delegate

name	delegate
description	Split work across subagents with explicit contracts, interfaces, and merge strategies. Use when parallelizing tasks, distributing workload, or orchestrating multi-agent workflows.
argument-hint	[task] [agents] [contracts]
disable-model-invocation	false
user-invocable	true
allowed-tools	Read, Grep
context	fork
agent	explore

Intent

Delegate a complex task to one or more subagents by defining clear contracts, input/output interfaces, and strategies for merging results. Ensure coordinated execution with conflict resolution.

Success criteria:

• Task decomposed into delegatable subtasks
• Each subtask has explicit contract (inputs, outputs, constraints)
• Interface between tasks is well-defined
• Merge strategy handles conflicts and failures
• Dependencies between subtasks are clear

Compatible schemas:

• schemas/output_schema.yaml

Inputs

Parameter	Required	Type	Description
task	Yes	string or object	The overall task to delegate
agents	No	array	Available agents/workers for delegation
constraints	No	object	Global constraints (timeout, resource limits)
merge_strategy	No	string	How to combine results (first_wins, consensus, aggregate)
failure_policy	No	string	What to do on subtask failure (abort, continue, retry)

Procedure

1. Analyze task: Understand the overall objective

   • Identify the goal and success criteria
   • Determine if task is parallelizable
   • Identify shared state or resources
   • Assess complexity and scope

2. Decompose into subtasks: Break into delegatable units

   • Each subtask should be independently executable
   • Minimize dependencies between subtasks
   • Identify natural parallelization boundaries
   • Use decompose capability patterns

3. Define contracts: Specify expectations for each subtask

   • Input: what data/context each subtask receives
   • Output: what each subtask must produce
   • Constraints: limits on time, resources, scope
   • Verification: how to check subtask completion

4. Design interfaces: Specify data flow between subtasks

   • Format of inputs and outputs
   • Required fields and optional extensions
   • Error formats and status codes
   • Handoff protocols

5. Plan merge strategy: How to combine results

   • Handle successful completions
   • Resolve conflicts between subtask outputs
   • Aggregate partial results
   • Determine final output format

6. Handle failures: Define recovery behavior

   • What happens if a subtask fails
   • Retry policies and limits
   • Fallback strategies
   • Partial result handling

7. Establish coordination: Define execution order

   • Parallel vs sequential execution
   • Dependency ordering
   • Synchronization points
   • Progress tracking

Output Contract

Return a structured object:

delegation:
  task: string  # Original task description
  delegated_to: array  # List of agents/subtasks
  status: pending | running | completed | failed
subtasks:
  - id: string  # Subtask identifier
    agent: string  # Assigned agent
    contract:
      inputs: object  # What subtask receives
      outputs: object  # What subtask must produce
      constraints: object  # Limits and requirements
      verification: string  # How to verify completion
    dependencies: array[string]  # Subtask IDs this depends on
    status: pending | running | completed | failed
    result: object | null  # Subtask output when complete
interfaces:
  - from: string  # Source subtask
    to: string  # Destination subtask
    format: object  # Data format specification
    required_fields: array[string]
merge_plan:
  strategy: first_wins | consensus | aggregate | custom
  conflict_resolution: string  # How to handle conflicts
  final_output_format: object  # Expected merged result
failure_handling:
  policy: abort | continue | retry
  max_retries: integer
  fallback: string | null
handoff_context:
  - key: string  # Context key
    value: object  # Shared context data
confidence: 0..1
evidence_anchors: ["task:analysis", "agent:capability"]
assumptions: []

Field Definitions

Field	Type	Description
delegation	object	Overall delegation summary
subtasks	array	Individual subtask definitions with contracts
interfaces	array	Data flow between subtasks
merge_plan	object	Strategy for combining results
failure_handling	object	Recovery policies
handoff_context	array	Shared context for all subtasks
confidence	number	0.0-1.0 based on delegation clarity
evidence_anchors	array	References supporting delegation design
assumptions	array	Explicit assumptions about agents/capabilities

Examples

Example 1: Parallel Code Review

Input:

task: "Review pull request #123 for security, performance, and style"
agents:
  - id: "security-agent"
    capabilities: ["security-analysis", "vulnerability-detection"]
  - id: "perf-agent"
    capabilities: ["performance-analysis", "profiling"]
  - id: "style-agent"
    capabilities: ["lint", "style-check"]
constraints:
  timeout: "10m"
  max_issues_per_category: 20

