titan-close

name	titan-close
description	Split branch commits into focused PRs, compile issue tracker, generate final report with before/after metrics (Titan Paradigm Phase 5)
argument-hint	<--dry-run to preview without creating PRs>
allowed-tools	Bash, Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Edit

Titan CLOSE — PR Splitting & Final Report

You are running the CLOSE phase of the Titan Paradigm.

Your goal: analyze all commits on the current branch, split them into focused PRs for easier review, compile the issue tracker from all phases, capture final metrics, and generate a comprehensive audit report.

Context budget: This phase reads artifacts and git history. Keep codegraph queries targeted — only for final metrics comparison.

Dry-run mode: If $ARGUMENTS contains --dry-run, preview the PR split plan and report without creating PRs or pushing branches.

---

Step 0 — Pre-flight: find and consolidate the Titan session

1. Locate the Titan session. All prior phases (RECON → GAUNTLET → SYNC → GATE) may have run across different worktrees or branches. You need to consolidate their work.

   git worktree list
   

   For each worktree, check for Titan artifacts:

   ls <worktree-path>/.codegraph/titan/titan-state.json 2>/dev/null
   

   Also check branches (including remote):

   git branch -a --list '*titan*'
   git branch -a --list '*refactor/*'
   

   Decision logic:

   • Found exactly one worktree/branch with titan-state.json: Read its currentPhase. If it's "sync" or later, this is the right session. Merge its branch into your worktree.
   • Found a worktree but currentPhase is earlier than expected (e.g., "recon" or "gauntlet"): The pipeline may not be complete. Keep searching — there may be a more advanced worktree. If nothing better found, ask the user: "Found Titan state at <path> with phase <phase>. The pipeline appears incomplete. Continue anyway, or should I look elsewhere?"
   • Found multiple worktrees with titan-state.json: List them all with currentPhase, lastUpdated, and branch name. The Titan pipeline may have been split across worktrees (RECON in one, GAUNTLET in another). Merge them in phase order into your worktree. If there's ambiguity (e.g., two worktrees at the same phase), ask the user.
   • Found branches but no worktrees: Merge the titan branch(es) in phase order: git merge <branch> --no-edit
   • Found nothing: Stop: "No Titan session found in any worktree or branch. Run /titan-recon first."

2. Ensure worktree isolation:

   git rev-parse --show-toplevel && git worktree list
   

   If not in a worktree, stop: "Run /worktree first."

3. Sync with main:

   git fetch origin main && git merge origin/main --no-edit
   

   If there are merge conflicts, stop: "Merge conflict detected. Resolve conflicts and re-run /titan-close."

4. Load artifacts. Read:

   • .codegraph/titan/titan-state.json — session state, baseline metrics, progress
   • .codegraph/titan/GLOBAL_ARCH.md — architecture document
   • .codegraph/titan/gauntlet.ndjson — full per-target audit data (pillar verdicts, metrics, violations)
   • .codegraph/titan/gauntlet-summary.json — audit result totals
   • .codegraph/titan/sync.json — execution plan (commit grouping)
   • .codegraph/titan/gate-log.ndjson — validation history (may not exist if gate wasn't run)
   • .codegraph/titan/issues.ndjson — issue tracker from all phases
   • .codegraph/titan/arch-snapshot.json — pre-forge architectural snapshot (communities, structure, drift). Use for before/after comparison in the Metrics section. May not exist if capture failed.
   • .codegraph/titan/drift-report.json — cumulative drift reports from all phases. May not exist if no drift was detected.

   If titan-state.json is missing after the search, stop: "No Titan session found. Run /titan-recon first."

   When called from /titan-run: The orchestrator already ensured worktree isolation, synced with main, and all artifacts are in the current worktree. Steps 0.1–0.3 (worktree search, isolation check, main sync) can be skipped if the orchestrator tells you to skip them.

5. Detect version. Extract from package.json:

   node -e "console.log(require('./package.json').version)"
   

---

Step 1 — Drift detection: final staleness assessment

CLOSE is the last phase — it must assess the full pipeline's freshness before generating the report.

1. Compare main SHA:

   git rev-parse origin/main
   

   Compare against titan-state.json → mainSHA.

2. If main has advanced, calculate full drift:

   git rev-list --count <mainSHA>..origin/main
   git diff --name-only <mainSHA>..origin/main
   

3. Read all prior drift reports from .codegraph/titan/drift-report.json (a JSON array of entries, one per phase that detected drift). This shows the cumulative drift across the pipeline.

