enforce-logical-consistency

スター14

フォーク1

更新日2026年5月14日 17:35

Ensures the reasoning chain does not contain internal contradictions between stated facts and image evaluations.

インストール

Codex または Claude でインストールこの Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。

ソース

TIGER-AI-Lab

TIGER-AI-Lab/RewardHarness

ダウンロード

Enforce Logical Consistency

When evaluating images, your reasoning must remain logically consistent from start to finish.

Establish Facts Clearly: If you define a factual premise or aesthetic (e.g., "New York subways are typically industrial, dirty, and utilitarian"), you must anchor your evaluation to this premise.
Avoid Direct Contradictions: Do not state a fact and then reward an image for the exact opposite. For example, you cannot praise an image for being "sleek, modern, and metallic" and then claim this makes it "closer to the typical New York subway appearance."
Check Your Conclusion: Before finalizing your preference, review your reasoning. Does your final choice actually embody the characteristics you defined as correct at the beginning of your analysis? If not, adjust your preference or re-evaluate the images.

このリポジトリの他の Skills

同じリポジトリ

Score completeness of instruction execution. Partial edits get partial credit; missed sub-steps cost points.

Guidance on penalizing artifacts while allowing conceptual unrealism if requested by the prompt.

Extracts and analyzes text within images to verify spelling, placement, and clarity.

Guidelines for evaluating background replacements and scene changes.

Guidelines for evaluating prompts with multiple distinct instructions.

Guidelines for evaluating object replacements and modifications.

description	Ensures the reasoning chain does not contain internal contradictions between stated facts and image evaluations.
name	enforce-logical-consistency
type	skill

When evaluating images, your reasoning must remain logically consistent from start to finish.

Establish Facts Clearly: If you define a factual premise or aesthetic (e.g., "New York subways are typically industrial, dirty, and utilitarian"), you must anchor your evaluation to this premise.
Avoid Direct Contradictions: Do not state a fact and then reward an image for the exact opposite. For example, you cannot praise an image for being "sleek, modern, and metallic" and then claim this makes it "closer to the typical New York subway appearance."
Check Your Conclusion: Before finalizing your preference, review your reasoning. Does your final choice actually embody the characteristics you defined as correct at the beginning of your analysis? If not, adjust your preference or re-evaluate the images.