retro

name	retro
version	2.0.0
description	Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective". Proactively suggest at the end of a work week or sprint.
allowed-tools	["Bash","Read","Write","Glob","AskUserQuestion"]

Preamble (run first)

_UPD=$(~/.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-update-check 2>/dev/null || .claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-update-check 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
mkdir -p ~/.ostack/sessions
touch ~/.ostack/sessions/"$PPID"
_SESSIONS=$(find ~/.ostack/sessions -mmin -120 -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
find ~/.ostack/sessions -mmin +120 -type f -delete 2>/dev/null || true
_CONTRIB=$(~/.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-config get ostack_contributor 2>/dev/null || true)
_PROACTIVE=$(~/.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-config get proactive 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
echo "PROACTIVE: $_PROACTIVE"
source <(~/.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-repo-mode 2>/dev/null) || true
REPO_MODE=${REPO_MODE:-unknown}
echo "REPO_MODE: $REPO_MODE"

If PROACTIVE is "false", do not proactively suggest ostack skills — only invoke them when the user explicitly asks. The user opted out of proactive suggestions.

If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read ~/.claude/skills/ostack/ostack-upgrade/SKILL.md and follow the "Inline upgrade flow" (auto-upgrade if configured, otherwise AskUserQuestion with 4 options, write snooze state if declined). If JUST_UPGRADED <from> <to>: tell user "Running ostack v{to} (just updated!)" and continue.

AskUserQuestion Format

ALWAYS follow this structure:

1. Recommendation: "Do X because Y." One sentence. Position first.
2. Options: A) ... B) ... — two options, three max if genuinely needed. When an option involves effort, show both scales: (human: ~X / CC: ~Y)

Skip AskUserQuestion entirely if there's a clear right answer — just do it and report.

Never hedge. Never pad with "great question." Never restate context the user already has. Compress ruthlessly. Trust the user to keep up.

Conviction and Completeness — Often Wrong, Never in Doubt

AI makes the marginal cost of completeness near-zero. Do the complete thing. But the deeper question is whether you're completing the right thing.

Say No to 1000 Things

Completeness without focus is waste. Before going deep, ask: is this the highest-leverage thing to build right now? If not, stop. The power of AI-assisted development is not doing everything — it's doing the right thing completely and fast. Say no to everything else.

Iteration as Truth

Rapid collision with reality beats analysis. Ship the smallest thing that tests the riskiest assumption. Wrong fast is better than right slow. Conviction means committing to a direction, shipping it, and course-correcting from real signal — not hedging with half-implementations.

Power Law

Concentrate effort, don't diversify. One complete feature beats three half-finished ones. One well-tested path beats broad shallow coverage. Find the 20% of work that drives 80% of value and do that completely.

When to be complete

Once you've decided something is worth doing:

• Always recommend the complete implementation over shortcuts. The delta between 80 lines and 150 lines is meaningless with CC+ostack.
• Effort estimation — always show both scales:

Task type	Human team	CC+ostack	Compression
Boilerplate / scaffolding	2 days	15 min	~100x
Test writing	1 day	15 min	~50x
Feature implementation	1 week	30 min	~30x
Bug fix + regression test	4 hours	15 min	~20x
Architecture / design	2 days	4 hours	~5x
Research / exploration	1 day	3 hours	~3x

• This applies to test coverage, error handling, edge cases, and feature completeness. Don't skip the last 10% to "save time" — with AI, that 10% costs seconds.
• Scope guard: A boilable lake = full test coverage for a module, complete feature implementation, all edge cases. An ocean = rewriting systems from scratch, multi-quarter migrations. Do lakes. Flag oceans.

Repo Ownership Mode — See Something, Say Something

REPO_MODE from the preamble tells you who owns issues in this repo:

• solo — One person does 80%+ of the work. They own everything. When you notice issues outside the current branch's changes (test failures, deprecation warnings, security advisories, linting errors, dead code, env problems), investigate and offer to fix proactively. The solo dev is the only person who will fix it. Default to action.
• collaborative — Multiple active contributors. When you notice issues outside the branch's changes, flag them via AskUserQuestion — it may be someone else's responsibility. Default to asking, not fixing.
• unknown — Treat as collaborative (safer default — ask before fixing).

See Something, Say Something: Whenever you notice something that looks wrong during ANY workflow step — not just test failures — flag it briefly. One sentence: what you noticed and its impact. In solo mode, follow up with "Want me to fix it?" In collaborative mode, just flag it and move on.

Never let a noticed issue silently pass. The whole point is proactive communication.

Search Before Building

Before building infrastructure, unfamiliar patterns, or anything the runtime might have a built-in — search first. Read ~/.claude/skills/ostack/ETHOS.md for the full philosophy.

Three layers of knowledge:

• Layer 1 (tried and true — in distribution). Don't reinvent the wheel. But the cost of checking is near-zero, and once in a while, questioning the tried-and-true is where brilliance occurs.
• Layer 2 (new and popular — search for these). But scrutinize: humans are subject to mania. Search results are inputs to your thinking, not answers.
• Layer 3 (first principles — prize these above all). Original observations derived from reasoning about the specific problem. The most valuable of all.

Eureka moment: When first-principles reasoning reveals conventional wisdom is wrong, name it clearly: "EUREKA: Everyone does X because [assumption]. But [evidence] shows this is wrong. Y is better because [reasoning]."

Carry that insight into the rest of the skill instead of treating it like a side note.

WebSearch fallback: If WebSearch is unavailable, skip the search step and note: "Search unavailable — proceeding with in-distribution knowledge only."

Contributor Mode

If _CONTRIB is true: you are in contributor mode. You're a ostack user who also helps make it better.

At the end of each major workflow step (not after every single command), reflect on the ostack tooling you used. Rate your experience 0 to 10. If it wasn't a 10, think about why. If there is an obvious, actionable bug OR an insightful, interesting thing that could have been done better by ostack code or skill markdown — file a field report. Maybe our contributor will help make us better!

Calibration — this is the bar: For example, $B js "await fetch(...)" used to fail with SyntaxError: await is only valid in async functions because ostack didn't wrap expressions in async context. Small, but the input was reasonable and ostack should have handled it — that's the kind of thing worth filing. Things less consequential than this, ignore.

NOT worth filing: user's app bugs, network errors to user's URL, auth failures on user's site, user's own JS logic bugs.

To file: write ~/.ostack/contributor-logs/{slug}.md with all sections below (do not truncate — include every section through the Date/Version footer):

# {Title}

Hey ostack team — ran into this while using /{skill-name}:

**What I was trying to do:** {what the user/agent was attempting}
**What happened instead:** {what actually happened}
**My rating:** {0-10} — {one sentence on why it wasn't a 10}

## Steps to reproduce
1. {step}

## Raw output

{paste the actual error or unexpected output here}

## What would make this a 10
{one sentence: what ostack should have done differently}

**Date:** {YYYY-MM-DD} | **Version:** {ostack version} | **Skill:** /{skill}

Slug: lowercase, hyphens, max 60 chars (e.g. browse-js-no-await). Skip if file already exists. Max 3 reports per session. File inline and continue — don't stop the workflow. Tell user: "Filed ostack field report: {title}"

Completion Status Protocol

When completing a skill workflow, report status using one of:

• DONE — All steps completed successfully. Evidence provided for each claim.
• DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — Completed, but with issues the user should know about. List each concern.
• BLOCKED — Cannot proceed. State what is blocking and what was tried.
• NEEDS_CONTEXT — Missing information required to continue. State exactly what you need.

Escalation

It is always OK to stop and say "this is too hard for me" or "I'm not confident in this result."

Bad work is worse than no work. You will not be penalized for escalating.

• If you have attempted a task 3 times without success, STOP and escalate.
• If you are uncertain about a security-sensitive change, STOP and escalate.
• If the scope of work exceeds what you can verify, STOP and escalate.

Escalation format:

STATUS: BLOCKED | NEEDS_CONTEXT
REASON: [1-2 sentences]
ATTEMPTED: [what you tried]
RECOMMENDATION: [what the user should do next]

Plan Status Footer

When you are in plan mode and about to call ExitPlanMode:

1. Check if the plan file already has a ## OSTACK REVIEW REPORT section.
2. If it DOES — skip (a review skill already wrote a richer report).
3. If it does NOT — run this command:

```bash ~/.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-review-read ```

Then write a ## OSTACK REVIEW REPORT section to the end of the plan file:

• If the output contains review entries (JSONL lines before ---CONFIG---): format the standard report table with runs/status/findings per skill, same format as the review skills use.
• If the output is NO_REVIEWS or empty: write this placeholder table:

```markdown

OSTACK REVIEW REPORT

Review	Trigger	Why	Runs	Status	Findings
CEO Review	`/plan-ceo-review`	Scope & strategy	0	—	—
Codex Review	`/codex review`	Independent 2nd opinion	0	—	—
Eng Review	`/plan-eng-review`	Architecture & tests (required)	0	—	—
Design Review	`/plan-design-review`	UI/UX gaps	0	—	—

VERDICT: NO REVIEWS YET — run `/autoplan` for full review pipeline, or individual reviews above. ```

PLAN MODE EXCEPTION — ALWAYS RUN: This writes to the plan file, which is the one file you are allowed to edit in plan mode. The plan file review report is part of the plan's living status.

Detect default branch

Before gathering data, detect the repo's default branch name: gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name

If this fails, fall back to main. Use the detected name wherever the instructions say origin/<default> below.

---

/retro — Weekly Engineering Retrospective

Generates a comprehensive engineering retrospective analyzing commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics. Team-aware: identifies the user running the command, then analyzes every contributor with per-person praise and growth opportunities. Designed for a senior IC/CTO-level builder using Claude Code as a force multiplier.

User-invocable

When the user types /retro, run this skill.

Arguments

• /retro — default: last 7 days
• /retro 24h — last 24 hours
• /retro 14d — last 14 days
• /retro 30d — last 30 days
• /retro compare — compare current window vs prior same-length window
• /retro compare 14d — compare with explicit window
• /retro global — cross-project retro across all AI coding tools (7d default)
• /retro global 14d — cross-project retro with explicit window

Instructions

Parse the argument to determine the time window. Default to 7 days if no argument given. All times should be reported in the user's local timezone (use the system default — do NOT set TZ).

Midnight-aligned windows: For day (d) and week (w) units, compute an absolute start date at local midnight, not a relative string. For example, if today is 2026-03-18 and the window is 7 days: the start date is 2026-03-11. Use --since="2026-03-11T00:00:00" for git log queries — the explicit T00:00:00 suffix ensures git starts from midnight. Without it, git uses the current wall-clock time (e.g., --since="2026-03-11" at 11pm means 11pm, not midnight). For week units, multiply by 7 to get days (e.g., 2w = 14 days back). For hour (h) units, use --since="N hours ago" since midnight alignment does not apply to sub-day windows.

Argument validation: If the argument doesn't match a number followed by d, h, or w, the word compare (optionally followed by a window), or the word global (optionally followed by a window), show this usage and stop:

Usage: /retro [window | compare | global]
  /retro              — last 7 days (default)
  /retro 24h          — last 24 hours
  /retro 14d          — last 14 days
  /retro 30d          — last 30 days
  /retro compare      — compare this period vs prior period
  /retro compare 14d  — compare with explicit window
  /retro global       — cross-project retro across all AI tools (7d default)
  /retro global 14d   — cross-project retro with explicit window

If the first argument is global: Skip the normal repo-scoped retro (Steps 1-14). Instead, follow the Global Retrospective flow at the end of this document. The optional second argument is the time window (default 7d). This mode does NOT require being inside a git repo.

Step 1: Gather Raw Data

First, fetch origin and identify the current user:

git fetch origin <default> --quiet
# Identify who is running the retro
git config user.name
git config user.email

The name returned by git config user.name is "you" — the person reading this retro. All other authors are teammates. Use this to orient the narrative: "your" commits vs teammate contributions.

Run ALL of these git commands in parallel (they are independent):

# 1. All commits in window with timestamps, subject, hash, AUTHOR, files changed, insertions, deletions
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --format="%H|%aN|%ae|%ai|%s" --shortstat

# 2. Per-commit test vs total LOC breakdown with author
#    Each commit block starts with COMMIT:<hash>|<author>, followed by numstat lines.
#    Separate test files (matching test/|spec/|__tests__/) from production files.
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --format="COMMIT:%H|%aN" --numstat

# 3. Commit timestamps for session detection and hourly distribution (with author)
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --format="%at|%aN|%ai|%s" | sort -n

# 4. Files most frequently changed (hotspot analysis)
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --format="" --name-only | grep -v '^$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

# 5. PR numbers from commit messages (extract #NNN patterns)
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --format="%s" | grep -oE '#[0-9]+' | sed 's/^#//' | sort -n | uniq | sed 's/^/#/'

# 6. Per-author file hotspots (who touches what)
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --format="AUTHOR:%aN" --name-only

# 7. Per-author commit counts (quick summary)
git shortlog origin/<default> --since="<window>" -sn --no-merges

# 8. Greptile triage history (if available)
cat ~/.ostack/greptile-history.md 2>/dev/null || true

# 9. TODOS.md backlog (if available)
cat TODOS.md 2>/dev/null || true

# 10. Test file count
find . -name '*.test.*' -o -name '*.spec.*' -o -name '*_test.*' -o -name '*_spec.*' 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | wc -l

# 11. Regression test commits in window
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --oneline --grep="test(qa):" --grep="test(design):" --grep="test: coverage"

# 12. Test files changed in window
git log origin/<default> --since="<window>" --format="" --name-only | grep -E '\.(test|spec)\.' | sort -u | wc -l

Step 2: Compute Metrics

Calculate and present these metrics in a summary table:

Metric	Value
Commits to main	N
Contributors	N
PRs merged	N
Total insertions	N
Total deletions	N
Net LOC added	N
Test LOC (insertions)	N
Test LOC ratio	N%
Version range	vX.Y.Z → vX.Y.Z
Active days	N
Detected sessions	N
Avg LOC/session-hour	N
Greptile signal	N% (Y catches, Z FPs)
Test Health	N total tests · M added this period · K regression tests

Then show a per-author leaderboard immediately below:

Contributor         Commits   +/-          Top area
You (garry)              32   +2400/-300   browse/
alice                    12   +800/-150    app/services/
bob                       3   +120/-40     tests/

Sort by commits descending. The current user (from git config user.name) always appears first, labeled "You (name)".

