Skip to main content
building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking Builds SOC performance metrics and KPI tracking dashboards measuring Mean Time to Detect (MTTD), Mean Time to Respond (MTTR), alert quality ratios, analyst productivity, and detection coverage using SIEM data. Use when SOC leadership needs operational visibility, continuous improvement tracking, or executive-level reporting on security operations effectiveness.
インストールへ移動 Skills Marketplace コミュニティが作成したAIスキルを発見・探索
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-trackingコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Zipをダウンロード ダウンロード中... このリポジトリの他の Skills abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
name building-soc-metrics-and-kpi-tracking description Builds SOC performance metrics and KPI tracking dashboards measuring Mean Time to Detect (MTTD), Mean Time to Respond (MTTR), alert quality ratios, analyst productivity, and detection coverage using SIEM data. Use when SOC leadership needs operational visibility, continuous improvement tracking, or executive-level reporting on security operations effectiveness.
domain cybersecurity subdomain soc-operations tags ["soc","metrics","kpi","mttd","mttr","dashboard","reporting","continuous-improvement"] version 1.0 author mahipal license Apache-2.0 nist_ai_rmf ["MEASURE-2.7","MAP-5.1","MANAGE-2.4"] atlas_techniques ["AML.T0070","AML.T0066","AML.T0082"] nist_csf ["DE.CM-01","DE.AE-02","RS.MA-01","DE.AE-06"] mitre_attack ["T1078","T1071"]
Building SOC Metrics and KPI Tracking
When to Use
Use this skill when:
SOC leadership needs data-driven visibility into operational performance
Continuous improvement programs require baseline measurements and trend tracking
Executive reporting demands quantified security posture and ROI metrics
Staffing decisions need objective workload and capacity data
Compliance audits require documented SOC performance evidence
Do not use metrics as punitive measures against analysts — metrics should drive process improvement, not individual performance management.
Prerequisites
SIEM with 90+ days of incident and alert disposition data
Incident ticketing system (ServiceNow, Jira) with timestamp data for incident lifecycle
Analyst shift schedules and staffing data
ATT&CK Navigator for detection coverage tracking
Dashboard platform (Splunk, Grafana, or Power BI)
Workflow
Step 1: Define Core SOC Metrics Framework
Establish the key metrics aligned to NIST CSF functions:
Metric Definition Target NIST CSF MTTD Time from threat occurrence to SOC detection <15 min Detect MTTA Time from alert to analyst acknowledgment <5 min Respond MTTI Time from acknowledgment to investigation start <10 min Respond MTTC Time from investigation to containment <1 hour Respond MTTR Time from detection to full resolution <4 hours Recover FP Rate Percentage of false positive alerts <30% Detect TP Rate Percentage of true positive alerts >40% Detect Coverage ATT&CK techniques with active detection >60% Detect Dwell Time Attacker time in network before detection <24 hours Detect Escalation Rate % of Tier 1 alerts escalated to Tier 2/3 15-25% Respond
Step 2: Implement MTTD/MTTR Measurement Mean Time to Detect (MTTD):
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttd_seconds = _time - orig_time
| where mttd_seconds > 0 AND mttd_seconds < 86400 --- Exclude data quality issues
| stats avg(mttd_seconds) AS avg_mttd,
median(mttd_seconds) AS med_mttd,
perc90(mttd_seconds) AS p90_mttd,
perc95(mttd_seconds) AS p95_mttd
by urgency
| eval avg_mttd_min = round(avg_mttd / 60, 1)
| eval med_mttd_min = round(med_mttd / 60, 1)
| eval p90_mttd_min = round(p90_mttd / 60, 1)
| table urgency, avg_mttd_min, med_mttd_min, p90_mttd_min
