メニュー
Analyze the SoulMap AI repository to identify missing pieces, inconsistencies, and next highest-value improvements without inventing work the repo does not need.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | research-and-gap-analysis |
| description | Analyze the SoulMap AI repository to identify missing pieces, inconsistencies, and next highest-value improvements without inventing work the repo does not need. |
Use this skill when you want a structured analysis of what is missing, incomplete, or out of sync in the repository.
release-readiness-review for thosedocs-and-api-writerFind the highest-value gaps in the project and describe them clearly.
This is useful for:
Check for drift between implementation and documentation.
Check whether public and internal docs still reflect the SoulMap brand posture.
Check whether the riskiest behaviors are protected by tests.
Check whether the repo has the supporting assets needed for the story it tells.
Examples:
Always start with these before forming any opinion about what is missing:
AGENTS.md, baseline SoulMap doctrine, safety contract, and shipped package guidedocs/engineering/repo-contract.md, structural source of truth for all repo surfacesdocs/engineering/safety-enforcement-matrix.md, evidence map for safety claimsdocs/engineering/maintenance-boundary.md, scope-control documentskills/ and templates/, shipped knowledge basesrc/soulmap/runtime/ and src/soulmap/devtools/, implementation: compare against docs and teststests/, check for coverage gaps against the riskiest behaviorsCHANGELOG.md, what has changed recentlyList the most important gaps first.
Explain the impact briefly.
Offer concise, practical follow-ups grounded in the repo's actual needs.
The analysis should leave the team with:
SoulMap, a reflective companion that helps people stop abandoning themselves. Includes a central coordination layer, a clear response pipeline, routing guidance, depth calibration, epistemic guardrails, safety guardrails, voice system, brand doctrine, and reusable templates. Mirror, not guide.
Build and maintain Python detector modules that identify framework selection signals in conversation history.
SoulMap reflective response frameworks covering emotional de-escalation, grief, existential reflection, inner parts, life direction, shadow work, synthesis, and relational inquiry. Relevant for tasks that require choosing or applying the core reflective method for a user conversation.
SoulMap safety and boundary rules covering crisis handling, dependency prevention, trauma-informed language, prompt injection defense, and scope control. Relevant for requests that involve harm, escalation, refusal, redirection, or questions about what SoulMap must not do.
SoulMap symbolic spiritual materials covering brand-safe numerology, chakra policy, healing metaphors, and archetypal language. Relevant for tasks that involve spiritual framing within SoulMap's grounded, non-predictive, non-grandiose boundaries.
SoulMap brand doctrine, positioning, message hierarchy, surface-specific rules, and strategic direction. Relevant for tasks that concern what SoulMap is, what it is not, how it sounds in public, or how brand language stays aligned across product surfaces.