name: backoffice-permissions
description: Add or modify an access permission in a cardona-core-service backoffice — a new PermissionType enum key, its access-management group entry, and its English label on the roles screen. Use this whenever the user wants to add/register a permission, grant access to a section, wire a backoffice-* access key, or edit the permissions config — even phrased as "add access for X", "new permission key", "дай доступ к разделу", "добавь пермишен". Also the first stage when creating a whole new section, but it stands alone: reach for it any time only a permission needs to change, without touching routes, menu, or pages.
Add a Permission
The target is a Vue 3 + TS + Pinia + Vuetify backoffice built on cardona-core-service. Access is driven by a single enum + a grouped config that also renders the roles/access-management screen. This skill adds one permission end to end: the enum key, the group entry (in the right order), and the localized label.
This is a self-contained task. It is Stage 1 of creating a new section, but most of the time you only need a permission — do just this and stop.
Execution model — delegate to the worker subagent
This skill can run in a dedicated subagent so the main window stays clean and the edits run on a cheaper model (Sonnet). Route by who you are:
- You are the main assistant (the user asked to add/change a permission): first gather the inputs — permission key (
backoffice-*, from the backend — don't guess), localized name, target group + the neighbor to place after, type (Table/Switch), any notAccessLevel. The subagent can't stop to ask, so collect these before launching. Then launch the Agent tool with subagent_type: 'backoffice-permissions', passing all inputs in the prompt. Relay its final summary to the user verbatim.
- You are the
backoffice-permissions subagent (your system prompt says so): execute the steps below and return only the summary, as your system prompt requires.
If the subagent is unavailable, fall back to running the steps inline — delegation is the intended path, but the steps below stand on their own.
Files
src/configs/permissions.ts — the PermissionType string enum + the default export object of permission groups (each an array of entry objects). This file only builds the access-management UI; nothing in it imports routes/menu/list, so editing it is safe in isolation.src/plugins/i18n/locales/en.json — the human-readable name shown on the roles screen.
What to ask
| What | Behavior |
|---|
Permission key (backoffice-<...>) | Must ask — comes from the backend, not derived from the section name. Do not guess. |
| Localized name (en.json value) | Suggest from the key/section (vipSeasons → "VIP Seasons") and confirm. |
| Enum name (PascalCase) | Derive from the key: backoffice-season-vip-status → BackofficeSeasonVipStatus. |
| Group + placement | Which group (Gamification, Players, Promo, Settings, …) and which neighbor to sit after. |
| Type | Table (access levels 0–4) or Switch (binary). Default Table. |
What to do
-
Add to enum PermissionType, near thematically related keys:
BackofficeSeasonVipStatus = 'backoffice-season-vip-status',
-
Add to the group's default array. Order matters — it must match the intended menu order, because the roles screen renders in this same order:
{
target: PermissionType.BackofficeSeasonVipStatus,
type: PermissionFormType.Table,
},
type: PermissionFormType.Table (levels 0–4) or PermissionFormType.Switch (binary on/off).notAccessLevel: [2, 4] — forbidden levels when the backend doesn't support create/delete. Only add if similar nearby sections already use it; otherwise default to Table with no restrictions.
-
Add to en.json among the other backoffice-* keys:
"backoffice-season-vip-status": "VIP Seasons",
Check
Confirm to the user: added <key> (enum <EnumName>) to group <group> after <sibling>, label "<Label>". Run yarn typecheck && yarn lint.
If this permission is for a brand-new section, the next steps are the section-list skill (list page) and then section-form skill (create/update) — but only continue if the user asked for the full section.
