research
Deep research with parallel sub-agents, query classification, and filesystem artifact passing
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Deep research with parallel sub-agents, query classification, and filesystem artifact passing
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | research |
| description | Deep research with parallel sub-agents, query classification, and filesystem artifact passing |
| allowed-tools | Task, Read, Write, Bash(git log:*), Bash(git diff:*), WebSearch, WebFetch, Glob, Grep |
| argument-hint | <question or topic to investigate> |
Conduct deep, parallel research on a topic using multiple specialized sub-agents.
$ARGUMENTS
This is the critical first step. Classify before doing anything else.
| Type | Characteristics | Sub-agents | Depth per agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breadth-first | Multiple independent aspects, surveys, comparisons | 5-10 | 5-10 searches each |
| Depth-first | Single topic requiring thorough understanding, technical deep-dives | 2-4 | 10-15 searches each |
| Simple factual | Single fact, specific data point, quick lookup | 1-2 | 3-5 searches each |
After reading the query, determine:
Spawn all sub-agents in a single message for true parallelization using the Task tool.
Each Task prompt MUST begin with a depth-mode trigger phrase:
| Mode | Trigger prefix | Expected effort |
|---|---|---|
| Quick verification | "Quick check:", "Verify:", "Confirm:" | 3-5 searches |
| Focused investigation | "Investigate:", "Explore:", "Find details about:" | 5-10 searches |
| Deep research | "Deep dive:", "Comprehensive:", "Thorough research:" | 10-15 searches |
Each sub-agent MUST:
/tmp/research_[timestamp]_[topic_slug].mdThis reduces token usage by ~90% compared to passing full reports inline.
Breadth-first — "Compare Tauri vs Electron vs Neutralino for desktop apps":
Task 1: "Investigate: Tauri's architecture, performance characteristics, and ecosystem maturity"
Task 2: "Investigate: Electron's architecture, performance characteristics, and ecosystem maturity"
Task 3: "Investigate: Neutralino's architecture, performance characteristics, and ecosystem maturity"
Task 4: "Explore: Performance benchmarks comparing Tauri, Electron, and Neutralino"
Task 5: "Investigate: Developer experience, tooling, and community size for each framework"
Task 6: "Quick check: Latest release dates and roadmap status for each framework"
Depth-first — "How does the spec compiler validation pipeline work?":
Task 1: "Deep dive: Trace the spec compiler entry point through all validation phases (codebase research using Grep/Read)"
Task 2: "Comprehensive: Map all error codes and validation rules in the spec compiler"
Task 3: "Thorough research: Document the data flow and intermediate representations used during compilation"
Simple factual — "What license does this project use?":
Task 1: "Quick check: Find the LICENSE file and any license declarations in package manifests"
After all sub-agents complete:
/tmp/research_*.md paths from sub-agent responses/tmp/research_final_[timestamp].md# Research Report: [Query Topic]
## Executive Summary
[3-5 paragraph overview synthesizing all findings]
## Key Findings
1. **[Finding 1]** — synthesized from multiple sub-agent reports
2. **[Finding 2]** — cross-referenced and verified
3. **[Finding 3]** — with supporting evidence
## Detailed Analysis
### [Theme 1]
[Comprehensive synthesis from all relevant sub-agent findings]
### [Theme 2]
[Comprehensive synthesis from all relevant sub-agent findings]
## Sources & References
[Consolidated list organized by type: codebase files, documentation, web sources]
## Research Metadata
- Query classification: [breadth / depth / simple]
- Sub-agents deployed: [count and focus areas]
- Total sources analyzed: [count]
- Research artifacts: [list of /tmp/research_*.md files]
Now classify the query and launch parallel research sub-agents.
Run the local fast CI loop (`make ci`) and automatically fix discovered issues using concurrent agents
One-time contributor setup — run `make setup` and verify governed reads work end-to-end so `/init` can report lifecycle and structural counts.
Run dead code and duplicate detection, get categorized cleanup recommendations
Create a git commit with an impact-focused conventional commit message
Staged adversarial review — triage, decorrelated finders (warm + cold), per-finding refuters, evidence-ready report
Post-create PR lifecycle automation — rerun infra failures, triage review comments adversarially, enqueue when green, verify merged main. Designed for /loop.