メニュー
Verifies and formats FeCIM physics/measurement claims against the project's published-source list and docs/4-research/honesty-audit.md. Use when adding a numeric claim, accuracy figure, or device-parameter assertion to code, docs, PR descriptions, or commit messages.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Audits Go code for goroutine-to-widget access without fyne.Do(...) wrapping, the project's most common GUI freeze cause. Use when reviewing a PR that adds goroutines, async I/O, or simulation tickers in any pkg/gui/ or shell package.
Runs build flows for the canonical Fyne shell and module commands on this Go 1.25 monorepo. Use when building, packaging, or debugging build failures in cmd/fecim-lattice-tools or module GUI commands.
Relentlessly interviews the user about a proposed FeCIM physics, simulation, or GUI change before any code is written — covering source citation, educational-vs-validated framing, TDD-RED test, thread-safety, and honesty-audit alignment. Use when starting a non-trivial change to physics, ISPP, crossbar, or GUI logic.
Runs the FeCIM test matrix (full, race, module-scoped, coverage, golden regen) and interprets physics regression failures using the 5 known bug patterns. Use when running tests, debugging test failures, or regenerating physics golden files.
Enforces docs/4-research/honesty-audit.md policy by scanning PR diffs, READMEs, and presentation material for removed/unverified claims (87% MNIST, 30-states-as-fact, energy multipliers vs NAND/GPUs). Use before committing docs, PRs, or release notes that include accuracy or efficiency numbers.
Surveys FeCIM domain knowledge by searching references/, citations/, docs/4-research/, and the local Cognee KG, then synthesizes a cited research note. Use when investigating a physics topic, evaluating a paper, or grounding a design decision in literature.
| name | fecim-citation |
| description | Verifies and formats FeCIM physics/measurement claims against the project's published-source list and docs/4-research/honesty-audit.md. Use when adding a numeric claim, accuracy figure, or device-parameter assertion to code, docs, PR descriptions, or commit messages. |
Validate any quantitative or device-physics claim before it lands in code, docs, or commit messages. See tools/fecim-skills/_shared/fecim-context.md (Honesty-audit policy) for the rule list.
Parse the claim. Extract: subject (e.g., HZO coercive field), value (e.g., 1.0 MV/cm), context (educational vs validated).
Match to canonical sources (tools/fecim-skills/_shared/fecim-context.md table) and the current source/audit files (docs/4-research/honesty-audit.md, references/, and citations/ if present). If the claim corresponds to a published source, format as:
<claim text> (Materlik 2015)
Check honesty-audit removed/unverified list:
For uncited claims, suggest one of:
Output:
Claim: <as written>
Status: verified | educational-default | removed-unverified | needs-source
Suggested wording: <if change needed>
Citation: <short form, DOI or source path if applicable>
Evidence boundary: <what the source verifies and what it does not verify>
removed-unverified; suggested wording reframes as the simulation pipeline's accuracy with explicit educational label, OR points to HZO FTJ 2025's 98.24% with "not a FeCIM device claim" caveat.Citation review is observation — TDD: N/A. Code/doc edits triggered by review follow the project's TDD hard-rule per tools/fecim-skills/_shared/tdd-evidence-template.md.