ワンクリックでManusで任意のスキルを実行

rubric-writer

スター472

フォーク36

更新日2026年4月14日 11:50

Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report. **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: `paper-review` pipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`（以及可选 novelty matrix）。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪（claims/evidence gaps 缺失）或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议（actionable feedback），并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact；避免泛泛而谈。

インストール

Codex または Claude でインストールこの Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。

Manusで実行

ソース

WILLOSCAR

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

GitHub リポジトリを開く Creator のリポジトリを見る

ダウンロード

Manusで実行

Rubric Writer

Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.

Inputs

Required:

output/CLAIMS.md
output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md

Optional:

output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md
DECISIONS.md

Output

output/REVIEW.md

Contract

The review must expose stable sections:

### Summary
### Novelty
### Soundness
### Clarity
### Impact
### Major Concerns
### Minor Comments
### Recommendation

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

read prior review artifacts
render the stable rubric sections
keep the review bounded and traceable

It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.

Acceptance

output/REVIEW.md exists
includes all stable rubric sections
recommendation is explicit

Non-goals

deep manuscript parsing
novelty retrieval
writing an author rebuttal

このリポジトリの他の Skills

同じリポジトリ

agent-survey-corpus

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Download a small corpus of open-access arXiv survey/review PDFs about agentic systems and extract text for style learning. **Trigger**: agent survey corpus, ref corpus, download surveys, 学习综述写法, 下载 survey. **Use when**: you want to study how real agent surveys structure sections (6–8 H2), size subsections, and write evidence-backed comparisons. **Skip if**: you cannot download PDFs (no network) or you don't want local PDF files. **Network**: required. **Guardrail**: only download arXiv PDFs; store under `ref/` and keep large files out of git.

2026-05-30472

global-reviewer

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Global consistency review for survey drafts: terminology, cross-section coherence, and scope/citation hygiene. Writes `output/GLOBAL_REVIEW.md` and (optionally) applies safe edits to `output/DRAFT.md`. **Trigger**: global review, consistency check, coherence audit, 术语一致性, 全局回看, 章节呼应, 拷打 writer. **Use when**: Draft exists and you want a final evidence-first coherence pass before LaTeX/PDF. **Skip if**: You are still changing the outline/mapping/notes (do those first), or prose writing is not approved. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: Do not invent facts or citations; do not add new citation keys; treat missing evidence as a failure signal.

2026-05-30472

literature-engineer

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Multi-route literature expansion + metadata normalization for evidence-first surveys. Produces a large candidate pool (`papers/papers_raw.jsonl`, target ≥1200) with stable IDs and provenance, ready for dedupe/rank + citation generation. **Trigger**: evidence collector, literature engineer, 文献扩充, 多路召回, snowballing, cited by, references, 元信息增强, provenance. **Use when**: 需要把候选文献扩充到 ≥1200 篇并补齐可追溯 meta（survey pipeline 的 Stage C1，写作前置 evidence）。 **Skip if**: 已经有高质量 `papers/papers_raw.jsonl`（≥1200 且每条都有稳定标识+来源记录）。 **Network**: 可离线（靠 imports）；雪崩/在线检索需要网络。 **Guardrail**: 不允许编造论文；每条记录必须带稳定标识（arXiv id / DOI / 可信 URL）和 provenance；不写 output/ prose。

2026-05-30472

pdf-text-extractor

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Download PDFs (when available) and extract plain text to support full-text evidence, writing `papers/fulltext_index.jsonl` and `papers/fulltext/*.txt`. **Trigger**: PDF download, fulltext, extract text, papers/pdfs, 全文抽取, 下载PDF. **Use when**: `queries.md` 设置 `evidence_mode: fulltext`（或你明确需要全文证据）并希望为 paper notes/claims 提供更强 evidence。 **Skip if**: `evidence_mode: abstract`（默认）；或你不希望进行下载/抽取（成本/权限/时间）。 **Network**: fulltext 下载通常需要网络（除非你手工提供 PDF 缓存在 `papers/pdfs/`）。 **Guardrail**: 缓存下载到 `papers/pdfs/`；默认不覆盖已有抽取文本（除非显式要求重抽）。

2026-05-30472

prose-writer

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Write `output/DRAFT.md` (or `output/SNAPSHOT.md`) from an approved outline and evidence packs, using only verified citation keys from `citations/ref.bib`. **Trigger**: write draft, prose writer, snapshot, survey writing, 写综述, 生成草稿, section-by-section drafting. **Use when**: structure is approved (`DECISIONS.md` has `Approve C2`) and evidence packs exist (`outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl`, `outline/evidence_drafts.jsonl`). **Skip if**: approvals are missing, or evidence packs are incomplete / scaffolded (missing-fields, TODO markers). **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: do not invent facts or citations; only cite keys present in `citations/ref.bib`; avoid pipeline-jargon leakage in final prose.

2026-05-30472

schema-normalizer

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Normalize cross-skill JSONL interfaces (ids + titles + citation key formats) so downstream skills do not rely on best-effort joins. **Trigger**: schema normalize, jsonl contract, interface drift, join drift, 字段不一致, schema 规范化. **Use when**: you have generated C2-C4 JSONL artifacts (outline/briefs/bindings/packs/anchors) and want deterministic, stable fields before self-loops/writing. **Skip if**: you are not using the survey pipelines, or the workspace already has a fresh PASS `output/SCHEMA_NORMALIZATION_REPORT.md` for the current artifacts. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: NO PROSE; deterministic transforms only; do not invent evidence/claims; only fill missing ids/titles from `outline/outline.yml`.

2026-05-30472

name

rubric-writer

description

Rubric Writer

Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.

Inputs

Required:

output/CLAIMS.md
output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md

Optional:

output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md
DECISIONS.md

Output

output/REVIEW.md

Contract

The review must expose stable sections:

### Summary
### Novelty
### Soundness
### Clarity
### Impact
### Major Concerns
### Minor Comments
### Recommendation

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

read prior review artifacts
render the stable rubric sections
keep the review bounded and traceable

It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.

Acceptance

output/REVIEW.md exists
includes all stable rubric sections
recommendation is explicit

Non-goals

deep manuscript parsing
novelty retrieval
writing an author rebuttal