yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine - 11ページ

cross-consistency-filtering

Orchestrates pairwise consistency evaluation and narrative construction to filter the morphological field

原文の言語: 英語

cross-database-verification

Verify gap existence across multiple databases (Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, arXiv, domain-specific). Distinguishes database-specific gaps from universal gaps.

原文の言語: 英語

cross-domain-synthesis

Synthesize all cross-domain findings into a structured idea report. Integrates outputs from all strategies and SOPs.

原文の言語: 英語

cross-examination

Probes defender responses for inconsistencies, logical gaps, and unsupported claims. Acts as follow-up interrogation after initial defense.

原文の言語: 英語

cross-validation

Multi-source cross-validation of gap authenticity — cross-database search, temporal sensitivity testing, false-gap filtering, stakeholder confirmation.

原文の言語: 英語

csh-12-question

Apply Ulrich's Critical Systems Heuristics 12 questions across 4 dimensions (motivation, control, expertise, legitimacy) comparing is vs ought.

原文の言語: 英語

cumulative-tracking

Track evidence accumulation over time — cumulative meta-analysis protocol design. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 30 web searches.

原文の言語: 英語

current-reality-tree

Build TOC Current Reality Trees — connect Undesirable Effects via sufficient-cause logic to identify 1-3 root causes.

原文の言語: 英語

cycle-detection

Scan a pairwise comparison matrix for preference cycles and compute transitivity metrics.

原文の言語: 英語

data-extraction-form

Design structured data extraction form for systematic meta-analysis data collection

原文の言語: 英語

debate-architect

Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters.

原文の言語: 英語

debate-critic

Generates structured criticism from attack stance using Toulmin model. Produces claims, grounds, warrants, and rebuttals targeting artifact weaknesses.

原文の言語: 英語

debate-defender

Responds to attacks with counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Defends artifact using evidence, clarification, and rebuttal while acknowledging valid criticisms.

原文の言語: 英語

debate-judge

Evaluates debate exchanges, adjudicates argument quality, and produces round verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning.

原文の言語: 英語

debate-transcript-analysis

Extracts key turning points, patterns, and insights from completed debate transcripts. Produces structured summary for verdict synthesis.

原文の言語: 英語

decision-sensitivity

Identify which uncertainties would actually change the research direction decision. Compute EVPI to prioritize uncertainty reduction.

原文の言語: 英語

decomposition-formulation

Strategy: decompose a complex research question into a hierarchy of independently answerable sub-questions

原文の言語: 英語

deductive-chain

Derive logical consequences step by step from a given premise, building a traceable derivation chain.

原文の言語: 英語

deductive-hypothesis-generation

Strategy: deduce hypotheses from existing theory

原文の言語: 英語

deep-insight

Deep Insight Engine with 5 campaigns (gap-analysis, insight, boundary-analysis, sensitivity-analysis, problem-reformulation). Use this skill whenever a user needs to deeply analyze research gaps, understand root causes, probe method boundaries, assess…

原文の言語: 英語

deep-survey

Precise, targeted investigation of a specific sub-problem — few papers, all read in full depth. High paper-research ratio (50% deep-read rate). Use when the user knows exactly what they need to understand and requires detailed technical analysis with…

原文の言語: 英語

deep-web-search

Full-page web reading for non-academic perspectives — blogs, tech reports, product pages, industry analysis. Spawns a subagent to read pages in isolated context. Hard constraint: at least 30 web pages read in full.

原文の言語: 英語

define-search-protocol

Formalize search queries and inclusion/exclusion criteria for systematic surveys. Produces a reproducible search protocol document. Used by systematic-survey.

原文の言語: 英語

deliberative-calibration

Strategy for small-N complete pairwise comparison using Bradley-Terry, Thurstone, AHP, and Borda methods to produce calibrated rankings.

原文の言語: 英語

dependency-constraint

What must be completed first? — Dependency chain analysis + prerequisite graph construction

原文の言語: 英語

dependency-graph-construction

Build task dependency graph with predecessor/successor relationships

原文の言語: 英語

dependency-identification

Identify critical dependencies from ablation results, producing a dependency graph and highlighting critical components.

原文の言語: 英語

dependency-sequencing

Determine task dependencies and execution order

原文の言語: 英語

design-by-analogy

Complete DBA process: problem reframe → source search → map → transfer → adapt. Full Design-by-Analogy methodology for systematic analogical design.

原文の言語: 英語

design-fmea

Strategy: Research design-level FMEA — function analysis, failure mode identification, severity/occurrence/detection scoring per AIAG-VDA 2019.

原文の言語: 英語

design-matrix-construction

Build the experiment design matrix with proper orthogonality and balance

原文の言語: 英語

design-space-exploration

Parametric variation + constraint satisfaction combinatorial search

原文の言語: 英語

design-space-mapping

Visualize explored/unexplored regions of solution space

原文の言語: 英語

design-space-visualization

Generate structured description of design space

原文の言語: 英語

destruction-synthesis

Synthesize all assumption destruction outputs into structured destructive innovation report.

原文の言語: 英語

detection-scoring

Rate detectability 1-10 (inverted: 10 = hardest to detect). Estimates how likely current controls would catch the failure before impact.

原文の言語: 英語

devils-advocacy

Construct the strongest possible counter-argument against a position, steelmanning the opposition before attacking.

原文の言語: 英語

dialectical-reformulation

Surface Argyris governing variables and test whether the problem dissolves under alternative governing variables (double-loop learning).

原文の言語: 英語

dialectical-synthesis

Hegelian thesis-antithesis-synthesis cycle — propose position, generate opposition, structured debate, synthesize transcending insight. Combines evaporating-cloud and polarity-mapping SOPs.

原文の言語: 英語

dimension-assessment

Score a single readiness dimension for a candidate with evidence and gap analysis.

原文の言語: 英語