メニュー
Draft, revise, or audit point-by-point reviewer responses for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent manuscripts. Use for rebuttal, major revision, response letter, experiment planning, limitation rewriting, and claim softening.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
Search, plan, and organize literature for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent research. Use for finding papers, building related-work maps, identifying baselines, benchmark provenance, citation gaps, and recent work tracking.
Build, audit, and organize citation evidence for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent manuscripts. Use for related work matrices, citation gaps, DOI/BibTeX checks, baseline provenance, benchmark provenance, and Nature-style support for claims.
Prepare Data Availability, Code Availability, Model Availability, Prompt Availability, and reproducibility statements for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent manuscripts.
Help legally obtain, organize, and archive academic papers, PDFs, BibTeX, supplementary files, code links, and benchmark documents for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent research. Do not bypass paywalls or access controls.
Create, revise, or audit Nature-style scientific figures for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent papers. Use for Python/R plotting, training curves, ablations, benchmark bars, architecture diagrams, agent workflow figures, trajectory visualizations, and publication export QA.
Build a repeatable literature discovery, scoring, reading, and archiving pipeline for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent research. Use for daily/weekly paper tracking, topic watchlists, benchmark monitoring, and research-note automation.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | nature-response |
| description | Draft, revise, or audit point-by-point reviewer responses for RL, MARL, LLM, and LLM Agent manuscripts. Use for rebuttal, major revision, response letter, experiment planning, limitation rewriting, and claim softening. |
| version | 2.0.0-agent-rl |
Be respectful, concrete and evidence-driven. Never answer a technical criticism with only rhetorical reassurance.
Response strategy:
- main risk:
- revision package:
Reviewer comment 1:
Response:
Manuscript changes:
Additional experiments/analysis:
Remaining limitation:
Revision checklist:
- ...
Do not fabricate completed experiments. Use “we will add / we have added” only according to the user's status. Do not attack the reviewer.