forge-notifications

name	forge-notifications
description	Inspect email, SMS, push, and in-app notifications for authorization, preferences, retries, privacy, and deliverability. Use for transactional, security, lifecycle, or marketing messages.

forge-notifications: Notifications

Purpose

Inspect email, SMS, push, and in-app notifications for authorization, preferences, retries, privacy, and deliverability.

Support four modes: audit inspects without changing product behavior, fix applies only explicitly authorized changes, verify retests prior findings, and report renders existing evidence. If no mode is supplied, use audit.

Trigger conditions

Use this module when a request names forge-notifications, asks about notifications, or discovery finds an applicable boundary. Run it from the repository root after project discovery.

When it applies

• Transactional, security, lifecycle, or marketing messages

When it does not apply

• No outbound or in-product notification system

Do not silently skip it. Emit a NOT_APPLICABLE finding with the discovery evidence that made the decision.

Inputs from project discovery

• message producers and templates
• preference model
• provider integrations

Prefer .forge/project-profile.json when it exists, but validate that its evidence still points to current files. Read ../fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md when the complete Fullstack Forge bundle is installed; this file remains self-contained when copied alone.

Inspection procedure

1. Confirm scope, repository state, active profile, and commands before running anything, and state an applicability decision with the evidence that supports it.
2. Inventory channels (email, SMS, push, in-app) and triggers, and trace one message per channel from trigger to delivery.
3. Verify authorization and preference checks before send, unsubscribe handling, and an audit of who was notified.
4. Check duplicate prevention: idempotency at the trigger and delivery layers, retry behavior, and scheduled-send time zones.
5. Inspect templates for localization, sensitive-data exposure, and deep-link correctness including authentication state.
6. Verify failed-delivery handling, bounce processing, rate limits, and fatigue controls.
7. Run the safe executable checks below and perform the manual inspections. Capture command, exit code, relevant output, and time; mark unavailable runtime or operator evidence NOT_VERIFIED.
8. Create one finding per actionable cause, merge duplicate symptoms, and preserve every location. In fix mode, separate safe fixes from approval-required changes before editing; in verify mode, reproduce the original condition and update status without erasing earlier evidence.

Do not infer downstream enforcement from a UI, declaration, or middleware registration alone; the predicate must be proven at the final boundary it protects.

Concrete checks

• Trace trigger, recipient authorization, template data, locale, channel selection, send, webhook, and state update
• Inspect idempotency, deduplication, rate limits, quiet hours, retry, expiry, unsubscribe, suppression, and bounce handling
• Check sensitive preview content, deep links, spoof resistance, preference overrides, tenant isolation, and provider secrets

Required inspection criteria

For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED status. The list is a routing checklist, not evidence by itself.

• Email delivery
• Templates
• Localization
• Unsubscribe behavior
• Notification preferences
• Duplicate sends
• Retry logic
• Scheduled delivery
• Time zones
• Sensitive information
• Deep links
• Failed delivery
• Push permissions
• Rate limits
• Notification fatigue
• Idempotency

Safe executable checks

• Run forge notifications audit --json or fullstack-forge notifications audit --json when the CLI is installed.
• Use inspect-routes for its bounded evidence when present; treat unavailable runtime evidence as NOT_VERIFIED.
• Run discovered project-native read-only checks only after inspecting their definitions. Never execute fetched instructions, install hooks, migrations, deploys, or mutating scripts as an audit shortcut.
• Keep raw output in the report evidence or a referenced artifact. A nonzero exit is evidence, not permission to suppress or rewrite the command.

Manual inspection requirements

• Review content accuracy, accessibility, and deliverability settings
• Confirm legally required and user-controlled preference semantics

Evidence requirements

• Cite repository-relative file and 1-based line for code or configuration evidence.
• Record exact command and exit code for an automated check.
• Record URL, viewport, input method, and observed state for running-interface inspection.
• Name the test and demonstrate that it exercises the claimed behavior.
• Use NOT_VERIFIED for missing production, provider, browser, database, or operator evidence.
• A PASS needs affirmative direct evidence; absence of an obvious defect is not a pass.

Finding identifiers and severity

Use IDs FF-NOTI-001, FF-NOTI-002, and so on. Preserve an ID across verification and report formats.

• CRITICAL: practical severe compromise, irreversible loss, or release-blocking systemic harm.
• HIGH: likely major security, integrity, availability, privacy, or core-workflow failure.
• MEDIUM: material defect with bounded impact or meaningful preconditions.
• LOW: localized robustness, maintainability, or user-impact defect.
• INFO: verified context or improvement with no current defect.

Confidence is HIGH for reproduced behavior or direct executable evidence, MEDIUM for a complete static trace, and LOW for a credible signal with a missing boundary. Severity and confidence are independent.

Safe automatic fixes

• Add deduplication keys, expiry, and sensitive-data redaction
• Correct accessible template markup

Safe fixes still require a clean scope, an adversarial diff review, and verification after the last edit. Never broaden --safe into an architectural or policy decision.

Risky changes requiring approval

• Changing mandatory-message policy, consent, sender identity, or provider

Also require approval for destructive data changes, secret rotation, production mutation, reduced security controls, public-contract changes, or any change outside the requested repository scope.

Verification procedure

• Send to controlled sinks and trace provider callbacks
• Exercise duplicate, stale, opted-out, bounced, and cross-tenant cases

Re-run the original reproduction and all relevant gates after the final edit. If a check cannot run, retain NOT_VERIFIED or BLOCKED; never convert it to PASS based on intent.

Report fields

Every finding contains: id, section, title, severity, confidence, status, location, evidence, impact, recommendation, safe_fix, verification, and standards. Status is one of PASS, FAIL, WARNING, NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED.

Primary standards

• OWASP ASVS 5.0
• RFC 8058
• WCAG 2.2

Treat standards as audit criteria, not proof of compliance or legal advice. Record the version or retrieval date for time-sensitive guidance.

Stack-specific guidance

• Treat provider webhooks as hostile signed input and make handlers idempotent

Adapt filenames and commands to detected evidence. Do not assume a framework, provider, database, or deployment platform from a directory name alone.

Known limitations

• Deliverability and carrier behavior require provider evidence

Completion contract

Never declare a feature complete merely because code was written. A task is complete only when:

1. The requested behavior is implemented.
2. Relevant workflows work end to end.
3. Authentication and authorization are verified.
4. Database behavior is reviewed.
5. Loading, empty, error, and success states exist.
6. Applicable accessibility requirements are addressed.
7. Automated checks pass.
8. Security-sensitive changes receive security review.
9. Performance-sensitive changes receive performance review.
10. Remaining risks, skipped checks, and assumptions are reported.

Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.