メニュー
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when a request needs product/design exploration, unclear requirements, multiple viable approaches, UI/UX choices, or new behavior whose intent is not yet bounded.
Use when 2+ independent tasks, failures, research lanes, exploration lanes, or path-scoped investigations can run without shared state, shared files, or sequential dependency.
Use when executing a written implementation plan inline in the current session with checkpoints and verification.
Use when adding or changing a capability surface such as a public function, API, command, prompt, workflow, schema/helper, policy, or reusable instruction.
Use when implementation is complete, verification passes, and the remaining decision is how to integrate, merge, PR, clean up, or finish the branch.
Use when creating or revising docs, plans, records, PR text, handoffs, or other prose that should be sparse, direct, and low-context.
| name | requesting-code-review |
| description | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements |
Purpose: Dispatch a code-reviewer subagent with focused context (diff, requirements, tests) before merging. Consumer: Main agent with completed work that needs external review before integration. Failure consequence: Issues ship that a reviewer would have caught; reviewer rubber-stamps because the prompt wasn't focused. Falsifier: Throwaway branch, already-merged work, or single-line docs change below the review threshold.
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:
Dispatch a general-purpose subagent, filling the template at code-reviewer.md
Placeholders:
{DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary of what you built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do{BASE_SHA} - Starting commit{HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit3. Act on feedback:
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch code reviewer subagent]
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
Subagent-Driven Development:
Executing Plans:
Ad-Hoc Development:
Never:
If reviewer wrong:
See template at: code-reviewer.md