systematic-debugging

name	systematic-debugging
classification	passive
description	Structured debugging workflow. Use when encountering bugs, test failures, or unexpected behaviour. Reproduce, isolate, hypothesise, verify, fix, regression test.

Systematic Debugging

A structured approach to diagnosing and fixing defects. Follow these steps in order — do not skip to a fix before understanding the cause.

Workflow

1. Reproduce

• Confirm the failure with a concrete, repeatable case
• If a test fails, run it in isolation to rule out ordering effects
• Capture the exact error message, stack trace, or unexpected output

2. Isolate

• Narrow the scope: which module, function, or layer is responsible?
• Use binary search: comment out or bypass sections to locate the boundary
• Check recent changes (git diff, git log) for likely introduction points

3. Hypothesise

• Form a specific, falsifiable hypothesis: "X fails because Y returns Z when it should return W"
• Avoid vague hypotheses like "something is wrong with the config"
• Write the hypothesis down (napkin, comment, or PR note)

4. Verify

• Write a test that confirms the hypothesis (red phase of TDD)
• If the test passes when it should fail, the hypothesis is wrong — return to step 3
• Do not proceed to a fix until the test demonstrates the defect

5. Fix

• Make the minimal change that makes the failing test pass
• Avoid fixing adjacent issues in the same change — one fix per defect

6. Regression test

• Run the full test suite, not just the new test
• Confirm no existing tests broke
• If the fix is in a shared module, check downstream consumers

References

• .agent/directives/principles.md — TDD discipline, fail-fast principles
• .agent/directives/testing-strategy.md — test pyramid, isolation requirements