technical-roadmap-planning

name	technical-roadmap-planning
description	Gathers inputs, defines initiatives, prioritises with an impact/effort matrix, sequences dependencies, and produces a roadmap table. Invoked when the user asks to plan a technical roadmap, prioritise engineering initiatives, or create a quarter/half-year engineering plan.
version	1.0.0
tags	["planning","roadmap","strategy","backend"]
resources	[]
vendor_support	{"claude":"native","opencode":"native","copilot":"prompt-inject","codex":"prompt-inject","gemini":"prompt-inject"}

Technical Roadmap Planning Skill

Step 1 — Gather Inputs

Before defining initiatives, collect:

• Business objectives for the period (OKRs, product strategy, growth targets).
• Tech debt inventory — known architectural problems, reliability gaps, security risks.
• Reliability data — incident history, SLA breaches, on-call burden.
• Team capacity — headcount, planned leave, hiring timeline.
• Dependencies — migrations, third-party deprecations, compliance deadlines.

Ask the user to provide or confirm these inputs before proceeding.

Step 2 — Define Initiatives

For each initiative, capture:

Initiative: <name>
Problem:    <what is broken or missing — one sentence>
Metric:     <how success is measured — must be quantifiable>
Effort:     <S | M | L | XL>  (S=days, M=weeks, L=1-2 months, XL=quarter+)
Impact:     <Low | Medium | High | Critical>
Dependencies: <other initiatives or teams this blocks or is blocked by>

Example:

Initiative: Database connection pooling
Problem:    Under peak load, the API exhausts the DB connection limit, causing 503s.
Metric:     Zero connection-limit errors in staging load test at 2× current peak traffic.
Effort:     S
Impact:     High
Dependencies: None

Step 3 — Prioritise (Impact / Effort Matrix)

Plot each initiative on a 2×2 grid and apply the priority rules:

Impact
  High │ Quick Wins ★ │ Strategic Bets ◆
       │ (do now)     │ (plan carefully)
       ├──────────────┼──────────────────
  Low  │ Fill-ins     │ Avoid / defer
       │ (if capacity)│
       └──────────────┴────────────────
          Low Effort      High Effort

Priority	Quadrant	Action
1	High Impact + Low Effort	Schedule immediately
2	High Impact + High Effort	Plan with milestones
3	Low Impact + Low Effort	Fill between larger items
4	Low Impact + High Effort	Defer or remove

Mark compliance/security items as non-negotiable regardless of quadrant.

Step 4 — Sequence

Apply dependency ordering:

• Initiatives with no dependencies come first.
• Identify the critical path: the longest chain of dependent initiatives.
• Avoid starting more than 2 large initiatives in parallel (context switching cost).

Step 5 — Milestone Definition

Break each Large or XL initiative into milestones with binary (done/not-done) completion criteria:

Initiative: Event-driven order processing
Milestone 1: Outbox pattern implemented and tested in staging        — Week 2
Milestone 2: Consumer deployed; order events flowing in staging       — Week 4
Milestone 3: Production rollout complete; legacy sync path removed    — Week 6

Step 6 — Output: Roadmap Table

Produce the roadmap in this format:

## Technical Roadmap — Q2 2025

| # | Initiative | Impact | Effort | Owner | Target | Status |
|---|-----------|--------|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| 1 | DB connection pooling | High | S | Platform | Week 1 | Planned |
| 2 | Event-driven orders | High | L | Backend | Week 6 | Planned |
| 3 | Remove legacy auth | Medium | M | Backend | Week 4 | Planned |
| 4 | Upgrade Go 1.26 | Low | S | Platform | Week 2 | Planned |

### Dependencies
- Item 3 (Remove legacy auth) is blocked by item X (New auth rollout, owned by product).

### Risks
- Item 2 requires DB schema changes; coordinate with DBA team.

### Out of Scope This Quarter
- GraphQL federation migration (deferred to Q3 — too high effort)