Mean Time to Respond (MTTR):
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttr_seconds = status_end - _time
| where mttr_seconds > 0 AND mttr_seconds < 604800 --- <7 days
| stats avg(mttr_seconds) AS avg_mttr,
median(mttr_seconds) AS med_mttr,
perc90(mttr_seconds) AS p90_mttr
by urgency
| eval avg_mttr_hours = round(avg_mttr / 3600, 1)
| eval med_mttr_hours = round(med_mttr / 3600, 1)
| eval p90_mttr_hours = round(p90_mttr / 3600, 1)
| table urgency, avg_mttr_hours, med_mttr_hours, p90_mttr_hours
MTTD/MTTR Trend Over Time:
index=notable earliest=-90d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttd_min = (_time - orig_time) / 60
| eval mttr_hours = (status_end - _time) / 3600
| bin _time span=1w
| stats avg(mttd_min) AS avg_mttd_min, avg(mttr_hours) AS avg_mttr_hours,
count AS incidents by _time
| table _time, incidents, avg_mttd_min, avg_mttr_hours
Step 3: Measure Alert Quality and Analyst Productivity Alert Disposition Analysis:
index=notable earliest=-30d
| stats count AS total,
sum(eval(if(status_label="Resolved - True Positive", 1, 0))) AS tp,
sum(eval(if(status_label="Resolved - False Positive", 1, 0))) AS fp,
sum(eval(if(status_label="Resolved - Benign", 1, 0))) AS benign,
sum(eval(if(status_label="New" OR status_label="In Progress", 1, 0))) AS pending
| eval tp_rate = round(tp / total * 100, 1)
| eval fp_rate = round(fp / total * 100, 1)
| eval signal_noise = round(tp / (fp + 0.01), 2)
| table total, tp, fp, benign, pending, tp_rate, fp_rate, signal_noise
Analyst Productivity Metrics:
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| stats count AS alerts_resolved,
avg(eval((status_end - status_transition_time) / 60)) AS avg_triage_min,
dc(rule_name) AS unique_rule_types
by owner
| eval alerts_per_day = round(alerts_resolved / 30, 1)
| sort - alerts_resolved
| table owner, alerts_resolved, alerts_per_day, avg_triage_min, unique_rule_types
Shift-Based Workload Distribution:
index=notable earliest=-30d
| eval hour = strftime(_time, "%H")
| eval shift = case(
hour >= 6 AND hour < 14, "Day (06-14)",
hour >= 14 AND hour < 22, "Swing (14-22)",
1=1, "Night (22-06)"
)
| stats count AS alerts, dc(owner) AS analysts by shift
| eval alerts_per_analyst = round(alerts / analysts / 30, 1)
| table shift, alerts, analysts, alerts_per_analyst
Step 4: Track Detection Coverage | inputlookup detection_rules_attack_mapping.csv
| stats dc(technique_id) AS covered_techniques by tactic
| join tactic type=left [
| inputlookup attack_techniques_total.csv
| stats dc(technique_id) AS total_techniques by tactic
]
| eval coverage_pct = round(covered_techniques / total_techniques * 100, 1)
| sort tactic
| table tactic, covered_techniques, total_techniques, coverage_pct
| inputlookup expected_data_sources.csv
| join data_source type=left [
| tstats count where index=* by sourcetype
| rename sourcetype AS data_source
| eval status = "Active"
]
| eval source_status = if(isnotnull(status), "Collecting", "MISSING")
| stats count by source_status
| table source_status, count
Step 5: Build Executive Reporting Dashboard Monthly SOC Executive Summary:
--- Incident summary by category
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| stats count by urgency
| eval order = case(urgency="critical", 1, urgency="high", 2, urgency="medium", 3,
urgency="low", 4, urgency="informational", 5)
| sort order
--- Month-over-month comparison
index=notable earliest=-60d
| eval period = if(_time > relative_time(now(), "-30d"), "This Month", "Last Month")
| stats count by period, urgency
| chart sum(count) AS incidents by urgency, period
--- Top 5 incident categories
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved - True Positive"
| top rule_name limit=5
| table rule_name, count, percent
