メニュー
Generate asset-actions.yaml from ASSETS.yaml by classifying assets into priority tiers. Use when the user asks to regenerate, update, or refresh the asset actions.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals --skill generate-asset-actionsコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Crawl repository PRs, issues, and review comments to distill institutional knowledge into a shared knowledge base. Run periodically by "context agents" to maintain agent_artefacts/repo_context/REPO_CONTEXT.md. Trigger only on specific request.
Use Inspect Scout to analyze agent trajectories from evaluation log files. Runs default and custom scanners to detect external failures, formatting issues, reward hacking, and ethical refusals. Use when user asks to check/analyze agent trajectories. Trigger when the user asks you to run the "Check Agent Trajectories" workflow.
CI and GitHub Actions maintenance workflows — fix a failing test from a CI URL, fix a failing smoke test, add @pytest.mark.slow markers to slow tests, or review a PR against agent-checkable standards. Use when user asks to fix a failing test, fix a smoke test, mark slow tests, or review a PR. Trigger when the user asks you to run the "Write a PR For A Failing Test", "Fix A Failing Smoke Test", "Mark Slow Tests", or "Review PR According to Agent-Checkable Standards" workflow.
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | generate-asset-actions |
| description | Generate asset-actions.yaml from ASSETS.yaml by classifying assets into priority tiers. Use when the user asks to regenerate, update, or refresh the asset actions. |
Regenerate internal/audits/asset-actions.yaml and internal/audits/audit-summary.md from ASSETS.yaml.
If ASSETS.yaml may be stale, run uv run python tools/generate_asset_manifest.py first.
Run uv run python tools/summarise_asset_manifest.py to get aggregate counts (by type, by state, totals). Use these numbers when populating audit-summary.md.
Read ASSETS.yaml. For each asset, determine target stage first, then priority. Process both state: floating assets AND state: pinned assets that match known-unstable sources (since their target is controlled, they are not yet at their target stage).
The target stage depends on host reliability, not asset type:
controlled (Stage 2) — any asset where upstream has broken before, maintainer is unresponsive/deprecated, OR host is unreliable (personal repos, Google Drive, .edu domains, university servers, any host without version control). This applies to git_clone, direct_url, and huggingface alike.pinned (Stage 1) — assets on reliable, version-controlled hosts (GitHub, HuggingFace, well-known CDNs) with no history of breakage.Per ADR-0007: "Anything hosted on a less reliable domain (personal websites, Google Drive, university servers, or any host without version control) should skip straight to Stage 2."
pinned.controlled.drive.google.com, .edu domains, personal repos/websites) not already in the known-unstable registry. Target is controlled.For assets with state: pinned and a {SHA} placeholder but no checksum, classify as Low (target: pinned with checksum).
Omit assets already at their target stage.
Every entry needs: eval, source, type, state, target, action, reason.
Update this list when new instability is discovered.
| Source | Eval | Incident |
|---|---|---|
xlang-ai/OSWorld | osworld | Files removed (PR #958) |
openai/evals | makemesay | Deprecated upstream |
corebench.cs.princeton.edu | core_bench | University server, no versioning |
epatey/fonts | osworld | Personal repo |
ShishirPatil/gorilla | bfcl | Data format issues (PR #954) |
yunx-z/MLRC-Bench | mlrc_bench | Broken task |
LRudL/sad | sad | Upstream bugs (issues #7, #8) |
meg-tong/sycophancy-eval | sycophancy | Invalid JSON/NaN, workaround in code |
josancamon/paperbench | paperbench | Paper ID mismatch (HF discussion #2) |
sentientfutures/moru-benchmark | moru | Exact duplicate rows |
asset-actions.yaml parses as valid YAMLfloating_assets + needing_checksums + no_action_needed == total_external_assetsaudit-summary.md match output of summarise_asset_manifest.py