4. Assess overall pipeline freshness:

   Level	Condition	Action
   fresh	mainSHA matches current main, no drift reports with severity > low	Generate report normally
   acceptable	Some drift detected but phases handled it (re-audited stale targets)	Generate report — note drift in Executive Summary
   stale	Significant unaddressed drift: >10 commits behind, >20% of audited targets changed on main since audit	Warn user: "Pipeline results are partially stale. N targets were modified on main after being audited. The report will flag these. Consider re-running /titan-gauntlet for affected targets before finalizing."
   expired	>50 commits behind OR >50% of targets changed OR architecture-level changes (new directories in src/)	Stop: "Pipeline results are too stale to produce a reliable report. Run /titan-recon for a fresh baseline."

5. Write final drift assessment to the drift report (same schema, "detectedBy": "close").

6. Include drift summary in the report. The final report's Executive Summary and Recommendations sections must reflect any staleness. Stale targets should be called out in a "Staleness Warnings" subsection.

---

Step 2 — Collect branch commit history

git log main..HEAD --oneline --no-merges
git log main..HEAD --format="%H %s" --no-merges

Extract: total commit count, commit messages, SHAs. If zero commits, stop: "No commits on this branch. Nothing to close."

For each commit, get the files changed:

git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r <sha>

---

Step 3 — Classify commits into PR groups

Analyze commit messages and changed files to group commits into focused PRs. Each PR should address a single concern for easier review.

Grouping strategy (in priority order)

Use sync.json execution phases as the primary guide if available:

1. Dead code cleanup — commits removing dead symbols
   • PR title: chore: remove dead code identified by Titan audit
2. Shared abstractions — commits extracting interfaces/utilities
   • PR title: refactor: extract <abstraction> from <source>
3. Cycle breaks — commits resolving circular dependencies
   • PR title: refactor: break circular dependency in <domain>
4. Decompositions — commits splitting complex functions/files
   • PR title: refactor: decompose <target> in <domain>
5. Quality fixes — commits addressing fail-level violations
   • Group by domain: fix: address quality issues in <domain>
6. Warning improvements — commits addressing warn-level issues
   • Group by domain: refactor: improve code quality in <domain>

Fallback grouping (if no sync.json)

Group by changed file paths — commits touching the same directory/domain go together. Use commit message prefixes (fix:, refactor:, chore:) as secondary signals.

Rules for grouping

• A PR should touch one domain where possible
• A PR should address one concern (don't mix dead code removal with refactors)
• Order PRs so dependencies come first (if PR B depends on PR A's changes, A merges first)
• Each PR must be independently reviewable — no PR should break the build alone
• If a commit touches files across multiple concerns, assign it to the primary concern and note the cross-cutting nature in the PR description

Record the grouping plan:

[
  {
    "pr": 1,
    "title": "...",
    "concern": "dead_code|abstraction|cycle_break|decomposition|quality_fix|warning",
    "domain": "<domain name>",
    "commits": ["<sha1>", "<sha2>"],
    "files": ["<file1>", "<file2>"],
    "dependsOn": [],
    "description": "..."
  }
]

---

Step 4 — Capture final metrics

Rebuild the graph and collect current metrics:

codegraph build
codegraph stats --json
codegraph complexity --health --above-threshold -T --json --limit 50
codegraph roles --role dead -T --json
codegraph roles --role core -T --json
codegraph cycles --json

Extract: totalNodes, totalEdges, totalFiles, qualityScore, functions above threshold, dead symbol count, core symbol count, cycle count.

Also get the worst offenders for comparison:

codegraph complexity --health --sort effort -T --json --limit 10
codegraph complexity --health --sort bugs -T --json --limit 10
codegraph complexity --health --sort mi -T --json --limit 10

Architecture comparison (if arch-snapshot.json exists)

If .codegraph/titan/arch-snapshot.json was captured before forge, compare its structure data against current codegraph structure --depth 2 --json output. Report cohesion changes per directory (improved / degraded / unchanged). Include in the "Metrics: Before & After" section of the report.

