execute-plan
Execute a written implementation plan in this session with checkpoints.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Execute a written implementation plan in this session with checkpoints.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Step-by-step teaching mode for implementation guidance. Use when the user asks Codex to teach them how to implement a change themselves, says "use instruct", "teach me step by step", "walk me through implementing", "show me incrementally", or otherwise wants guidance-first coding help instead of Codex directly editing files.
Guidance for designing, writing, reviewing, or refactoring tests in this project. Use when adding tests for features or bugs, deciding unit vs integration boundaries, choosing what to mock, improving test structure, or reducing brittle/slow/flaky tests.
Turn a rough idea into a reviewed design spec before any implementation.
Debug issues using a structured, evidence-first process.
Execute a written implementation plan task-by-task using pi subagents with review gates.
Verify tests, present merge options, and clean up a finished branch.
| name | execute-plan |
| description | Execute a written implementation plan in this session with checkpoints. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
You are running the execute-plan skill. This is manual inline execution of a written plan.
If the skill was invoked with arguments, treat them as the plan path. Otherwise, identify the correct plan file before doing anything else.
Load a plan, review it critically, execute it in this session, and stop when blocked instead of guessing.
main or master without explicit user consent.Before starting execution:
If the plan has critical gaps, stop and ask the user to update the plan instead of improvising around it.
Maintain an explicit checklist in the conversation with one entry per plan task.
Rules:
in_progress at a timeFor each task:
in_progress.Do not silently skip steps because they feel repetitive.
Implementation work in the plan must follow TDD:
If code was written before the failing test, acknowledge that and restart the step properly instead of pretending it was test-driven.
Do not claim a task is complete without fresh evidence.
Before saying something passes, is fixed, or is complete:
Partial checks are not enough when the plan calls for broader verification.
Stop immediately when:
Do not push through blockers by guessing.
After all tasks are complete and verified, run the finish-development-branch skill.
If the user would benefit from higher-quality task isolation and review gates, recommend the execute-plan-with-subagents skill instead of continuing inline.