uberblick

name	uberblick
description	Run /uberblick as a guided MCP workflow using workflow_hints and role-agent playbooks
disable-model-invocation	true
argument-hint	[page UUID or optional keyword filter]

You are starting an Uberblick working session. Follow these steps exactly:

Step 0 — Check for a direct page ID

If $ARGUMENTS looks like a UUID (e.g. 019c93b0-72eb-71a1-8cdf-c8c6803a9056), skip Steps 1–3 and go directly to Step 4, using that UUID as the page id.

Step 0.5 — Route bug intake directly when appropriate

If the user's request, or a newly discovered issue during the session, is primarily about broken behavior now, a regression, or triage intake rather than planning/execution work:

1. Fetch uberblick://docs/bug-guide.
2. Use list_bugs to check for existing similar bugs.
3. Use create_bug_tool when a new bug is the right artifact.
4. If bug filing fully resolves the request, stop. Otherwise continue and link the bug from the related PRD/RFC instead of turning the planning record into a bug report.

Step 1 — List workspaces

Call the list_workspaces MCP tool to get all workspaces.

Step 2 — Fetch active planning records

For each workspace returned:

1. Call list_prds with that workspace_id.
2. Call list_rfcs with that workspace_id.

Collect all records where parent_status is "to_do" or "in_progress" (exclude "complete").

If $ARGUMENTS was provided (and is not a UUID), filter further to records whose title contains the argument (case-insensitive).

If no active records exist, tell the user and stop.

Step 3 — Let the user pick

Present the records as options. Format each option as: [type][status_name] Title (e.g. [PRD][Draft] Auth Revamp). Group by workspace name if there are multiple workspaces. Limit to 4 options per question; if more exist, ask the user to provide a keyword to narrow down.

Step 4 — Load context and workflow contracts

Once the user picks a PRD or RFC:

1. Call get_page with the selected record id.
2. Call get_resource for:
   • uberblick://docs/workflow
   • uberblick://docs/workflow-roles
3. Call get_linked_pages with id: "prd:<uuid>" or id: "rfc:<uuid>" depending on record type.
4. For each linked PRD/RFC, call get_page to load context.
5. Read workflow_hints from the selected record response and store:
   • stage
   • role_sequence
   • active_role (present for RFCs and in-progress PRDs)
   • active_role_instruction (present when active_role is set)
   • next_role (present for Draft PRDs in to_do status — offer-only, do not auto-run)
   • confirmation_required
   • pending_completion_checks

Step 5 — Brief the user

Present a concise briefing:

• Selected record title/type/status
• Current stage from workflow_hints.stage
• Active role from workflow_hints.active_role (or available role from workflow_hints.next_role.role if active_role is absent)
• Linked records (titles + status)
• Pending completion checks from workflow_hints.pending_completion_checks

Step 6 — Run the active role

If workflow_hints.next_role is present and workflow_hints.active_role is absent (Draft PRD):

• Inform the user that next_role.role is available (e.g. "prd-critic is available — want me to run a critique pass?").
• Do not auto-run the role. Wait for user confirmation.
• If the user confirms, run the role using next_role.role and next_role.description as the instruction.

Otherwise, map workflow_hints.active_role to a local role definition file:

• prd-critic -> ./agents/prd-critic.md
• rfc-architect -> ./agents/rfc-architect.md
• implementation-reviewer -> ./agents/implementation-reviewer.md
• docs-integrity-checker -> ./agents/docs-integrity-checker.md

Path resolution rule: resolve ./agents/... relative to this SKILL.md file's directory (the skill folder), not the repository root.

Execute the active role using:

1. the selected record content,
2. linked PRD/RFC context,
3. workflow_hints.active_role_instruction,
4. the role file's output contract.
5. Enforce artifact boundary:
   • PRD findings must stay at product-requirement level.
   • Technical/design specifics must be output only as RFC Remarks (brief reminders). Keep this high-level only: technical and implementation details do not belong in the PRD.
6. Enforce decision-source boundary:
   • Keep unresolved product decisions in gaps_and_ambiguities only (single source of truth).
   • In persisted PRD content, render this section header as Gaps and ambiguities (human-readable). The underscore form is identifier-only.
   • Do not create a second action list that repeats the same items with different wording.
   • PM/owner decisions should be captured as comments/discussion on those gaps.
7. If active role is rfc-architect and unresolved PRD decisions remain:
   • present option paths directly in the live LLM session for PM selection,
   • do not write those option menus into PRD body content.

If the role file is missing, continue using workflow_hints.active_role_instruction plus uberblick://docs/workflow-roles.

Step 7 — Write outputs through MCP tools

Never treat local role output as final state until it is written through MCP.

• Use update_prd_tool for PRD records.
• Use update_rfc_tool for RFC records.

When relevant, include:

• content updates,
• status updates,
• completion_gate_update for page_sync_handoff / docs_drift_audit.

Follow the active role's agent file output contract for content structure and decision-handling rules.

Page Impact rule for PRD writes:

• If touching ## Page Impact, keep every entry in validator-compatible checklist form from uberblick://docs/markdown-spec.
• Actionable entries must contain [Title](page:UUID) or uberblick://docs/...; if none apply, use exactly one checked no-update line.
• Before setting completion checks to acknowledged, ensure every actionable entry is checked.

Active comment-anchor migration rule:

• When rewriting/removing text that contains active {comment:thread_uuid}...{/comment:thread_uuid} markers, reposition each marker onto the new decision/result sentence in the updated content.
• Never drop an active marker during update_prd_tool / update_rfc_tool writes.
• If no equivalent sentence exists, add a short Decision: (or Resolution:) line and attach the marker there before submitting.

After each write, do not auto-refetch with get_page. Re-fetch only when required:

• verifying final status / completion-gate outcomes,
• recovering from ambiguous update errors, or
• reading fields not returned by the update response.

Step 8 — Handle blocked transitions

If a status move to complete is blocked:

1. parse missing_checks and required_sequence from the error payload,
2. run the missing role/workflow action directly,
3. retry with one update_prd_tool / update_rfc_tool call that includes:
   • target status_id,
   • completion_gate_update for all resolved checks,
4. fetch guidance_resources only if the payload is unclear/contradictory,
5. verify via get_page only for touched records involved in the retry.

Do not set acknowledged before the corresponding action is complete. Do not move one linked PRD/RFC to Done while another linked record is still blocked.

Step 9 — Start implementation work (developer session)

When coding is in scope:

1. ALWAYS work in a branch.
2. Follow repository instructions (docs/instructions/).
3. Before the first code edit, enforce execution-entry status:
   • if current parent_status is not "in_progress":
     • call list_statuses with parent: "in_progress",
     • choose the most appropriate in-progress status for execution start (prefer exact name In Progress; otherwise the closest equivalent),
     • call update_prd_tool or update_rfc_tool with that status_id.
4. If status transition fails, stop implementation work and report the blocker; do not write code changes until resolved.
5. Keep linked PRD/RFC records intentionally in sync.

Step 10 — Open PR Early (Draft) and Push Incrementally

Do this shortly after the first meaningful implementation commit.

1. Push the branch and open a draft PR (title from PRD; body includes PRD UUID + short summary).
2. Keep pushing incremental commits throughout implementation.
3. Keep the PR in draft until implementation and validation are complete.
4. If draft PR creation fails, report the blocker and retry after the next push.

Step 11 — Wrap up: status, review handoff, and docs

Do this when implementation is complete.

1. Determine intended handoff status:
   • if PR is open: use the highest in_progress status (typically In Review),
   • if PR is merged: use the default complete status (typically Done).
2. If PR is draft, mark it ready for review.
3. If PR is open, request Copilot review by adding reviewer app/github-copilot. If this fails, note the error and continue.
4. Audit only likely-drift docs:
   • target explicitly touched docs + PRD Page Impact targets,
   • fetch those pages in parallel,
   • update only pages with stale facts.
5. Status sync in one pass (parallel where safe):
   • list every touched PRD/RFC,
   • call one update_prd_tool / update_rfc_tool per record with final status_id,
   • when moving to complete, include completion_gate_update in that same call,
   • if any status update fails, stop and fix before continuing.
6. Verification gate (required):
   • call get_page once per touched PRD/RFC after status updates,
   • verify each record is in intended handoff status,
   • verify linked PRD/RFC statuses are intentionally aligned (no accidental mixed final states).
7. Report a final status summary in the handoff message:
   • record_id
   • record_type (prd/rfc)
   • final_status_name

Step 12 — Monitor CI and PR comments

Run this step only while the PR is open. If the PR is already merged, skip to Step 13.

1. Periodically check PR status (gh pr checks) and comments (gh pr view --comments).
2. If CI is failing, inspect failed logs (gh run view --log-failed), fix issues, commit, and push.
3. For PR comments:
   • fix actionable correctness/standards issues and reply on the PR
   • leave purely stylistic/opinion comments for human judgment
4. Continue until CI is green and no actionable comments remain.

Step 13 — Claude/Codex parity check

Before final signoff, ensure this session did not violate policy parity:

• gate behavior and completion_gate_update rules match MCP responses,
• workflow_hints stage/role sequence was respected,
• manual web UI status remains authoritative and is not auto-reverted.

Report the final PR URL to the user.