evaluating-style-transfers

スター14

フォーク1

更新日2026年5月14日 17:35

Guidelines for evaluating artistic style transfers.

インストール

Codex または Claude でインストールこの Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。

ソース

TIGER-AI-Lab

TIGER-AI-Lab/RewardHarness

ダウンロード

Evaluating Style Transfers

When evaluating prompts that ask for a style change (e.g., "mosaic-tile", "Michael Angelo", "Gustav Klimt"):

Style Accuracy: Does the image genuinely reflect the requested style? Look for characteristic brushstrokes, textures, or color palettes.
Content Preservation: Are the original subjects and composition still recognizable? A good style transfer applies the style without completely destroying the underlying content.
Over-editing: Did the model replace the subject with something entirely different (e.g., replacing a bear with a generic Klimt painting)? This is a failure.
Consistency: Is the style applied consistently across the entire image, or are there jarring patches of the original photo?

このリポジトリの他の Skills

同じリポジトリ

Score completeness of instruction execution. Partial edits get partial credit; missed sub-steps cost points.

Guidance on penalizing artifacts while allowing conceptual unrealism if requested by the prompt.

Extracts and analyzes text within images to verify spelling, placement, and clarity.

Guidelines for evaluating background replacements and scene changes.

Guidelines for evaluating prompts with multiple distinct instructions.

Guidelines for evaluating object replacements and modifications.

description	Guidelines for evaluating artistic style transfers.
name	evaluating-style-transfers
type	skill

When evaluating prompts that ask for a style change (e.g., "mosaic-tile", "Michael Angelo", "Gustav Klimt"):

Style Accuracy: Does the image genuinely reflect the requested style? Look for characteristic brushstrokes, textures, or color palettes.
Content Preservation: Are the original subjects and composition still recognizable? A good style transfer applies the style without completely destroying the underlying content.
Over-editing: Did the model replace the subject with something entirely different (e.g., replacing a bear with a generic Klimt painting)? This is a failure.
Consistency: Is the style applied consistently across the entire image, or are there jarring patches of the original photo?