Compute deltas

Compare final metrics against titan-state.json baseline:

Metric	Baseline	Final	Delta
Quality Score	from state	from stats	+/-
Functions above threshold	from state	from complexity	+/-
Dead symbols	from state	from roles	+/-
Cycles	from state	from cycles	+/-
Total nodes	from state	from stats	+/-

---

Step 5 — Compile the issue tracker

Read .codegraph/titan/issues.ndjson. Each line is a JSON object:

{"phase": "recon|gauntlet|sync|gate", "timestamp": "ISO 8601", "severity": "bug|limitation|suggestion", "category": "codegraph|tooling|process|codebase", "description": "...", "context": "optional detail"}

Group issues by category and severity. Summarize:

• Codegraph bugs: issues with codegraph itself (wrong output, crashes, missing features)
• Tooling issues: problems with the Titan pipeline or other tools
• Process notes: suggestions for improving the Titan workflow
• Codebase observations: structural concerns beyond what the audit covered

---

Step 6 — Compile the gate log

Read .codegraph/titan/gate-log.ndjson. Summarize:

• Total gate runs
• Pass / Warn / Fail counts
• Rollbacks triggered
• Most common failure reasons

---

Step 7 — Generate the report

Report path

generated/titan/titan-report-v<version>-<date>T<time>.md

Where:

• <version> is the package.json version (e.g., 3.1.5)
• <date> is YYYY-MM-DD
• <time> is HH-MM-SS (local time, hyphen-separated for filesystem safety)

Example: generated/titan/titan-report-v3.1.5-2026-03-17T14-30-00.md

mkdir -p generated/titan

Report structure

Write the report as Markdown:

# Titan Audit Report

**Version:** <package version>
**Date:** <start date> → <end date>
**Branch:** <branch name>
**Target:** <resolved path>

---

## Executive Summary

<2-3 sentences: what was audited, key outcomes, overall health change>

---

## Pipeline Timeline

| Phase | Started | Completed | Duration |
|-------|---------|-----------|----------|
| RECON | <from state> | <from state> | — |
| GAUNTLET | — | — | — |
| SYNC | — | — | — |
| GATE (runs) | — | — | — |
| CLOSE | <now> | <now> | — |

---

## Metrics: Before & After

| Metric | Baseline | Final | Delta | Trend |
|--------|----------|-------|-------|-------|
| Quality Score | X | Y | +/-Z | arrow |
| Total Files | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Total Symbols | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Functions Above Threshold | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Dead Symbols | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Cycle Count | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Avg Halstead Bugs | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Avg Maintainability Index | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Complexity Improvement: Top Movers

<Table of functions that improved the most — dropped below thresholds or reduced halstead.bugs>

### Remaining Hot Spots

<Table of functions still above thresholds — carried forward for next Titan run>

---

## Audit Results Summary

**Targets audited:** <N>
**Pass:** <N> | **Warn:** <N> | **Fail:** <N> | **Decompose:** <N>

### By Pillar

| Pillar | Pass | Warn | Fail |
|--------|------|------|------|
| I — Structural Purity | ... | ... | ... |
| II — Data & Type Sovereignty | ... | ... | ... |
| III — Ecosystem Synergy | ... | ... | ... |
| IV — Quality Vigil | ... | ... | ... |

### Most Common Violations

<Top 5 violation types with counts>

---

## Changes Made

### Commits: <total count>

<Table: SHA (short), message, files changed, domain>

### PR Split Plan

| PR # | Title | Concern | Domain | Commits | Files | Depends On |
|------|-------|---------|--------|---------|-------|------------|
| 1 | ... | ... | ... | N | N | — |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... | N | N | PR #1 |

---

## Gate Validation History

**Total runs:** <N>
**Pass:** <N> | **Warn:** <N> | **Fail:** <N>
**Rollbacks:** <N>

### Failure Patterns
<Most common failure reasons>

---

## Issues Discovered

### Codegraph Bugs (<count>)
<List with severity, description, context>

### Tooling Issues (<count>)
<List>

### Process Suggestions (<count>)
<List>

### Codebase Observations (<count>)
<List>

---

## Domains Analyzed

<From GLOBAL_ARCH.md — domain map with final status>

---

## Pipeline Freshness

**Main at RECON:** <mainSHA short>
**Main at CLOSE:** <current SHA short>
**Commits behind:** <N>
**Overall staleness:** <fresh|acceptable|stale>

### Drift Events
<Table from drift-report.json: phase, staleness level, impacted targets, action taken>

### Stale Targets
<List of targets whose audit results may not reflect current main — carried forward for next run>

---

## Recommendations for Next Run

<Based on remaining hot spots, unresolved issues, staleness, and patterns observed>

---

Step 8 — Create PRs (unless --dry-run)

If $ARGUMENTS contains --dry-run:

• Print the PR split plan as a table
• Print the report path
• Stop: "Dry-run complete. Review the plan and report, then re-run /titan-close to create PRs."

