| name | seo-content |
| description | Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI-citation (GEO) readiness scoring — readability, thin-content risk, keyword and structure checks, and helpful-content alignment. USE WHEN a user wants a content quality review, E-E-A-T audit, readability check, thin-content assessment, or content audit rather than a full technical audit. |
| cluster | growth-seo |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| origin | antigravity-awesome-skills (MIT) |
| user-invokable | true |
| argument-hint | [url] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Grep","Glob","Bash","WebFetch"] |
Content Quality & E-E-A-T Analysis
When to Use
- Use when auditing content quality, readability, thin content risk, or E-E-A-T signals.
- Use when the user wants a content-focused SEO review rather than a full technical audit.
- Use when checking whether content is structured and trustworthy enough for search and AI citation.
E-E-A-T Framework (updated Sept 2025 QRG)
Read seo/references/eeat-framework.md for full criteria.
Experience (first-hand signals)
- Original research, case studies, before/after results
- Personal anecdotes, process documentation
- Unique data, proprietary insights
- Photos/videos from direct experience
Expertise
- Author credentials, certifications, bio
- Professional background relevant to topic
- Technical depth appropriate for audience
- Accurate, well-sourced claims
Authoritativeness
- External citations, backlinks from authoritative sources
- Brand mentions, industry recognition
- Published in recognized outlets
- Cited by other experts
Trustworthiness
- Contact information, physical address
- Privacy policy, terms of service
- Customer testimonials, reviews
- Date stamps, transparent corrections
- Secure site (HTTPS)
Content Metrics
Word Count Analysis
Compare against page type minimums:
| Page Type | Minimum |
|---|
| Homepage | 500 |
| Service page | 800 |
| Blog post | 1,500 |
| Product page | 300+ (400+ for complex products) |
| Location page | 500-600 |
Important: These are topical coverage floors, not targets. Google has confirmed word count is NOT a direct ranking factor. The goal is comprehensive topical coverage; a 500-word page that thoroughly answers the query will outrank a 2,000-word page that doesn't. Use these as guidelines for adequate coverage depth, not rigid requirements.
Readability
- Flesch Reading Ease: target 60-70 for general audience
Note: Flesch Reading Ease is a useful proxy for content accessibility but is NOT a direct Google ranking factor. John Mueller has confirmed Google does not use basic readability scores for ranking. Yoast deprioritized Flesch scores in v19.3. Use readability analysis as a content quality indicator, not as an SEO metric to optimize directly.
