deep-insight-gap-prioritization

name	deep-insight-gap-prioritization
description	Score and rank validated gaps on importance, feasibility, novelty, and urgency. Multi-criteria decision analysis with stakeholder confirmation.
dependencies	{"tactics":["prioritization-scoring"],"sops":["deep-insight-multi-criteria-scoring","deep-insight-multi-stakeholder-simulation","evidence-grading","stakeholder-confirmation"]}

Gap Prioritization

Score validated gaps and produce a ranked research priority list.

When to Use

Gaps have been validated as genuine — now determine which are most worth pursuing based on multiple criteria and stakeholder perspectives.

Budget

Base SOP	Target	±10% Range
web-search	30	27–33
web-research	10	9–11
paper-overview	20	18–22
paper-search	15	13–17
paper-research	5	4–6

State Ledger

Print before every iteration:

<HARD-GATE>
| SOP | Done | Target | % |
|-----|------|--------|---|
| web-search | ? | 30 | ? |
| web-research | ? | 10 | ? |
| paper-overview | ? | 20 | ? |
| paper-search | ? | 15 | ? |
| paper-research | ? | 5 | ? |
Budget Gate: OPEN/CLOSED (>=80% required to exit)
</HARD-GATE>

Available Tactics

• prioritization-scoring

Available SOPs

Import: web-search, web-research, paper-overview, paper-search, paper-research Subagent: multi-criteria-scoring, stakeholder-confirmation, evidence-grading Shared: multi-stakeholder-simulation

Execution Guidance

Score validated gaps on importance × feasibility × novelty × urgency. Confirm with multi-stakeholder simulation. Produce ranked list with sensitivity analysis (how stable is ranking under different weight schemes?).

Output Format

Ranked Gap List — each gap with: composite score, per-dimension scores, stakeholder consensus level, sensitivity assessment.

Available Tactics

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

Tactic	When to use
prioritization-scoring	Multi-dimensional gap scoring and ranking — define criteria, score, weight, rank, sensitivity-check. Combines multi-criteria-scoring, stakeholder-confirmation, and feasibility assessment.

Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

SOP	When to use
deep-insight-multi-criteria-scoring	Score gaps on multiple dimensions (importance, feasibility, novelty, urgency, impact) using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis.
deep-insight-multi-stakeholder-simulation	Simulate multiple stakeholder perspectives evaluating a research gap, method, or proposal. Identifies blind spots from single-perspective analysis.
evidence-grading	Assess evidence quality using GRADE/SOE framework. Rates certainty level and identifies downgrade reasons.
stakeholder-confirmation	Simulate stakeholder perspectives to validate gap priorities. Assesses gap value from researcher, practitioner, funder, and end-user viewpoints.