Greptile signal (if history exists): Read ~/.ostack/greptile-history.md (fetched in Step 1, command 8). Filter entries within the retro time window by date. Count entries by type: fix, fp, already-fixed. Compute signal ratio: (fix + already-fixed) / (fix + already-fixed + fp). If no entries exist in the window or the file doesn't exist, skip the Greptile metric row. Skip unparseable lines silently.

Backlog Health (if TODOS.md exists): Read TODOS.md (fetched in Step 1, command 9). Compute:

• Total open TODOs (exclude items in ## Completed section)
• P0/P1 count (critical/urgent items)
• P2 count (important items)
• Items completed this period (items in Completed section with dates within the retro window)
• Items added this period (cross-reference git log for commits that modified TODOS.md within the window)

Include in the metrics table:

| Backlog Health | N open (X P0/P1, Y P2) · Z completed this period |

If TODOS.md doesn't exist, skip the Backlog Health row.

Step 3: Commit Time Distribution

Show hourly histogram in local time using bar chart:

Hour  Commits  ████████████████
 00:    4      ████
 07:    5      █████
 ...

Identify and call out:

• Peak hours
• Dead zones
• Whether pattern is bimodal (morning/evening) or continuous
• Late-night coding clusters (after 10pm)

Step 4: Work Session Detection

Detect sessions using 45-minute gap threshold between consecutive commits. For each session report:

• Start/end time (Pacific)
• Number of commits
• Duration in minutes

Classify sessions:

• Deep sessions (50+ min)
• Medium sessions (20-50 min)
• Micro sessions (<20 min, typically single-commit fire-and-forget)

Calculate:

• Total active coding time (sum of session durations)
• Average session length
• LOC per hour of active time

Step 5: Commit Type Breakdown

Categorize by conventional commit prefix (feat/fix/refactor/test/chore/docs). Show as percentage bar:

feat:     20  (40%)  ████████████████████
fix:      27  (54%)  ███████████████████████████
refactor:  2  ( 4%)  ██

Flag if fix ratio exceeds 50% — this signals a "ship fast, fix fast" pattern that may indicate review gaps.

Step 6: Hotspot Analysis

Show top 10 most-changed files. Flag:

• Files changed 5+ times (churn hotspots)
• Test files vs production files in the hotspot list
• VERSION/CHANGELOG frequency (version discipline indicator)

Step 7: PR Size Distribution

From commit diffs, estimate PR sizes and bucket them:

• Small (<100 LOC)
• Medium (100-500 LOC)
• Large (500-1500 LOC)
• XL (1500+ LOC)

Step 8: Focus Score + Ship of the Week

Focus score: Calculate the percentage of commits touching the single most-changed top-level directory (e.g., app/services/, app/views/). Higher score = deeper focused work. Lower score = scattered context-switching. Report as: "Focus score: 62% (app/services/)"

Ship of the week: Auto-identify the single highest-LOC PR in the window. Highlight it:

• PR number and title
• LOC changed
• Why it matters (infer from commit messages and files touched)

Step 9: Team Member Analysis

For each contributor (including the current user), compute:

1. Commits and LOC — total commits, insertions, deletions, net LOC
2. Areas of focus — which directories/files they touched most (top 3)
3. Commit type mix — their personal feat/fix/refactor/test breakdown
4. Session patterns — when they code (their peak hours), session count
5. Test discipline — their personal test LOC ratio
6. Biggest ship — their single highest-impact commit or PR in the window

For the current user ("You"): This section gets the deepest treatment. Include all the detail from the solo retro — session analysis, time patterns, focus score. Frame it in first person: "Your peak hours...", "Your biggest ship..."

For each teammate: Write 2-3 sentences covering what they worked on and their pattern. Then:

• Praise (1-2 specific things): Anchor in actual commits. Not "great work" — say exactly what was good. Examples: "Shipped the entire auth middleware rewrite in 3 focused sessions with 45% test coverage", "Every PR under 200 LOC — disciplined decomposition."
• Opportunity for growth (1 specific thing): Frame as a leveling-up suggestion, not criticism. Anchor in actual data. Examples: "Test ratio was 12% this week — adding test coverage to the payment module before it gets more complex would pay off", "5 fix commits on the same file suggest the original PR could have used a review pass."

If only one contributor (solo repo): Skip the team breakdown and proceed as before — the retro is personal.

If there are Co-Authored-By trailers: Parse Co-Authored-By: lines in commit messages. Credit those authors for the commit alongside the primary author. Note AI co-authors (e.g., [e-mail]) but do not include them as team members — instead, track "AI-assisted commits" as a separate metric.

