contrast, keyboard patterns, and semantic markup. Runs before completion in FE Designer mode.
Guide the design of beautiful, accessible, systematic UI components. Auto-triggers when creating or restyling components in FE Designer mode.
Audit design system consistency — check tokens, spacing, colors, typography usage across the codebase. Triggers when modifying shared styles or on user request.
Self-critique visual output before completion. Evaluates visual hierarchy, CTA clarity, cognitive load, spacing consistency, and layout priority. MUST run before attempt_completion in FE Designer mode.
MANDATORY: Run validation tools after EVERY code change. Do not finish until code is error-free.
Auto-enforce coding standards after every code change in Code mode. Checks file size, nesting, naming, error handling, and anti-patterns.
| name | verification-before-completion |
| description | MANDATORY: Verify with evidence before ANY completion claim. Run commands, check output, then state results. |
| risk | safe |
| source | self |
| tags | ["verification","quality","mandatory","completion"] |
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
From 24 failure memories:
ALWAYS before:
Rule applies to:
Before attempt_completion, verify these rules were followed:
| Rule File | Quick Check |
|---|---|
core-principles.md | Did I read code before editing? Did I verify changes? |
development-workflow.md | Did I follow the right phases for this task size? |
security-first.md | No hardcoded secrets? Inputs validated? |
git-workflow.md | Conventional commit format? No debug artifacts? |
error-recovery.md | Did I ask when uncertain? Confidence level stated? |
performance-optimization.md | Efficient file reads? Context lean? |
If ANY check fails → fix before claiming completion.
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.