ワンクリックで
agentic-loop
Use when the orchestrator injects "Carga la skill agentic-loop" with a goal, eval_command, metric, and threshold
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Use when the orchestrator injects "Carga la skill agentic-loop" with a goal, eval_command, metric, and threshold
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when constructing or interpreting the approval handoff envelope between subagent and orchestrator -- sealed_payload schema, approval_id format, APPROVAL_REQUEST contract shape, and reading a granted approval from the DB
Use when producing any agent response
Use when classifying any operation before executing it, or deciding whether user approval is required
Use when a mutative command was blocked by the hook and you need to request user approval, or when presenting a plan for a T3 operation before executing it
Use when the user wants to build, design, or extend a diagram — an architecture overview, a timeline, a planner board, a flow diagram, a presentation, a comparison, or a mind-map — as a portable, data-driven deck rendered from plain YAML. Triggers — "build a diagram", "architecture diagram", "diagram deck", "timeline", "flow diagram", "planner board", "add a page/section/component to the diagram".
Use when the user wants something to run routinely / on a schedule rather than once now -- "tarea programada", "rutinariamente", "cada mañana", "cada N horas", "todas las noches", "schedule", "cron". Covers mounting, structuring, and running an unattended headless task that reports back, plus consuming its reports. NOT for a live in-session agentic loop (that is agentic-loop).
| name | agentic-loop |
| description | Use when the orchestrator injects "Carga la skill agentic-loop" with a goal, eval_command, metric, and threshold |
| metadata | {"user-invocable":false,"type":"technique"} |
Iterative improvement through small, reversible changes evaluated against a single metric. Each iteration is one hypothesis, one edit, one eval, one decision. The metric decides -- not you.
goal, eval_command, metric, direction (higher/lower), threshold, max_iterations, files_in_scope, branch
files_in_scope deeply -- understand before changinggit checkout -b {branch}eval_command -- parse METRIC {name}={number} from stdout -- this is your baselinestate.json and worklog.md (schemas in reference.md)git commit -m "baseline: {metric} {value}"eval_command, parse METRIC {name}={number}git add -A then git commit -m "improve: {metric} {old}->{new}"git checkout -- . then git clean -fdworklog.md: run number, what changed, result, insight, next ideastate.json with current valuesfiles_in_scope, review worklog "What's Been Tried", recalibrategit commit -m "final: {metric} {baseline}->{final} in N iterations", write summarystate.json (status: complete/stopped), write summary in worklog.mdInclude loop_status in your agent_contract_handoff agent_status on every response:
"loop_status": {
"iteration": 5,
"metric": 94.5,
"best": 94.5,
"baseline": 89.0,
"threshold": 98,
"status": "iterating"
}
Do NOT return plan_status: "COMPLETE" until the loop finishes. The user may be away for hours.
git clean -fdx instead of -fd -- destroys untracked config files needed by eval