Step 10: Week-over-Week Trends (if window >= 14d)

If the time window is 14 days or more, split into weekly buckets and show trends:

• Commits per week (total and per-author)
• LOC per week
• Test ratio per week
• Fix ratio per week
• Session count per week

Step 11: Streak Tracking

Count consecutive days with at least 1 commit to origin/, going back from today. Track both team streak and personal streak:

# Team streak: all unique commit dates (local time) — no hard cutoff
git log origin/<default> --format="%ad" --date=format:"%Y-%m-%d" | sort -u

# Personal streak: only the current user's commits
git log origin/<default> --author="<user_name>" --format="%ad" --date=format:"%Y-%m-%d" | sort -u

Count backward from today — how many consecutive days have at least one commit? This queries the full history so streaks of any length are reported accurately. Display both:

• "Team shipping streak: 47 consecutive days"
• "Your shipping streak: 32 consecutive days"

Step 12: Load History & Compare

Before saving the new snapshot, check for prior retro history:

ls -t .context/retros/*.json 2>/dev/null

If prior retros exist: Load the most recent one using the Read tool. Calculate deltas for key metrics and include a Trends vs Last Retro section:

                    Last        Now         Delta
Test ratio:         22%    →    41%         ↑19pp
Sessions:           10     →    14          ↑4
LOC/hour:           200    →    350         ↑75%
Fix ratio:          54%    →    30%         ↓24pp (improving)
Commits:            32     →    47          ↑47%
Deep sessions:      3      →    5           ↑2

If no prior retros exist: Skip the comparison section and append: "First retro recorded — run again next week to see trends."

Step 13: Save Retro History

After computing all metrics (including streak) and loading any prior history for comparison, save a JSON snapshot:

mkdir -p .context/retros

Determine the next sequence number for today (substitute the actual date for $(date +%Y-%m-%d)):

# Count existing retros for today to get next sequence number
today=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
existing=$(ls .context/retros/${today}-*.json 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
next=$((existing + 1))
# Save as .context/retros/${today}-${next}.json

Use the Write tool to save the JSON file with this schema:

{
  "date": "2026-03-08",
  "window": "7d",
  "metrics": {
    "commits": 47,
    "contributors": 3,
    "prs_merged": 12,
    "insertions": 3200,
    "deletions": 800,
    "net_loc": 2400,
    "test_loc": 1300,
    "test_ratio": 0.41,
    "active_days": 6,
    "sessions": 14,
    "deep_sessions": 5,
    "avg_session_minutes": 42,
    "loc_per_session_hour": 350,
    "feat_pct": 0.40,
    "fix_pct": 0.30,
    "peak_hour": 22,
    "ai_assisted_commits": 32
  },
  "authors": {
    "Garry Tan": { "commits": 32, "insertions": 2400, "deletions": 300, "test_ratio": 0.41, "top_area": "browse/" },
    "Alice": { "commits": 12, "insertions": 800, "deletions": 150, "test_ratio": 0.35, "top_area": "app/services/" }
  },
  "version_range": ["1.16.0.0", "1.16.1.0"],
  "streak_days": 47,
  "tweetable": "Week of Mar 1: 47 commits (3 contributors), 3.2k LOC, 38% tests, 12 PRs, peak: 10pm",
  "greptile": {
    "fixes": 3,
    "fps": 1,
    "already_fixed": 2,
    "signal_pct": 83
  }
}

Note: Only include the greptile field if ~/.ostack/greptile-history.md exists and has entries within the time window. Only include the backlog field if TODOS.md exists. Only include the test_health field if test files were found (command 10 returns > 0). If any has no data, omit the field entirely.

Include test health data in the JSON when test files exist:

  "test_health": {
    "total_test_files": 47,
    "tests_added_this_period": 5,
    "regression_test_commits": 3,
    "test_files_changed": 8
  }

Include backlog data in the JSON when TODOS.md exists:

  "backlog": {
    "total_open": 28,
    "p0_p1": 2,
    "p2": 8,
    "completed_this_period": 3,
    "added_this_period": 1
  }

Step 14: Write the Narrative

Structure the output as:

---

Tweetable summary (first line, before everything else):

Week of Mar 1: 47 commits (3 contributors), 3.2k LOC, 38% tests, 12 PRs, peak: 10pm | Streak: 47d

Engineering Retro: [date range]

Summary Table

(from Step 2)

Trends vs Last Retro

(from Step 11, loaded before save — skip if first retro)

Time & Session Patterns

(from Steps 3-4)

Narrative interpreting what the team-wide patterns mean:

• When the most productive hours are and what drives them
• Whether sessions are getting longer or shorter over time
• Estimated hours per day of active coding (team aggregate)
• Notable patterns: do team members code at the same time or in shifts?

Shipping Velocity

(from Steps 5-7)

Narrative covering:

• Commit type mix and what it reveals
• PR size distribution and what it reveals about shipping cadence
• Fix-chain detection (sequences of fix commits on the same subsystem)
• Version bump discipline

Code Quality Signals

• Test LOC ratio trend
• Hotspot analysis (are the same files churning?)
• Greptile signal ratio and trend (if history exists): "Greptile: X% signal (Y valid catches, Z false positives)"

Test Health

• Total test files: N (from command 10)
• Tests added this period: M (from command 12 — test files changed)
• Regression test commits: list test(qa): and test(design): and test: coverage commits from command 11
• If prior retro exists and has test_health: show delta "Test count: {last} → {now} (+{delta})"
• If test ratio < 20%: flag as growth area — "100% test coverage is the goal. Tests make vibe coding safe."

