git-review

name	git-review
description	Review uncommitted changes for issues, missed items, and improvements. Use after finishing a substantial change, before committing, or when the user asks to check the work.
argument-hint	["range"]
allowed-tools	Bash(git *), Read, Glob, Grep
context	fork

Review the git diff and identify:

1. Missed items: Incomplete implementations, forgotten edge cases, TODOs
2. Issues: Bugs, security concerns, inconsistencies with existing patterns
3. Improvements: Clarity, performance, maintainability
4. Cleanup: Debug code, commented-out code, unnecessary changes

Changes

!git status --short

!git diff --no-ext-diff $ARGUMENTS

!git diff --cached --no-ext-diff

Provide a concise, actionable summary. If everything looks good, say so briefly.

Instructions

Before flagging an issue, read the relevant surrounding code to verify it's actually a problem. Specifically:

• If a change removes dedup/caching logic, check whether the receiver already handles duplicates before calling it out.
• If a change uses a variable or prop not shown in the diff, read the file to understand its type, source, and nullability before speculating.
• If a change modifies a condition or filter, check the call sites and data flow to confirm whether the new behavior is correct.
• If something looks like it could break, check for guards, fallbacks, or reconciliation logic elsewhere before reporting.
• Untracked new files (?? in the status above) are in neither diff; read them in full and review them like any other change. A whole new file escaping review is the most likely gap.

Do not flag something as an issue if the existing codebase already handles it. Only report confirmed or highly likely problems.

Handoff

Split the findings: a fix is mechanical and unambiguous (leftover debug code, a confirmed bug with an obvious correction, a missed rename, dead code) - include the exact change to make; a decision involves intent or a tradeoff (behavior changes, design questions, scope concerns).

End the report by telling the assistant that invoked you to apply the fixes immediately, without waiting for confirmation, and to surface the decisions to the user as questions. If there are no findings, say everything looks good and that nothing needs to happen.