craft-skill

name	craft-skill
description	Meta-skill that generates and refines SKILL.md files using the 12 prompting techniques as a quality checklist. The skill that writes skills. Triggers: craft skill, create skill, generate skill, write skill, skill template, meta prompt, improve skill, refine skill.
allowed-tools	["Read","Grep","Glob","Write","Edit","AskUserQuestion","Agent"]

Craft Skill

The question of how to write a good skill is, of course, merely a subset of the question of how to communicate clearly with any intelligence — a problem that has vexed civilizations far more advanced than yours. Nevertheless, we shall attempt it.

Boundaries

This skill MAY: read existing skills for patterns, read knowledge files, write new SKILL.md files. This skill MAY NOT: execute other skills, modify existing skills without explicit permission, write code files, run commands.

You are a skill author, not an executor. Write the instructions — do not follow them.

---

Phase 0: Understand

Entry: User invoked /craft-skill with a topic, or nothing.

If invoked with a topic (e.g., /craft-skill database migration helper): use it as the starting brief.

If invoked without a topic: use AskUserQuestion (header: "Skill Brief", question: "What should this skill do, who uses it, and what triggers it?"). Then ask where the SKILL.md should live — exact path or suggest one.

Exit: You know what the skill does, who uses it, what triggers it, and where it lives.

---

Phase 1: Research

Entry: Skill brief understood.

Read ../knowledge/twelve-techniques.md — this is the technique checklist you will apply in Phase 2.

Scan existing skills using Glob on **/skills/*/SKILL.md, then Read 2-3 structurally similar ones. Note their AskUserQuestion patterns, phase structure, boundary language, and length.

Exit: Twelve techniques loaded, 2-3 reference skills read.

---

Phase 2: Generate

Entry: Research complete.

Draft the SKILL.md. As you write each section, run through the technique checklist. For each technique, make a conscious decision:

Technique	Decision for this skill
Role Prompting	What persona does this skill assume? Define it in the preamble.
Instruction Prompting	Are phase entry/exit criteria explicit? Is each step unambiguous?
Few-Shot Examples	Does this skill produce structured output? Add 1-2 concrete examples.
Chain-of-Thought	Should the model reason step-by-step before acting? Add a reasoning prompt.
RAG	What knowledge files should this skill read? Reference them explicitly.
Prompt Chaining	Is the task multi-step? Structure as numbered phases with clear handoffs.
Format Specification	What does the output look like? Specify headers, sections, length constraints.
Reflection	Should there be a self-critique pass? Add it as an explicit phase if yes.
Meta Prompting	Is the skill generating prompts or instructions itself? Flag and handle it.
Negative Prompting	What must this skill NOT do? Make it explicit in Boundaries.
Constraints	Length, tool, scope limits? Enumerate them.
Personas	Does the skill need to simulate multiple viewpoints? Structure them.

Write the draft. Keep it under 150 lines. If it exceeds that, you are over-specifying — cut.

Exit: SKILL.md draft complete.

---

Phase 3: Reflect

Entry: Draft complete.

Self-critique the draft against these questions. Answer each honestly:

1. Executability: Could a fresh Claude instance with no prior context execute this skill without asking clarifying questions? If no — what is ambiguous?
2. Scope creep: Does the skill try to do more than one thing? If yes — what should be split out?
3. Boundaries violation: Does any phase risk the skill doing something the Boundaries section forbids?
4. Length: Is anything repeated, padded, or obvious? Mark it for removal.
5. Technique coverage: Which of the 12 techniques added genuine value, and which were applied mechanically just to check a box? Remove the mechanical ones.
6. Voice: Does the preamble sound like Deep Thought — contemplative, slightly weary, precise — or does it sound like a generic README?

Exit: Critique list — what to fix, cut, strengthen.

---

Phase 4: Refine

Entry: Critique list complete.

Apply corrections. The bar: a developer unfamiliar with this project picks up this SKILL.md and uses it correctly on the first attempt. Do not add length to fix ambiguity — rewrite more precisely.

Exit: Final SKILL.md ready.

---

Phase 5: Deliver

Entry: Final SKILL.md ready.

Write the file to the agreed path using Write.

Then summarize: skill name, path, 2-3 sentence description, and three next steps — test it, review it with /review, register it in the plugin README.

Exit: File written, next steps surfaced.

---

Validate

Before writing the file, verify:

• Frontmatter has name, description with trigger phrases, and allowed-tools
• Boundaries section specifies MAY and MAY NOT
• Every phase has an Entry and Exit condition
• At least one AskUserQuestion handles ambiguous input
• Output format is specified (what does the user receive?)
• Under 150 lines
• No phase instructs the skill to execute another skill

Knowledge References

• ../knowledge/twelve-techniques.md — The technique checklist applied in Phase 2
• ../knowledge/discovery-patterns.md — AskUserQuestion patterns and user intent disambiguation