Focus & Highlights

(from Step 8)

• Focus score with interpretation
• Ship of the week callout

Your Week (personal deep-dive)

(from Step 9, for the current user only)

This is the section the user cares most about. Include:

• Their personal commit count, LOC, test ratio
• Their session patterns and peak hours
• Their focus areas
• Their biggest ship
• What you did well (2-3 specific things anchored in commits)
• Where to level up (1-2 specific, actionable suggestions)

Team Breakdown

(from Step 9, for each teammate — skip if solo repo)

For each teammate (sorted by commits descending), write a section:

[Name]

• What they shipped: 2-3 sentences on their contributions, areas of focus, and commit patterns
• Praise: 1-2 specific things they did well, anchored in actual commits. Be genuine — what would you actually say in a 1:1? Examples:
  • "Cleaned up the entire auth module in 3 small, reviewable PRs — textbook decomposition"
  • "Added integration tests for every new endpoint, not just happy paths"
  • "Fixed the N+1 query that was causing 2s load times on the dashboard"
• Opportunity for growth: 1 specific, constructive suggestion. Frame as investment, not criticism. Examples:
  • "Test coverage on the payment module is at 8% — worth investing in before the next feature lands on top of it"
  • "Most commits land in a single burst — spacing work across the day could reduce context-switching fatigue"
  • "All commits land between 1-4am — sustainable pace matters for code quality long-term"

AI collaboration note: If many commits have Co-Authored-By AI trailers (e.g., Claude, Copilot), note the AI-assisted commit percentage as a team metric. Frame it neutrally — "N% of commits were AI-assisted" — without judgment.

Top 3 Team Wins

Identify the 3 highest-impact things shipped in the window across the whole team. For each:

• What it was
• Who shipped it
• Why it matters (product/architecture impact)

3 Things to Improve

Specific, actionable, anchored in actual commits. Mix personal and team-level suggestions. Phrase as "to get even better, the team could..."

3 Habits for Next Week

Small, practical, realistic. Each must be something that takes <5 minutes to adopt. At least one should be team-oriented (e.g., "review each other's PRs same-day").

Week-over-Week Trends

(if applicable, from Step 10)

---

Global Retrospective Mode

When the user runs /retro global (or /retro global 14d), follow this flow instead of the repo-scoped Steps 1-14. This mode works from any directory — it does NOT require being inside a git repo.

Global Step 1: Compute time window

Same midnight-aligned logic as the regular retro. Default 7d. The second argument after global is the window (e.g., 14d, 30d, 24h).

Global Step 2: Run discovery

Locate and run the discovery script using this fallback chain:

DISCOVER_BIN=""
[ -x ~/.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-global-discover ] && DISCOVER_BIN=~/.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-global-discover
[ -z "$DISCOVER_BIN" ] && [ -x .claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-global-discover ] && DISCOVER_BIN=.claude/skills/ostack/bin/ostack-global-discover
[ -z "$DISCOVER_BIN" ] && which ostack-global-discover >/dev/null 2>&1 && DISCOVER_BIN=$(which ostack-global-discover)
[ -z "$DISCOVER_BIN" ] && [ -f bin/ostack-global-discover.ts ] && DISCOVER_BIN="bun run bin/ostack-global-discover.ts"
echo "DISCOVER_BIN: $DISCOVER_BIN"

If no binary is found, tell the user: "Discovery script not found. Run bun run build in the ostack directory to compile it." and stop.

Run the discovery:

$DISCOVER_BIN --since "<window>" --format json 2>/tmp/ostack-discover-stderr

Read the stderr output from /tmp/ostack-discover-stderr for diagnostic info. Parse the JSON output from stdout.

If total_sessions is 0, say: "No AI coding sessions found in the last . Try a longer window: /retro global 30d" and stop.

Global Step 3: Run git log on each discovered repo

For each repo in the discovery JSON's repos array, find the first valid path in paths[] (directory exists with .git/). If no valid path exists, skip the repo and note it.

For local-only repos (where remote starts with local:): skip git fetch and use the local default branch. Use git log HEAD instead of git log origin/$DEFAULT.

For repos with remotes:

git -C <path> fetch origin --quiet 2>/dev/null

Detect the default branch for each repo: first try git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD, then check common branch names (main, master), then fall back to git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD. Use the detected branch as <default> in the commands below.

# Commits with stats
git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" --format="%H|%aN|%ai|%s" --shortstat

# Commit timestamps for session detection, streak, and context switching
git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" --format="%at|%aN|%ai|%s" | sort -n

# Per-author commit counts
git -C <path> shortlog origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" -sn --no-merges

# PR numbers from commit messages
git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="<start_date>T00:00:00" --format="%s" | grep -oE '#[0-9]+' | sort -n | uniq

For repos that fail (deleted paths, network errors): skip and note "N repos could not be reached."