Security Posture Scorecard:
| makeresults
| eval metrics = mvappend(
"MTTD: 8.3 min (Target: <15 min) | STATUS: GREEN",
"MTTR: 3.2 hours (Target: <4 hours) | STATUS: GREEN",
"FP Rate: 27% (Target: <30%) | STATUS: GREEN",
"Detection Coverage: 64% (Target: >60%) | STATUS: GREEN",
"Analyst Utilization: 78% (Target: 60-80%) | STATUS: GREEN",
"Incident Backlog: 12 (Target: <20) | STATUS: GREEN"
)
| mvexpand metrics
| table metrics
Step 6: Implement Continuous Improvement Tracking Track improvement initiatives and their impact:
--- Improvement initiative tracking
| inputlookup soc_improvement_initiatives.csv
| eval status_color = case(
status="Completed", "green",
status="In Progress", "yellow",
status="Planned", "gray"
)
| table initiative, start_date, target_date, status, metric_impact, baseline, current
initiative,start_date,target_date,status,metric_impact,baseline,current
Risk-Based Alerting,2024-01-15,2024-03-15,Completed,Alert Volume,-84%,287/day
Sigma Rule Library,2024-02-01,2024-04-01,In Progress,ATT&CK Coverage,61%,64%
SOAR Phishing Playbook,2024-02-15,2024-03-30,In Progress,Phishing MTTR,45min,18min
Analyst Training Program,2024-01-01,2024-06-30,In Progress,TP Rate,31%,41%
Key Concepts Term Definition MTTD Mean Time to Detect — average time from threat occurrence to SOC alert generation MTTR Mean Time to Respond — average time from detection to incident resolution MTTA Mean Time to Acknowledge — average time from alert generation to analyst assignment Signal-to-Noise Ratio Ratio of true positive alerts to total alerts — higher is better Dwell Time Duration an attacker remains undetected in the environment — key indicator of detection effectiveness Analyst Utilization Percentage of analyst time spent on productive investigation vs. overhead tasks
Tools & Systems
Splunk Dashboard Studio : Advanced visualization framework for building interactive SOC metric dashboardsGrafana : Open-source analytics and visualization platform supporting multiple data sourcesPower BI : Microsoft business intelligence tool for executive-level reporting and trend analysisATT&CK Navigator : MITRE tool for visualizing detection coverage as layered heatmapsServiceNow Performance Analytics : ITSM analytics module for tracking incident lifecycle metrics
Common Scenarios
Quarterly Business Review : Present MTTD/MTTR trends, detection coverage growth, and alert quality improvementsStaffing Justification : Use workload metrics to justify additional analyst headcount or shift adjustmentsTool ROI Assessment : Compare alert quality and response times before and after new tool deploymentCompliance Evidence : Provide documented SOC performance metrics for ISO 27001 or SOC 2 auditsVendor Comparison : Benchmark SOC metrics against industry peers using surveys (SANS, Ponemon)
Output Format SOC PERFORMANCE REPORT — March 2024
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
KEY METRICS:
Metric Current Target Trend Status
MTTD 8.3 min <15 min -12% GREEN
MTTR 3.2 hrs <4 hrs -18% GREEN
FP Rate 27% <30% -5% GREEN
TP Rate 41% >40% +3% GREEN
ATT&CK Coverage 64% >60% +3% GREEN
Alerts/Analyst/Day 24 <50 -84% GREEN
INCIDENT SUMMARY:
Total Incidents: 147 (Critical: 3, High: 23, Medium: 78, Low: 43)
Avg Resolution: 3.2 hours (Critical: 1.8h, High: 2.9h, Medium: 4.1h)
SLA Compliance: 94% (Target: >90%)
IMPROVEMENT HIGHLIGHTS:
[1] RBA deployment reduced daily alerts from 1,847 to 287 (-84%)
[2] New Sigma rules added 12 ATT&CK techniques to coverage
[3] SOAR phishing playbook reduced phishing MTTR by 60%
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT:
[1] Lateral movement detection coverage at 58% (below 60% target)
[2] Night shift MTTD 23% slower than day shift
[3] 4 critical vulnerability scan tickets overdue on SLA
