メニュー
Use when reviewing code before merge to assess correctness, tests, maintainability, security and user impact.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | code-review-and-quality |
| description | Use when reviewing code before merge to assess correctness, tests, maintainability, security and user impact. |
Use this skill when reviewing a diff written by yourself, another agent or a human, or when deciding whether a change is ready to merge.
Identify correctness risks, test gaps, maintainability problems, hidden regressions and security concerns before the change lands.
tdd-practice — tests as review evidencelogical-fallacy-review — invalid reasoning in review commentsgit-workflow-and-versioning — reviewable atomic changesguardrails-safety-patterns — security findings in reviewUse when reviewing plans, recommendations, prioritisation, risk registers, retrospectives or agent outputs for judgement distortion from cognitive bias — not for checking whether an argument's premises validly support its conclusion.
Use when evaluating whether premises in plans, ADRs, reviews, security justifications or agent recommendations validly support their conclusions — for logical fallacies, not judgement distortion from cognitive bias.
Use when a coding agent needs robust problem solving, explicit decomposition, alternative-path exploration, program-aided reasoning, ReAct loops, or self-correction.
Use when generated code, plans, tests, prompts or architecture need critique, repair and verification before completion; especially for coding tasks requiring self-review, test-driven repair or quality gates.
Identifies risks, scores likelihood and impact, selects treatment, assigns owners and review cadence. Use when building or updating a risk register, treating agent autonomy risks, or deciding mitigate, transfer, accept or avoid.
Identifies assets, trust boundaries, threats and mitigations for systems and agents. Use when designing security-sensitive features, reviewing attack surface, or planning abuse-case tests.