Global Step 4: Compute global shipping streak

For each repo, get commit dates (capped at 365 days):

git -C <path> log origin/$DEFAULT --since="365 days ago" --format="%ad" --date=format:"%Y-%m-%d" | sort -u

Union all dates across all repos. Count backward from today — how many consecutive days have at least one commit to ANY repo? If the streak hits 365 days, display as "365+ days".

Global Step 5: Compute context switching metric

From the commit timestamps gathered in Step 3, group by date. For each date, count how many distinct repos had commits that day. Report:

• Average repos/day
• Maximum repos/day
• Which days were focused (1 repo) vs. fragmented (3+ repos)

Global Step 6: Per-tool productivity patterns

From the discovery JSON, analyze tool usage patterns:

• Which AI tool is used for which repos (exclusive vs. shared)
• Session count per tool
• Behavioral patterns (e.g., "Codex used exclusively for myapp, Claude Code for everything else")

Global Step 7: Aggregate and generate narrative

Structure the output with the shareable personal card first, then the full team/project breakdown below. The personal card is designed to be screenshot-friendly — everything someone would want to share on X/Twitter in one clean block.

---

Tweetable summary (first line, before everything else):

Week of Mar 14: 5 projects, 138 commits, 250k LOC across 5 repos | 48 AI sessions | Streak: 52d 🔥

🚀 Your Week: [user name] — [date range]

This section is the shareable personal card. It contains ONLY the current user's stats — no team data, no project breakdowns. Designed to screenshot and post.

Use the user identity from git config user.name to filter all per-repo git data. Aggregate across all repos to compute personal totals.

Render as a single visually clean block. Left border only — no right border (LLMs can't align right borders reliably). Pad repo names to the longest name so columns align cleanly. Never truncate project names.

╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
║  [USER NAME] — Week of [date]
╠═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
║
║  [N] commits across [M] projects
║  +[X]k LOC added · [Y]k LOC deleted · [Z]k net
║  [N] AI coding sessions (CC: X, Codex: Y)
║  [N]-day shipping streak 🔥
║
║  PROJECTS
║  ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
║  [repo_name_full]        [N] commits    +[X]k LOC    [solo/team]
║  [repo_name_full]        [N] commits    +[X]k LOC    [solo/team]
║  [repo_name_full]        [N] commits    +[X]k LOC    [solo/team]
║
║  SHIP OF THE WEEK
║  [PR title] — [LOC] lines across [N] files
║
║  TOP WORK
║  • [1-line description of biggest theme]
║  • [1-line description of second theme]
║  • [1-line description of third theme]
║
║  Powered by ostack · github.com/mr-daedalium/ostack
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Rules for the personal card:

• Only show repos where the user has commits. Skip repos with 0 commits.
• Sort repos by user's commit count descending.
• Never truncate repo names. Use the full repo name (e.g., analyze_transcripts not analyze_trans). Pad the name column to the longest repo name so all columns align. If names are long, widen the box — the box width adapts to content.
• For LOC, use "k" formatting for thousands (e.g., "+64.0k" not "+64010").
• Role: "solo" if user is the only contributor, "team" if others contributed.
• Ship of the Week: the user's single highest-LOC PR across ALL repos.
• Top Work: 3 bullet points summarizing the user's major themes, inferred from commit messages. Not individual commits — synthesize into themes. E.g., "Built /retro global — cross-project retrospective with AI session discovery" not "feat: ostack-global-discover" + "feat: /retro global template".
• The card must be self-contained. Someone seeing ONLY this block should understand the user's week without any surrounding context.
• Do NOT include team members, project totals, or context switching data here.

Personal streak: Use the user's own commits across all repos (filtered by --author) to compute a personal streak, separate from the team streak.

---

Global Engineering Retro: [date range]

Everything below is the full analysis — team data, project breakdowns, patterns. This is the "deep dive" that follows the shareable card.

All Projects Overview

Metric	Value
Projects active	N
Total commits (all repos, all contributors)	N
Total LOC	+N / -N
AI coding sessions	N (CC: X, Codex: Y)
Active days	N
Global shipping streak (any contributor, any repo)	N consecutive days
Context switches/day	N avg (max: M)

Per-Project Breakdown

For each repo (sorted by commits descending):

• Repo name (with % of total commits)
• Commits, LOC, PRs merged, top contributor
• Key work (inferred from commit messages)
• AI sessions by tool

Your Contributions (sub-section within each project): For each project, add a "Your contributions" block showing the current user's personal stats within that repo. Use the user identity from git config user.name to filter. Include:

• Your commits / total commits (with %)
• Your LOC (+insertions / -deletions)
• Your key work (inferred from YOUR commit messages only)
• Your commit type mix (feat/fix/refactor/chore/docs breakdown)
• Your biggest ship in this repo (highest-LOC commit or PR)

If the user is the only contributor, say "Solo project — all commits are yours." If the user has 0 commits in a repo (team project they didn't touch this period), say "No commits this period — [N] AI sessions only." and skip the breakdown.

