ワンクリックで
note
Record reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Record reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
Use when AI-assisted thesis edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of author control, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides spine cards, edit contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
Stop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.
Build and audit the manuscript argument system: intent, gap-contribution alignment, hierarchical claims, evidence balance, limitations, and reviewer attack surfaces. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or rebuttal needs explicit intent registers, contribution chains, claim hierarchy, argument maps, evidence-fit checks, or reviewer-risk matrices before drafting, revision, peer review, or self-review.
Review another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.
Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls. Use when asked for self-review, internal review, pre-submission review, readiness check, reviewer simulation on own work, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory, unstated assumptions, model background knowledge, or unlisted local notes must not be treated as evidence.
Reframe academic manuscript drafts that read like engineering reports, module inventories, internal validation packets, or system notes into paper-form scientific arguments with clear gap, contribution chain, results narrative, figure/table roles, AI-assisted component boundaries, and submission-readiness blockers.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | note |
| description | Record reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Glob |
This skill is triggered by: take notes, record this, /note.
This skill does not handle page reading -- that is /read. If the user says "read next page and take notes", the /read skill handles the reading, and /note handles the recording as a second step.
literature/reading_notes/{Author}_{ShortTitle}_NOTES.md. Use Glob to check if the file already exists. The {Author} is the last name of the first author. {ShortTitle} uses underscores, title case, and omits articles (e.g., Smith_Methods_NOTES.md).Last updated timestamp at the bottom of the file to today's date.Recorded: {brief description} -> {filename}If the user says "take notes" without specifying what to record, default to recording the core analysis from the last assistant message -- summary, key terms, and thesis connections.
This is the data contract shared across all skills (/read, /note, /integrate, /map, /progress). When creating a new notes file, use this exact structure:
# Reading Notes: {Author} -- {Title} ({Year})
**Source**: {single-line citation in the project's declared style — see `literature/reading_notes/_template_NOTES.md` for per-style examples; the active style is `Citation style:` in `CLAUDE.md`}
**Date read**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status**: reading
**Relevance**: {which chapter/section this maps to}
---
## Key Arguments
- {bullet points summarising the main arguments}
## Detailed Notes
### p.{N}--{M}: {Section Title}
> "{direct quote}" (p.{N})
{analysis and commentary}
## Key Terms
| Term | Translation | Definition in context |
|------|-------------|----------------------|
## Thesis Connections
| Note Point | Chapter | Section | Connection Type |
|------------|---------|---------|-----------------|
## Questions & Follow-ups
- {open questions for future reading}
---
*Last updated: {YYYY-MM-DD}*
When appending to an existing file:
## Detailed Notes, as a new subsection ### p.{N}--{M}: {Title}.## Key Terms table.## Thesis Connections table.## Key Arguments as bullet points.## Questions & Follow-ups.If the section does not exist in the file (e.g., an older file missing ## Thesis Connections), create it.
reading when the file is first created.completed when the user explicitly says they are done with this text (e.g., "done reading", "mark as complete").integrated after /integrate has processed the notes into thesis chapters.Last updated timestamp when modifying a file./integrate completes.literature/reading_notes/ directory relative to the project root.