メニュー
Same problem given to N agents in parallel; merge proposals. Use when you want N independent attempts at the same goal and a synthesized merge. Distinct from /parallel (N different things) and /council (adversarial debate with roles).
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Ask. Achieve. The canonical user-facing entry to claudemax — describe your goal, the SOTA-2026 pipeline (deepresearch → multispec → parallel /goal → verify) handles the rest. Same engine as /cmax with a friendlier verb. CLI equivalent is `cmax ask "<goal>"`.
The default FAT umbrella. Auto-runs deepresearch + multispec decomposition + parallel /goal + verify. Opus for planning/judgment/verification; Sonnet for sub-Spec execution (escalates per router). Multispec engine selects Mode A (SDK subagents) or Mode B (Claude Code Agent Teams) automatically based on work size. Your default daily-driver.
Max-effectiveness umbrella. Opus for EVERYTHING — planning, decomposition, sub-Spec /goal execution, verification. Use for novel domains, security/auth/payments, or when you want the highest ceiling regardless of cost.
Show the model-routing decision for a task (Fable/Opus/Sonnet/Haiku) with reasoning. Use before launching a packet to sanity-check the tier and to override when you have stronger judgment than the heuristic.
Reviews a proposed diff for correctness, security, style, taste alignment. Distinct from /audit (which reviews existing code, not diffs) and /verify (which checks SPEC completion).
Spec quality gate. Every completion condition must have a mechanically-checkable verifyHint (file path, command, test name, behavior). Blocks /goal handoff if the spec wouldn't be verifiable.
| name | hive |
| description | Same problem given to N agents in parallel; merge proposals. Use when you want N independent attempts at the same goal and a synthesized merge. Distinct from /parallel (N different things) and /council (adversarial debate with roles). |
N independent agents draft a proposal for the same problem; a merger synthesizes them into one superior answer.
~4× /opussonnet for the same problem (3 proposers + 1 merger). Worth it for irreversible decisions; overkill for routine work.