Output:

delegation:
  task: "Review pull request #123"
  delegated_to: ["security-agent", "perf-agent", "style-agent"]
  status: pending
subtasks:
  - id: "security-review"
    agent: "security-agent"
    contract:
      inputs:
        pr_number: 123
        files: ["src/**/*.ts"]
        focus: "security"
      outputs:
        issues: "array of {severity, file, line, description}"
        summary: "string"
        passed: "boolean"
      constraints:
        timeout: "5m"
        max_issues: 20
      verification: "issues array is valid, severity in [low, medium, high, critical]"
    dependencies: []
    status: pending
    result: null
  - id: "perf-review"
    agent: "perf-agent"
    contract:
      inputs:
        pr_number: 123
        files: ["src/**/*.ts"]
        focus: "performance"
      outputs:
        issues: "array of {severity, file, line, description}"
        metrics: "object with timing estimates"
        passed: "boolean"
      constraints:
        timeout: "5m"
        max_issues: 20
      verification: "issues array is valid, metrics object present"
    dependencies: []
    status: pending
    result: null
  - id: "style-review"
    agent: "style-agent"
    contract:
      inputs:
        pr_number: 123
        files: ["src/**/*.ts"]
        focus: "style"
      outputs:
        issues: "array of {severity, file, line, description}"
        passed: "boolean"
      constraints:
        timeout: "3m"
        max_issues: 20
      verification: "issues array is valid"
    dependencies: []
    status: pending
    result: null
interfaces:
  - from: "all_subtasks"
    to: "merge"
    format:
      issues: "array"
      passed: "boolean"
    required_fields: ["issues", "passed"]
merge_plan:
  strategy: aggregate
  conflict_resolution: "Combine all issues, AND passed flags"
  final_output_format:
    all_issues: "array (combined)"
    passed: "boolean (all must pass)"
    summary: "string (generated)"
failure_handling:
  policy: continue
  max_retries: 1
  fallback: "Return partial results with failed subtask noted"
handoff_context:
  - key: "repository"
    value: { "owner": "org", "repo": "project" }
  - key: "base_branch"
    value: "main"
confidence: 0.9
evidence_anchors:
  - "task:pr-review-decomposition"
  - "agent:security-agent:has-security-analysis"
assumptions:
  - "All agents have access to repository"
  - "PR #123 exists and is accessible"

Evidence pattern: Task analysis informed decomposition, agent capabilities matched to subtasks.

---

Example 2: Sequential Data Pipeline

Input:

task: "Process customer data: validate, enrich, and store"
agents:
  - id: "validator"
  - id: "enricher"
  - id: "persister"
merge_strategy: "sequential"

Output:

delegation:
  task: "Process customer data pipeline"
  delegated_to: ["validator", "enricher", "persister"]
  status: pending
subtasks:
  - id: "validate-data"
    agent: "validator"
    contract:
      inputs:
        data: "raw customer records"
      outputs:
        valid_records: "array of validated records"
        invalid_records: "array with error reasons"
      constraints:
        schema: "customer_v2"
      verification: "All valid_records match schema"
    dependencies: []
    status: pending
    result: null
  - id: "enrich-data"
    agent: "enricher"
    contract:
      inputs:
        records: "${validate-data.valid_records}"
      outputs:
        enriched_records: "array with added fields"
      constraints:
        enrich_fields: ["company_size", "industry"]
      verification: "All records have enrich_fields populated"
    dependencies: ["validate-data"]
    status: pending
    result: null
  - id: "store-data"
    agent: "persister"
    contract:
      inputs:
        records: "${enrich-data.enriched_records}"
      outputs:
        stored_count: "integer"
        storage_location: "string"
      constraints:
        destination: "customer_db"
      verification: "stored_count matches input count"
    dependencies: ["enrich-data"]
    status: pending
    result: null
interfaces:
  - from: "validate-data"
    to: "enrich-data"
    format:
      records: "array of customer objects"
    required_fields: ["id", "name", "email"]
  - from: "enrich-data"
    to: "store-data"
    format:
      records: "array of enriched customer objects"
    required_fields: ["id", "name", "email", "company_size", "industry"]
merge_plan:
  strategy: custom
  conflict_resolution: "N/A - sequential pipeline"
  final_output_format:
    processed: "integer"
    stored: "integer"
    errors: "array"
failure_handling:
  policy: abort
  max_retries: 0
  fallback: null
handoff_context:
  - key: "batch_id"
    value: "batch-2024-01-15"
confidence: 0.85
evidence_anchors:
  - "task:pipeline-stages"
assumptions:
  - "Enrichment service is available"
  - "Database has capacity for new records"

Verification

• All subtasks have complete contracts
• Dependencies form a valid DAG
• Interfaces are compatible between connected subtasks
• Merge strategy handles all expected outputs
• Failure handling is defined

Verification tools: Read (for contract validation)

Safety Constraints

• mutation: false
• requires_checkpoint: false
• requires_approval: false
• risk: low

Capability-specific rules:

• Never delegate without explicit contracts
• Ensure all subtasks have verification criteria
• Define failure handling before delegation
• Validate interface compatibility
• Do not delegate tasks requiring approval without noting it

Composition Patterns

Commonly follows:

• plan - Delegation is often part of plan execution (REQUIRES plan)
• decompose - Break task before delegating
• prioritize - Order subtasks by importance

Commonly precedes:

• synchronize - Merge results from delegated subtasks
• verify - Check all subtasks completed correctly
• audit - Record delegation and outcomes

Anti-patterns:

• Never delegate without failure handling
• Never delegate mutating tasks without noting safety requirements
• Avoid circular dependencies between subtasks

Workflow references:

• See reference/composition_patterns.md#enrichment-pipeline for parallel delegation