メニュー
Strategy for ranking unexplored combinations by novelty, feasibility, and potential impact.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill knowledge-structuring-gap-prioritizationコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
SKILL.md を表示中
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | knowledge-structuring-gap-prioritization |
| description | Strategy for ranking unexplored combinations by novelty, feasibility, and potential impact. |
| execution | strategy |
| dependencies | {"tactics":["axis-extraction","matrix-generation"],"sops":["knowledge-structuring-novelty-scoring","matrix-export","question-generation"]} |
Rank the empty cells (unexplored combinations) by their potential value. Not all gaps are worth filling — prioritize by novelty, feasibility, and expected impact.
An empty cell is only an opportunity if it's feasible and valuable. Rank gaps by: (1) how novel the combination is, (2) how feasible it is to realize, (3) what impact it would have if successful.
| Metric | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaps scored | 3 | 8 | 15 |
| Questions generated | 3 | 8 | 15 |
| Top priorities identified | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Metric | Target | Current | Status |
|---------------------|--------|---------|--------|
| Gaps scored | X | 0 | ⬜ |
| Questions generated | X | 0 | ⬜ |
| Top priorities | X | 0 | ⬜ |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| axis-extraction | Tactic for systematically extracting axes of variation from literature — identify how practitioners compare approaches. |
| matrix-generation | Tactic for generating and populating combination matrices — cross dimensions to enumerate the design space. |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| knowledge-structuring-novelty-scoring | SOP for scoring empty cells by novelty potential — how surprising and valuable would this combination be? |
| matrix-export | SOP for exporting the dimensional matrix as a readable document or structured data. |
| question-generation | SOP for generating research questions from promising gaps in the design space. |