メニュー
Strategic review of a development plan from a product/business perspective. Challenges premises, validates market fit, checks scope decisions. Use when asked to 'strategic review', 'is this the right thing to build', or 'ceo review of the plan'.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Automated plan review. Reads the active plan file and runs strategy, engineering, and design reviews automatically. Challenges assumptions, detects scope creep, suggests alternatives. Use when asked to 'review the plan', 'check my plan', 'is this plan good', 'validate the plan', 'review before implementing', 'plan review', 'technical plan review', 'architecture review of the plan', or 'does this plan make sense'.
Web performance benchmarking. Measures TTFB, FCP, LCP, bundle sizes, and resource loading. Compares against baselines to detect regressions. Use when asked to 'benchmark', 'performance audit', 'check page speed', 'how fast is this site', 'measure load time', 'performance regression', 'check bundle size', 'analyze page performance', 'why is this slow', 'measure web vitals', or 'LCP is too high'.
Use before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation. Chat triggers: 'let's brainstorm', 'brainstorming', 'what should we build', 'how should this work', 'explore options', 'think about this', 'what are the requirements', 'design before build', 'plan this feature', 'what do we need', 'help me think through', 'creative session', 'idea exploration', 'feature brainstorm', 'requirements gathering'.
Post-deploy visual monitoring. Watches the live app after a deploy, takes screenshots, checks console errors, compares against baselines. Use when asked to 'canary', 'monitor production', 'check deploy health', 'verify the site after deploy', 'is the deploy working', 'check for regressions after deploy', 'monitor the release', 'visual health check', or 'did the deploy break anything'.
Safety guardrails for destructive commands. Warns before rm -rf, DROP TABLE, force-push, git reset --hard, and similar destructive operations. Use when asked to 'be careful', 'safety mode', 'prod mode', 'careful mode', 'don't break anything', 'warning mode', 'protect against destructive commands', 'safe mode', or 'double check before running commands'.
Save and resume working state checkpoints. Captures git state, decisions made, and remaining work so you can pick up exactly where you left off — even across sessions. Use when asked to 'checkpoint', 'save progress', 'where was I', 'resume', 'what was I working on', 'pick up where I left off', 'save my work', 'save state', 'pause this', 'come back later', or 'what's left to do'.
| name | plan-ceo-review |
| source | adapted from gstack (MIT License) |
| trigger | auto+manual |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | Strategic review of a development plan from a product/business perspective. Challenges premises, validates market fit, checks scope decisions. Use when asked to 'strategic review', 'is this the right thing to build', or 'ceo review of the plan'. |
Review a development plan from a product/business strategy perspective.
Question every assumption in the plan:
Generate 3 alternatives:
STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEW
═══════════════════════════════
Plan: {title}
## Premises
- {premise 1}: {verified/assumed} — {evidence}
- {premise 2}: {verified/assumed} — {evidence}
## Problem Fit
- Right problem? {yes/no/partially}
- Evidence: {what supports this}
- Risk: {what could be wrong}
## Scope
- Appropriate? {yes/too-big/too-small}
- Wedge: {smallest valuable thing}
- Deferred: {what was left out}
## Alternatives
1. Simpler: {description}
2. Different: {description}
3. Bigger: {description}
## Verdict
{BUILD / PIVOT / REFRAME} — {one-line rationale}