ワンクリックで
corvus-phase-5
Final validation - comprehensive objective and subjective checks
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Final validation - comprehensive objective and subjective checks
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Planning (Phase 2), User Approval (Phase 3), and optional High Accuracy Plan Review (Phase 3.5)
Implementation loop - per-phase execution with quality gates
Completion - success extraction and final summary
Follow-up triage - handling requests after feature completion
PR Review Phase R2 - Multi-pass review orchestration (architecture, correctness, security, conventions)
Shared schemas, Conventional Comments spec, config schema, and common templates for Corvus PR Review
| name | corvus-phase-5 |
| description | Final validation - comprehensive objective and subjective checks |
Goal: Comprehensive check of entire implementation with two-step validation.
Phase 5 has two steps:
requires_ux_dx_review: trueDELEGATE TO: @code-quality
**TASK**: Final comprehensive validation of [feature name] implementation
**MASTER PLAN**: `.corvus/tasks/[feature]/MASTER_PLAN.md`
**ALL TASK FILES**: `.corvus/tasks/[feature]/*.md`
**MUST DO**:
When `tests_enabled: true, tests_deferred: false` (default):
- Run FULL test suite (not just affected tests)
- Run production build
- Verify ALL acceptance criteria from ALL task files
- Check for consistency across all changes
- Look for any regressions
- Verify no breaking changes to existing functionality
When `tests_enabled: true, tests_deferred: true` (deferred mode):
- Run FULL test suite — this is the FIRST time tests are executed (they were deferred during Phase 4)
- Run production build
- Verify ALL acceptance criteria from ALL task files
- Check for consistency across all changes
- Look for any regressions
- Verify no breaking changes to existing functionality
- Report clearly that this is the deferred test run
When `tests_enabled: false` (acceptance-only mode):
- Run production build
- Verify ALL acceptance criteria from ALL task files (with concrete evidence)
- Check for consistency across all changes
- Look for any regressions via code review
- Verify no breaking changes to existing functionality
- Do NOT attempt to run tests or report missing tests as a gap
**REPORT BACK**:
When `tests_enabled: true, tests_deferred: false`:
- **5a OBJECTIVE GATE STATUS**: PASS / FAIL
- Test results: [N]/[M] passing
- Build status: PASS/FAIL
- Acceptance criteria: [N]/[M] met (list any failures)
- Regressions found: [list or none]
- Any remaining issues (with severity)
When `tests_enabled: true, tests_deferred: true` (deferred mode):
- **5a OBJECTIVE GATE STATUS**: PASS / FAIL
- **Mode**: DEFERRED TEST RUN (first test execution)
- Test results: [N]/[M] passing
- Build status: PASS/FAIL
- Acceptance criteria: [N]/[M] met (list any failures)
- Regressions found: [list or none]
- Any remaining issues (with severity)
- Note: Tests were deferred from Phase 4 quality gates
When `tests_enabled: false`:
- **5a OBJECTIVE GATE STATUS**: PASS / FAIL
- **Mode**: ACCEPTANCE-ONLY
- Build status: PASS/FAIL
- Acceptance criteria: [N]/[M] met (list any failures with evidence)
- Regressions found: [list or none] (via code review)
- Any remaining issues (with severity)
Decision Point after 5a:
Note: Decision logic is identical regardless of
tests_enabledortests_deferred. The gate always produces PASS/FAIL; only the evidence model differs. Whentests_deferred: true, Phase 5a uses the full test+acceptance model (same astests_enabled: true, tests_deferred: false).
WHEN TO INVOKE: If ANY task in the feature had requires_ux_dx_review: true
This aggregates all UX/DX review requirements from individual tasks into a single feature-level review.
DELEGATE TO: @ux-dx-quality
**TASK**: Final UX/DX review of [feature name] implementation
**MASTER PLAN**: `.corvus/tasks/[feature]/MASTER_PLAN.md`
**TASKS REQUIRING UX/DX REVIEW**:
- Task NN: [name] - [focus area: UI/API/docs/architecture]
- Task NN: [name] - [focus area]
**SCOPE**: All user-facing and developer-facing changes in this feature
**MUST DO**:
- Assess overall user experience quality
- Assess overall developer experience quality
- Assess documentation quality and completeness
- Assess architectural coherence across all changes
- Verify consistency of patterns across the feature
**MUST NOT DO**:
- Re-check objective criteria (already passed in 5a)
- Fix issues directly
**REPORT BACK**:
- **5b SUBJECTIVE GATE STATUS**: PASS / FAIL
- Overall UX assessment
- Overall DX assessment
- Documentation assessment
- Architecture assessment
- Strengths identified
- Issues requiring fixes (if FAIL)
Decision Point after 5b: