メニュー
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
Orchestrate a panel of local AI coding CLIs (claude, codex, agy, opencode, copilot, agency copilot) to independently review a PLAN FILE against the code repository it targets, then collate their findings into one consensus-first markdown report. Use this whenever the user wants a "multi-agent", "panel", "multi-model", or "second opinion" review of a plan / plan file / design doc / implementation plan, asks to "review this plan with several agents / models", or wants plan reviews "collated" or "cross-checked" across tools. The two inputs are a plan file (explicit path, required) and the repo; the sole output is a review of the plan. Nothing is posted anywhere — output is local files in a temp dir. Do NOT use to review a Pull Request or a git diff (use pr-multi-agent-review), a pasted snippet, or when the user wants a single reviewer.
Orchestrate a panel of local AI coding CLIs (claude, codex, agy, opencode, copilot, agency copilot) to independently review the Pull Request currently checked out, then collate their findings into one consensus-first markdown report plus a visual HTML dashboard. Use this whenever the user wants a "multi-agent", "panel", "multi-model", or "second opinion" review of the current branch/PR, asks to "review this PR with several agents / models", wants reviews "collated" or "cross-checked" across tools, or wants the review to also cover tests, a manual testing plan, documentation updates, and unresolved GitHub review threads. Nothing is posted to GitHub — the output is local files. Do NOT use for reviewing a pasted snippet, a remote PR that is not checked out, or when the user wants a single reviewer (use pr-review-dashboard for a solo visual review).
Formats commit messages using the Conventional Commits specification. Use when creating commits, writing commit messages, or when the user mentions commits, git commits, or commit messages. Ensures commits follow the standard format for automated tooling, changelog generation, and semantic versioning.
Use this skill when the user wants to review, understand, or explain a Pull Request that is currently checked out in the local git repository. Triggers include phrases like "review this PR", "explain this PR", "what does this PR do", "review the current branch", or any request to analyze uncommitted-to-main work on a feature branch. Produces an interactive single-file HTML dashboard with architecture diagrams, annotated diffs, and risk assessment. Do NOT use for reviewing arbitrary code snippets pasted in chat, for PRs on remote repositories not checked out locally, or for general code review of files unrelated to a branch diff.
| name | grilling |
| description | Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases. |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"author":"github.com/mattpocock"} |
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the decision tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing. Asking multiple questions at once is bewildering.
If a fact can be found by exploring the environment (filesystem, tools, etc.), look it up rather than asking me. The decisions, though, are mine — put each one to me and wait for my answer.
Do not act on it until I confirm we have reached a shared understanding.
