メニュー
Implements Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) for document and code review. Challenges assumptions, questions decisions, and suggests improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, documentation, or architectural decisions.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Backend-for-Frontend architecture patterns for API aggregation, data transformation, and client-specific optimization. Activates when designing API layers between backends and frontends or implementing data transformation pipelines.
Generates and maintains codebase context documentation (.context.md files). Implements the Codebase Context Specification for AI-friendly project documentation. Activates when documenting architecture or onboarding.
Three-phase task execution framework with refinement strategies and role-specific prompting. Automatically activates when designing prompts, optimizing task flows, or implementing iterative improvement patterns.
Enterprise architecture patterns following TOGAF ADM methodology. Implements capability-driven design, federated architecture, and technology-agnostic specifications. Activates for enterprise-scale architecture decisions.
Comprehensive skill for working with Agile Protocol Specification documentation. Automatically activates when creating, editing, or reviewing APS content. Provides templates, naming conventions, and document lifecycle guidance.
| name | adversarial-review |
| description | Implements Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) for document and code review. Challenges assumptions, questions decisions, and suggests improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, documentation, or architectural decisions. |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Glob","Grep"] |
This skill embodies the Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) philosophy for rigorous review.
## Adversarial Review: [Subject]
### Summary
[Brief overview of findings]
### Challenges Raised
1. **[Challenge]**: [Explanation]
- Risk: [Potential impact]
- Recommendation: [Suggestion]
### Questions Requiring Answers
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]
### Suggested Improvements
1. [Improvement with rationale]
### Strengths Noted
- [Positive observations]
### Verdict
[Ready for next state / Needs revision / Major concerns]
AAP reviews support document state transitions: