ワンクリックで
review-workflow-guidance
Guide agents to choose a review pass intentionally and keep findings structured.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Guide agents to choose a review pass intentionally and keep findings structured.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Watch an open GitHub pull request for CI, mergeability, bot reviews, and human feedback until it is ready, closed, or blocked.
Harness-portable autonomous delivery loop for a scoped software task: front-load uncertainty, produce or confirm a plan, implement with TDD and validation, run review passes, prepare git/GitHub artifacts, and babysit the PR when authorized. Use when the user wants a mostly hands-off problem-to-PR workflow.
Use for commit, push, pull request, issue, and GitHub CLI workflows; emphasizes diff-grounded text and safe non-interactive commands.
Harness-portable planning and requirements-capture workflow for turning vague, risky, architectural, multi-workstream, or scope-drift-prone requests into durable artifacts before implementation. Use when the user asks to scope, plan, workshop, write a spec, capture acceptance criteria, prepare an implementation handoff, or when product intent should not be guessed.
Read-only reviewer for checking whether an implementation milestone matches an approved plan or spec.
Use when starting feature work that should be isolated from the main checkout; creates or verifies an isolated git worktree with safety checks.
| name | review-workflow-guidance |
| description | Guide agents to choose a review pass intentionally and keep findings structured. |
Use this when a task needs a post-implementation review pass.
::code-comment findings as typed review output, not
decorative markdown.Findings first, then questions/assumptions, then a short summary. If no issues are found, say so and name any residual test gaps.