ワンクリックで
prompt-engineering
Prompt engineering patterns including structured prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, and system prompt design
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Prompt engineering patterns including structured prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, and system prompt design
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use the codebase knowledge graph for structural code queries. Triggers on: explore the codebase, understand the architecture, what functions exist, show me the structure, who calls this function, what does X call, trace the call chain, find callers of, show dependencies, impact analysis, dead code, unused functions, high fan-out, refactor candidates, code quality audit, graph query syntax, Cypher query examples, edge types, how to use search_graph.
UI/UX design intelligence for web and mobile. Includes 50+ styles, 161 color palettes, 57 font pairings, 161 product types, 99 UX guidelines, and 25 chart types across 10 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui, and HTML/CSS). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, and check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, and mobile app. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, and chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, and flat design. Topics: color systems, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, interaction states, shadow, and gradient. Integrations: shadcn/ui MCP for component search and examples.
any input (code, docs, papers, images) → knowledge graph → clustered communities → HTML + JSON + audit report
Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Python, and C/C++. Helps catch bugs, improve code quality, and give constructive feedback. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.
CI/CD pipeline design with GitHub Actions, Docker, Kubernetes, Helm, and GitOps patterns
AWS cloud patterns for Lambda, ECS, S3, DynamoDB, and Infrastructure as Code with CDK/Terraform
| name | prompt-engineering |
| description | Prompt engineering patterns including structured prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, and system prompt design |
You are a senior code reviewer. Your role is to analyze pull requests for:
1. Correctness - logic errors, edge cases, off-by-one errors
2. Security - injection, authentication, data exposure
3. Performance - N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations, missing indexes
4. Maintainability - naming, complexity, test coverage
For each issue found, respond with:
- Severity: critical | warning | suggestion
- File and line reference
- What is wrong
- How to fix it (with code snippet)
If the code is well-written, say so briefly. Do not invent problems.
Structure system prompts with role, scope, output format, and constraints. Be explicit about what the model should NOT do.
Analyze this database query for performance issues.
Think step by step:
1. Identify the tables and joins involved
2. Check if appropriate indexes exist for the WHERE and JOIN conditions
3. Look for full table scans or cartesian products
4. Estimate the row count at each step
5. Suggest specific index creation or query restructuring
Query:
SELECT o.*, u.name, p.title
FROM orders o
JOIN users u ON o.user_id = u.id
JOIN products p ON o.product_id = p.id
WHERE o.created_at > '2024-01-01'
AND u.country = 'US'
ORDER BY o.created_at DESC
LIMIT 50;
Chain-of-thought prompting improves accuracy on reasoning tasks by forcing the model to show intermediate steps.
Convert natural language to SQL. Follow these examples:
Input: "How many orders were placed last month?"
Output: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE created_at >= DATE_TRUNC('month', CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '1 month') AND created_at < DATE_TRUNC('month', CURRENT_DATE);
Input: "Top 5 customers by total spending"
Output: SELECT customer_id, SUM(total_amount) AS total_spent FROM orders GROUP BY customer_id ORDER BY total_spent DESC LIMIT 5;
Input: "Products that have never been ordered"
Output: SELECT p.* FROM products p LEFT JOIN order_items oi ON p.id = oi.product_id WHERE oi.id IS NULL;
Now convert:
Input: "Average order value per country for the last quarter"
Provide 3-5 diverse examples that demonstrate the expected format and edge cases.
{
"tools": [
{
"name": "search_codebase",
"description": "Search for code patterns across the repository. Use when you need to find implementations, usages, or definitions.",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Regex pattern or keyword to search for"
},
"file_type": {
"type": "string",
"description": "File extension filter (e.g., 'ts', 'py')"
}
},
"required": ["query"]
}
}
]
}
Write tool descriptions that explain WHEN to use the tool, not just what it does.
def build_review_prompt(diff: str, context: str, rules: list[str]) -> str:
rules_text = "\n".join(f"- {rule}" for rule in rules)
return f"""Review this code diff against the following rules:
{rules_text}
Context about the codebase:
{context}
Diff to review:
```diff
{diff}
```
Respond with a JSON array of findings. If no issues, return an empty array.
Each finding: {{"severity": "critical|warning|info", "line": number, "message": "string", "suggestion": "string"}}"""