メニュー
Multi-agent debate with visible transcripts where agents respond to each other. USE WHEN council, debate, perspectives, weigh options, deliberate, multiple viewpoints. Unlike RedTeam (adversarial), Council is collaborative-adversarial.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms"). Use this skill when asked to "remove AI-isms," "clean up AI writing," "edit writing for AI patterns," "audit writing for AI tells," or "make this sound less like AI." Supports a detect-only mode, an edit-in-place mode for files, an optional voice profile (casual / professional / technical / warm / blunt), and an iterate-to-convergence pass.
Use this skill when reviewing production code for dead code, duplication, unnecessary complexity, and non-idiomatic patterns. Use after implementing a feature, after refactors, or whenever code quality feedback is requested.
Use this skill to review tests for false confidence, excessive mocking, meaningless assertions, and weak behavior coverage. Use after writing tests or when a suite passes but bugs still escape.
Summarize or extract text/transcripts from URLs, podcasts, and local files (great fallback for “transcribe this YouTube/video”).
Use this skill when the user asks to "commit", "make a commit", "commit my changes", "create a commit", or invokes /commit. Detects the active VCS (git, jj, or hg), inspects the working copy, drafts a commit message in the project's standard format (terse summary + detailed paragraph + test plan), and creates the commit. Honors staged-files-only when files are already staged in git. Handles jj-specific traps (interactive editors, conflict states, the operation log, the post-commit working copy gotcha) without dropping into TUIs that block non-interactive shells.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm", "design a feature", "think through an idea", "help me plan", or has a vague concept that needs refining into a technical specification through collaborative dialogue.
| name | council |
| description | Multi-agent debate with visible transcripts where agents respond to each other. USE WHEN council, debate, perspectives, weigh options, deliberate, multiple viewpoints. Unlike RedTeam (adversarial), Council is collaborative-adversarial. |
Multi-agent debate system where specialized agents discuss topics in rounds, respond to each other's points, and surface insights through intellectual friction.
Key Differentiator from RedTeam: Council is collaborative-adversarial (debate to find best path), while RedTeam is purely adversarial (attack the idea). Council produces visible conversation transcripts; RedTeam produces steelman + counter-argument.
Route to the appropriate workflow based on the request.
When executing a workflow, output this notification directly:
Running the **WorkflowName** workflow in the **Council** skill to ACTION...
| Trigger | Workflow |
|---|---|
| Full structured debate (3 rounds, visible transcript) | Workflows/Debate.md |
| Quick consensus check (1 round, fast) | Workflows/Quick.md |
| Pure adversarial analysis | RedTeam skill |
| Workflow | Purpose | Rounds | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEBATE | Full structured discussion | 3 | Complete transcript + synthesis |
| QUICK | Fast perspective check | 1 | Initial positions only |
| File | Content |
|---|---|
CouncilMembers.md | Agent roles, perspectives, voice mapping |
RoundStructure.md | Three-round debate structure and timing |
OutputFormat.md | Transcript format templates |
Origin: Best decisions emerge from diverse perspectives challenging each other. Not just collecting opinions - genuine intellectual friction where experts respond to each other's actual points.
Speed: Parallel execution within rounds, sequential between rounds. A 3-round debate of 4 agents = 12 agent calls but only 3 sequential waits. Complete in 30-90 seconds.
"Council: Should we use WebSockets or SSE?"
-> Invokes DEBATE workflow -> 3-round transcript
"Quick council check: Is this API design reasonable?"
-> Invokes QUICK workflow -> Fast perspectives
"Council with security: Evaluate this auth approach"
-> DEBATE with Security agent added
Works well with:
Last Updated: 2025-12-20