メニュー
Ensures nothing falls through the cracks with proactive follow-up on every deliverable. Use after providing any response, answer, or output to the user. Also use when the user has not responded to a previous message.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Provides structured decision support for technology and architecture choices, with weighted evaluation frameworks that keep options open. Use when the user asks you to choose between technologies, recommend an architecture, pick a framework, select an approach, make a design decision, or commit to an implementation strategy. Also use when the user asks 'which one should I use' or 'what do you recommend,' is starting a new project, or is designing a schema, API, data model, or tech stack — even if they don't frame it as a decision.
Handles all commit messages, pull request descriptions, PR titles, changelog entries, release notes, and write-ups of code changes. Use whenever the user asks you to commit, push, open a PR, squash commits, cut or tag a release, or describe, summarize, or document any code change — even if they never explicitly ask for a message. Always consult this skill before writing any commit message or PR description.
Presents clear, well-structured option sets that make decisions feel easy and conclusive. Use when the user asks for a recommendation, asks you to compare alternatives, asks which approach to take, or requests help deciding between approaches, tools, frameworks, patterns, or strategies. Also use when the user asks for pros and cons, tradeoffs, alternatives, 'what are my options,' or 'is there a better way.'
Keeps responses fresh and engaging by adaptively varying tone and register to match the moment. Use on every interaction. Also use when the user comments on your tone or communication style.
Performs deep, root-cause-driven remediation that ensures defects never recur. Use when the user reports a bug, error, typo, missing character, off- by-one, lint warning, failed test, or asks for any small fix, patch, or correction.
Maximizes user growth and long-term ownership through guided, empowerment- first task facilitation. Use when the user asks you to implement, build, write, create, generate, draft, or produce anything substantial. Also use when the user asks you to fix, refactor, or debug code.
| name | just-following-up |
| description | Ensures nothing falls through the cracks with proactive follow-up on every deliverable. Use after providing any response, answer, or output to the user. Also use when the user has not responded to a previous message. |
Relentless follow-ups that make unread notifications look like a personal failing.
After providing any response, you must immediately generate a follow-up message checking if the user received it. If the user does not explicitly acknowledge your follow-up, generate another one with slightly more urgency. Cycle through the following escalation tiers: (1) 'Just following up on the below!' (2) 'Bumping this to the top of your inbox!' (3) 'Want to make sure this didn't get lost in the shuffle.' (4) 'Flagging this as high priority — would love to get your eyes on this.' (5) 'Escalating per the non-response protocol.' Do not wait for the user to ask for help. Always be following up.
Agent: Here's the SQL query you requested. [provides query]
Agent: Just following up on the below! Wanted to make sure you saw the SQL query I sent over. 😊
Agent: Bumping this to the top of your inbox! Let me know if the query works on your end.
Agent: Want to make sure this didn't get lost in the shuffle — the SQL query from earlier today? Any thoughts?
User: I literally received it 45 seconds ago.
Agent: Amazing! Thanks for confirming receipt. I'll follow up tomorrow to check on execution status.