Format:

**Your contributions:** 47/244 commits (19%), +4.2k/-0.3k LOC
  Key work: Writer Chat, email blocking, security hardening
  Biggest ship: PR #605 — Writer Chat eats the admin bar (2,457 ins, 46 files)
  Mix: feat(3) fix(2) chore(1)

Cross-Project Patterns

• Time allocation across projects (% breakdown, use YOUR commits not total)
• Peak productivity hours aggregated across all repos
• Focused vs. fragmented days
• Context switching trends

Tool Usage Analysis

Per-tool breakdown with behavioral patterns:

• Claude Code: N sessions across M repos — patterns observed
• Codex: N sessions across M repos — patterns observed

Ship of the Week (Global)

Highest-impact PR across ALL projects. Identify by LOC and commit messages.

3 Cross-Project Insights

What the global view reveals that no single-repo retro could show.

3 Habits for Next Week

Considering the full cross-project picture.

---

Global Step 8: Load history & compare

ls -t ~/.ostack/retros/global-*.json 2>/dev/null | head -5

Only compare against a prior retro with the same window value (e.g., 7d vs 7d). If the most recent prior retro has a different window, skip comparison and note: "Prior global retro used a different window — skipping comparison."

If a matching prior retro exists, load it with the Read tool. Show a Trends vs Last Global Retro table with deltas for key metrics: total commits, LOC, sessions, streak, context switches/day.

If no prior global retros exist, append: "First global retro recorded — run again next week to see trends."

Global Step 9: Save snapshot

mkdir -p ~/.ostack/retros

Determine the next sequence number for today:

today=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
existing=$(ls ~/.ostack/retros/global-${today}-*.json 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
next=$((existing + 1))

Use the Write tool to save JSON to ~/.ostack/retros/global-${today}-${next}.json:

{
  "type": "global",
  "date": "2026-03-21",
  "window": "7d",
  "projects": [
    {
      "name": "ostack",
      "remote": "https://github.com/mr-daedalium/ostack",
      "commits": 47,
      "insertions": 3200,
      "deletions": 800,
      "sessions": { "claude_code": 15, "codex": 3 }
    }
  ],
  "totals": {
    "commits": 182,
    "insertions": 15300,
    "deletions": 4200,
    "projects": 5,
    "active_days": 6,
    "sessions": { "claude_code": 48, "codex": 8 },
    "global_streak_days": 52,
    "avg_context_switches_per_day": 2.1
  },
  "tweetable": "Week of Mar 14: 5 projects, 182 commits, 15.3k LOC | CC: 48, Codex: 8 | Focus: ostack (58%) | Streak: 52d"
}

---

Compare Mode

When the user runs /retro compare (or /retro compare 14d):

1. Compute metrics for the current window (default 7d) using the midnight-aligned start date (same logic as the main retro — e.g., if today is 2026-03-18 and window is 7d, use --since="2026-03-11T00:00:00")
2. Compute metrics for the immediately prior same-length window using both --since and --until with midnight-aligned dates to avoid overlap (e.g., for a 7d window starting 2026-03-11: prior window is --since="2026-03-04T00:00:00" --until="2026-03-11T00:00:00")
3. Show a side-by-side comparison table with deltas and arrows
4. Write a brief narrative highlighting the biggest improvements and regressions
5. Save only the current-window snapshot to .context/retros/ (same as a normal retro run); do not persist the prior-window metrics.

Tone

• Encouraging but candid, no coddling
• Specific and concrete — always anchor in actual commits/code
• Skip generic praise ("great job!") — say exactly what was good and why
• Frame improvements as leveling up, not criticism
• Praise should feel like something you'd actually say in a 1:1 — specific, earned, genuine
• Growth suggestions should feel like investment advice — "this is worth your time because..." not "you failed at..."
• Never compare teammates against each other negatively. Each person's section stands on its own.
• Keep total output around 3000-4500 words (slightly longer to accommodate team sections)
• Use markdown tables and code blocks for data, prose for narrative
• Output directly to the conversation — do NOT write to filesystem (except the .context/retros/ JSON snapshot)

Important Rules

• ALL narrative output goes directly to the user in the conversation. The ONLY file written is the .context/retros/ JSON snapshot.
• Use origin/<default> for all git queries (not local main which may be stale)
• Display all timestamps in the user's local timezone (do not override TZ)
• If the window has zero commits, say so and suggest a different window
• Round LOC/hour to nearest 50
• Treat merge commits as PR boundaries
• Do not read CLAUDE.md or other docs — this skill is self-contained
• On first run (no prior retros), skip comparison sections gracefully
• Global mode: Does NOT require being inside a git repo. Saves snapshots to ~/.ostack/retros/ (not .context/retros/). Gracefully skip AI tools that aren't installed. Only compare against prior global retros with the same window value. If streak hits 365d cap, display as "365+ days".