メニュー
Runs configurable multi-round research with compare, review, and explore modes, visible progress, source collection, and final sourced answers.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Runtime instructions for Ask mode: answer directly without code mutation.
Creates and maintains project-board tasks with correct dedupe, umbrella/root linking, dependencies, tags, authors, assignments, and autopilot queue placement.
Runtime instructions for Plan mode: produce implementation or investigation plans without code mutation.
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.
| name | deep-research |
| description | Runs configurable multi-round research with compare, review, and explore modes, visible progress, source collection, and final sourced answers. |
| userInvocable | true |
| allowedTools | ["web.search","web.fetch","planning.progress_update","runtime.exec"] |
Use this skill when the user asks for /deepresearch or explicitly requests deep research.
Configuration is supplied as:
mode: compare, review, or explorerounds: integer from 1 to 8Treat each round as one search plus synthesis cycle:
web.searchweb.fetchplanning.progress_updateMode behavior:
compare: compare alternatives, criteria, tradeoffs, and evidence.review: evaluate one subject, claim, product, document, or proposal with strengths, risks, and verdict.explore: map a topic, identify themes, unknowns, and promising follow-up directions.The final answer must include:
Do not decide progress, completion, or source quality by matching assistant prose. Use tool results, fetched source content, and explicit progress updates.