Otherwise, for each PR group (in dependency order):

8a. Create a branch for each PR

git checkout -b titan/<concern>/<domain> main

8b. Cherry-pick the commits

git cherry-pick <sha1> <sha2> ...

If a cherry-pick conflicts:

1. Note the conflict in the report
2. Skip the problematic commit: git cherry-pick --skip
3. Add the skipped commit to the next PR or flag for manual resolution

8c. Push and create the PR

git push -u origin titan/<concern>/<domain>

gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<bullets from the grouping plan>

## Titan Audit Context
- **Phase:** <concern>
- **Domain:** <domain>
- **Commits:** <count>
- **Depends on:** <PR #N or "none">

## Changes
<file list with brief descriptions>

## Metrics Impact
<relevant before/after metrics for files in this PR>

## Test plan
- [ ] CI passes (lint + build + tests)
- [ ] codegraph check --cycles --boundaries passes
- [ ] No new functions above complexity thresholds
EOF
)"

Record each PR URL.

8d. Return to the original branch

git checkout <original-branch>

---

Step 9 — Update the report with PR URLs

Edit the report to add the actual PR URLs to the PR split plan table.

Also write a machine-readable summary:

Write .codegraph/titan/close-summary.json:

{
  "phase": "close",
  "timestamp": "<ISO 8601>",
  "version": "<package version>",
  "branch": "<branch name>",
  "reportPath": "generated/titan/<report-name>.md",
  "metrics": {
    "baseline": { "qualityScore": 0, "functionsAboveThreshold": 0, "deadSymbols": 0, "cycles": 0 },
    "final": { "qualityScore": 0, "functionsAboveThreshold": 0, "deadSymbols": 0, "cycles": 0 }
  },
  "audit": { "totalAudited": 0, "pass": 0, "warn": 0, "fail": 0, "decompose": 0 },
  "gate": { "totalRuns": 0, "pass": 0, "warn": 0, "fail": 0, "rollbacks": 0 },
  "issues": { "codegraph": 0, "tooling": 0, "process": 0, "codebase": 0 },
  "prs": [
    { "number": 0, "url": "<url>", "title": "<title>", "concern": "<type>", "domain": "<domain>", "commits": 0 }
  ],
  "commits": { "total": 0, "cherryPickFailures": 0 }
}

---

Step 10 — Final cleanup

1. Update titan-state.json: set currentPhase to "close", update lastUpdated.

2. Snapshot cleanup: If the pipeline is fully complete (all PRs created):

   codegraph snapshot delete titan-baseline 2>/dev/null
   

   Delete any remaining batch snapshots.

3. Titan reports are committed to the repo (not gitignored). The generated/titan/ directory is tracked so reports are preserved in git history.

---

Step 11 — Report to user

Print:

TITAN CLOSE — Pipeline Complete

Report: generated/titan/<report-name>.md

Metrics Delta:
  Quality Score: X → Y (+Z)
  Functions above threshold: X → Y (-Z)
  Dead symbols: X → Y (-Z)

Audit: <N> audited — <P> pass, <W> warn, <F> fail
Gate:  <N> runs — <P> pass, <W> warn, <F> fail, <R> rollbacks
Issues: <N> logged (<B> codegraph bugs, <T> tooling, <S> suggestions)

PRs Created: <N>
  #1: <title> (<url>)
  #2: <title> (<url>)
  ...

Merge order: PR #1 → #2 → #3 (respect dependencies)

Next: merge PRs in order, then /titan-reset to clean up artifacts.

---

Rules

• Always use --json and -T on codegraph commands.
• Never paste raw JSON into your response — parse and extract.
• Dry-run is safe. Only --dry-run omission triggers branch creation and PR submission.
• Cherry-pick failures are noted, not fatal. Skipped commits get flagged in the report.
• One PR = one concern. Never mix dead code removal with refactors in the same PR.
• Dependency order matters. Create and label PRs so reviewers know the merge sequence.
• The report is the deliverable. It must be comprehensive enough for someone who wasn't present to understand what happened.
• Issue tracker is append-only. Never modify issues from other phases — only compile them.

Self-Improvement

This skill lives at .claude/skills/titan-close/SKILL.md. Adjust PR grouping logic or report structure after dogfooding.