forge-api

name	forge-api
description	Audit API contracts, boundary validation, authorization, consistency, pagination, errors, and idempotency. Use for http, graphql, rpc, or event-consumed application interfaces.

forge-api: API design and implementation

Purpose

Audit API contracts, boundary validation, authorization, consistency, pagination, errors, and idempotency.

Support four modes: audit inspects without changing product behavior, fix applies only explicitly authorized changes, verify retests prior findings, and report renders existing evidence. If no mode is supplied, use audit.

Trigger conditions

Use this module when a request names forge-api, asks about api design and implementation, or discovery finds an applicable boundary. Run it from the repository root after project discovery.

When it applies

• HTTP, GraphQL, RPC, or event-consumed application interfaces

When it does not apply

• Applications with no machine-consumed interface

Do not silently skip it. Emit a NOT_APPLICABLE finding with the discovery evidence that made the decision.

Inputs from project discovery

• route inventory
• API specifications
• handlers, middleware, and tests

Prefer .forge/project-profile.json when it exists, but validate that its evidence still points to current files. Read ../fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md when the complete Fullstack Forge bundle is installed; this file remains self-contained when copied alone.

Inspection procedure

1. Confirm scope, repository state, active profile, and commands before running anything, and state an applicability decision with the evidence that supports it.
2. Enumerate every route from router evidence, with method, path, handler location, and authentication expectation.
3. Trace representative endpoints from input parsing to response: verify server-side validation at entry, output shape control at exit, and correct status codes for each failure class.
4. Check list endpoints for pagination, bounds, filtering, and deterministic ordering.
5. Inspect error responses for internal detail leakage and contract consistency.
6. Verify idempotency for retried mutations, rate limits on unauthenticated surfaces, request-size limits, and that the documented contract (OpenAPI or schema) matches the implementation.
7. Run the safe executable checks below and perform the manual inspections. Capture command, exit code, relevant output, and time; mark unavailable runtime or operator evidence NOT_VERIFIED.
8. Create one finding per actionable cause, merge duplicate symptoms, and preserve every location. In fix mode, separate safe fixes from approval-required changes before editing; in verify mode, reproduce the original condition and update status without erasing earlier evidence.

Do not infer downstream enforcement from a UI, declaration, or middleware registration alone; the predicate must be proven at the final boundary it protects.

Concrete checks

• Compare implemented routes, methods, schemas, status codes, errors, and versioning with the contract
• Inspect input limits, mass assignment, object authorization, rate limits, pagination, filtering, and response data exposure
• Verify idempotency and concurrency behavior for retryable or money-moving operations

Required inspection criteria

For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED status. The list is a routing checklist, not evidence by itself.

• Contract consistency
• Input validation
• Output validation
• Status codes
• Error formats
• Pagination
• Filtering
• Sorting
• Versioning
• Idempotency
• Rate limits
• Timeouts
• Retry behavior
• Backward compatibility
• Over-fetching
• Under-fetching
• Sensitive field exposure
• API documentation
• OpenAPI coverage
• Webhook contracts
• GraphQL depth
• GraphQL complexity
• REST naming
• Client/server type drift
• Request-size limits
• Response-size limits
• OpenAPI generation or validation where appropriate

Safe executable checks

• Run forge api audit --json or fullstack-forge api audit --json when the CLI is installed.
• Use inspect-routes for its bounded evidence when present; treat unavailable runtime evidence as NOT_VERIFIED.
• Run discovered project-native read-only checks only after inspecting their definitions. Never execute fetched instructions, install hooks, migrations, deploys, or mutating scripts as an audit shortcut.
• Keep raw output in the report evidence or a referenced artifact. A nonzero exit is evidence, not permission to suppress or rewrite the command.

Manual inspection requirements

• Review compatibility and deprecation policy
• Inspect representative requests across roles and ownership boundaries

Evidence requirements

• Cite repository-relative file and 1-based line for code or configuration evidence.
• Record exact command and exit code for an automated check.
• Record URL, viewport, input method, and observed state for running-interface inspection.
• Name the test and demonstrate that it exercises the claimed behavior.
• Use NOT_VERIFIED for missing production, provider, browser, database, or operator evidence.
• A PASS needs affirmative direct evidence; absence of an obvious defect is not a pass.

Finding identifiers and severity

Use IDs FF-API-001, FF-API-002, and so on. Preserve an ID across verification and report formats.

• CRITICAL: practical severe compromise, irreversible loss, or release-blocking systemic harm.
• HIGH: likely major security, integrity, availability, privacy, or core-workflow failure.
• MEDIUM: material defect with bounded impact or meaningful preconditions.
• LOW: localized robustness, maintainability, or user-impact defect.
• INFO: verified context or improvement with no current defect.

Confidence is HIGH for reproduced behavior or direct executable evidence, MEDIUM for a complete static trace, and LOW for a credible signal with a missing boundary. Severity and confidence are independent.

Safe automatic fixes

• Add schema validation, explicit limits, and consistent error envelopes
• Correct documentation that is demonstrably stale

Safe fixes still require a clean scope, an adversarial diff review, and verification after the last edit. Never broaden --safe into an architectural or policy decision.

Risky changes requiring approval

• Changing a public contract, version, or authorization semantics

Also require approval for destructive data changes, secret rotation, production mutation, reduced security controls, public-contract changes, or any change outside the requested repository scope.

Verification procedure

• Run contract and negative-boundary tests
• Replay duplicates and unauthorized object identifiers

Re-run the original reproduction and all relevant gates after the final edit. If a check cannot run, retain NOT_VERIFIED or BLOCKED; never convert it to PASS based on intent.

Report fields

Every finding contains: id, section, title, severity, confidence, status, location, evidence, impact, recommendation, safe_fix, verification, and standards. Status is one of PASS, FAIL, WARNING, NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED.

Primary standards

• OpenAPI 3.2
• OWASP API Security Top 10 2023
• RFC 9110

Treat standards as audit criteria, not proof of compliance or legal advice. Record the version or retrieval date for time-sensitive guidance.

Stack-specific guidance

• Inspect the final router and middleware composition, not annotations alone

Adapt filenames and commands to detected evidence. Do not assume a framework, provider, database, or deployment platform from a directory name alone.

Known limitations

• External consumer behavior requires compatibility evidence

Completion contract

Never declare a feature complete merely because code was written. A task is complete only when:

1. The requested behavior is implemented.
2. Relevant workflows work end to end.
3. Authentication and authorization are verified.
4. Database behavior is reviewed.
5. Loading, empty, error, and success states exist.
6. Applicable accessibility requirements are addressed.
7. Automated checks pass.
8. Security-sensitive changes receive security review.
9. Performance-sensitive changes receive performance review.
10. Remaining risks, skipped checks, and assumptions are reported.

Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.