Skip to main content

create-a-responsibility-matrix

Clarify ownership, decision authority, contribution, consultation, and notification for shared work. Use when roles overlap, gaps persist, or handoffs are failing.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
protosphinx/sphinxstack
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年7月29日 13:55
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
3
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
2 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
create-a-responsibility-matrix
category
data
description
Clarify ownership, decision authority, contribution, consultation, and notification for shared work. Use when roles overlap, gaps persist, or handoffs are failing.
# create-a-responsibility-matrix Map real decisions and deliverables, not job titles alone. Use the matrix to resolve ambiguity, then test it on actual work. ## Procedure 1. Define the project or process boundary, intended users, and the responsibility vocabulary to use. 2. List meaningful decisions, deliverables, controls, and recurring operations as rows. 3. List roles rather than individual names where the responsibility is durable. 4. Interview current operators and inspect real approvals, tickets, artifacts, and failure history. 5. Assign one accountable decision owner where possible, then responsible doers, contributors, consultees, and informed groups. 6. Check for orphan work, multiple unbounded owners, self-approval conflicts, overload, and missing backup coverage. 7. Resolve disagreements with the authorized leader and record exceptions or temporary assignments. 8. Link the matrix to workflows and role documents rather than treating it as a standalone truth. 9. Test a representative task and incident; revise any responsibility that remains ambiguous. ## Failure plan - Do not use the matrix to transfer accountability without authority or resources. - Never expose named performance concerns in a broadly shared role artifact. - If segregation of duties is required, do not merge request, approval, execution, and review silently. - Keep temporary vacancy coverage dated and owned. ## Done - Material decisions and deliverables have clear authority and execution ownership - Gaps, collisions, controls, backups, and exceptions are recorded - A representative workflow and failure path pass the responsibility test
GitHubで見る