ワンクリックで
discuss
Discuss and explore ideas before committing to an approach
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Discuss and explore ideas before committing to an approach
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Autonomous product factory — /make-a-goal in godmode. Point it at a north-star outcome and it runs the whole delivery machine unattended: brainstorm the feature landscape (Discover), put every idea through a Feasibility Court, cluster into a Roadmap of epics, then per epic Plan → adversarial review → Execute (model-paired build) → VERIFY (drive the real UI/TUI/API, not mocks) → ship a stacked PR, looping until the backlog is dry or a budget/time bound fires. One human gate (roadmap blessing), hard stop rules, always-on tabbed RAG dashboard, crash-proof resume from state files. Use when the user says 'godmode', 'run the factory', 'ship X to nirvana', 'execute this whole backlog autonomously', 'goals within goals', or wants a multi-epic programme driven end-to-end with real end-to-end verification. NOT for single features, one-off verification, or scoped builds — use /make-a-goal, browser/tmux verification skills, or a plain plan for those.
Sync user-level agent config changes back to the ainb-toolkit repo (works for Claude, Codex, Copilot)
Produce a self-contained, richly styled HTML explainer for any topic the user asks about. Picks the right template from a bundled set of 22 visual patterns (feature explainer, concept explainer, module map, PR review, ADR, options paper / trade-off analysis, system diagram, flow- chart, status report, slide deck, prototype, editor, etc.), fills it with real content, augments with inline diagrams via sister skills (/fireworks-tech-graph for architecture / flow / sequence diagrams, /graphify for knowledge graphs), applies a Claude-brand polish layer, and publishes it: by default onto the configured here.now custom domain (path mount + searchable categorised index + password lock per the config's protect rule, driven by ~/.herenow/explainers.json), or a plain here.now URL, or a GitHub gist (--gist / --gist --public). Local-only output is available with --local. Use when Stevie says "/explain-to-me", "explain-to-me X", "make me an explainer for X", "give me an HTML explainer", "render this as a webpage", "ADR for
Self-improvement through conversation analysis. Extracts learnings from corrections and success patterns, permanently encoding them into agent definitions. Philosophy - Correct once, never again.
Claude Code observability skill: analyze session traces stored in Langfuse, extract learnings from corrections, identify success patterns, and propose agent/skill improvements based on historical data. Powers self-improvement through trace analysis of Claude Code sessions.
Create well-formatted git commits for changes made during the session
| name | discuss |
| description | Discuss and explore ideas before committing to an approach |
| user-invocable | true |
Capture implementation decisions BEFORE planning. Produces a CONTEXT.md with locked decisions that /plan must honor.
/plan when the phase has ambiguities.planning/ROADMAP.md.planning/ROADMAP.md to identify the target phase.planning/STATE.md for current positionBased on what the phase is building, identify 3-4 ambiguities:
| Domain | Typical Gray Areas |
|---|---|
| UI/Frontend | Layout approach, interaction patterns, responsive behavior, state management |
| API/Backend | Response formats, error handling, auth strategy, data validation |
| Data/Storage | Schema design, migration approach, indexing strategy |
| Infrastructure | Deployment target, scaling approach, monitoring |
Present them:
Phase [N]: [Name]
I've identified these areas that need decisions before planning:
1. **[Area 1]**: [Why this is ambiguous]
2. **[Area 2]**: [Why this is ambiguous]
3. **[Area 3]**: [Why this is ambiguous]
Which areas would you like to discuss? (or "all")
For each selected area, ask 3-4 probing questions using AskUserQuestion:
Write to .planning/phases/{phase}/CONTEXT.md:
# Phase [N] Context: [Phase Name]
## Scope (from Roadmap)
[Copy from ROADMAP.md]
## Implementation Decisions
### [Area 1]
- **Decision**: [Concrete choice]
- **Rationale**: [Why this choice]
- **Trade-off**: [What we're giving up]
### [Area 2]
...
## Deferred Ideas
- [Idea mentioned but deferred to later phase]
---
*Locked on [date]. /plan must honor these decisions.*
Update .planning/STATE.md to record that discussion is complete for this phase.
If no .planning/ directory exists, /discuss still works:
plans/discuss_[topic]_[date].md instead