Generate alternative model formulations by relaxing, replacing, or generalizing specific assumptions.
原文の言語: 英語
メニュー
このリポジトリの skills
SkillsMP は yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine から 961 件の skill を収集しています。skill を開くとソースと詳細を確認できます。
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine収集済み skill 961 件中 40 件を表示しています。
Generate alternative model formulations by relaxing, replacing, or generalizing specific assumptions.
原文の言語: 英語
Score each candidate alternative against all criteria to produce a score matrix.
原文の言語: 英語
Generate alternatives for every known approach — ensure no approach goes unchallenged.
原文の言語: 英語
Systematic structure-mapping from source to target domain (Gentner). Identify relational correspondences and transfer higher-order constraints.
原文の言語: 英語
Chain analogies to deeper levels (3-5 layers). Each layer reveals new aspects and insights not visible at the surface.
原文の言語: 英語
Assess analogy depth (surface/structural/systemic). Determines whether an analogy warrants transfer investment.
原文の言語: 英語
KAOS-style recursive goal decomposition. AND decomposition for sub-goals that must ALL be satisfied. OR decomposition for alternative paths where any one suffices. Produces a GoalTree (DAG structure).
原文の言語: 英語
Tactic: Inductive/abductive path — describe anomalous phenomena, generate candidate explanations, rank by plausibility
原文の言語: 英語
Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions. Deconstruct benchmarks to reveal unexamined constraints.
原文の言語: 英語
Search for positive deviants and extract transferable principles using Appreciative Inquiry.
原文の言語: 英語
Find positive deviants and reframe the problem from deficit-based to asset-based using Appreciative Inquiry.
原文の言語: 英語
Establish acceptability standards through RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method or Consensus Conference protocols.
原文の言語: 英語
Distill the strongest arguments from each perspective through Argument Delphi or Dialectical Delphi methods.
原文の言語: 英語
Extract and steel-man the core arguments supporting a given opinion cluster.
原文の言語: 英語
Strategy for synthesizing argument positions — aggregate evidence, resolve contradictions, produce synthesis reports identifying which claims survive scrutiny.
原文の言語: 英語
Rate each identified obstacle's difficulty — overcomability, time cost, workaround existence. May optionally use search tools to validate assessments.
原文の言語: 英語
Standardize assignee names and identify corporate group affiliations across patent offices
原文の言語: 英語
Surface all assumptions, classify by vulnerability (load-bearing × likely-false), validate causal logic. Focus on dangerous assumptions — high load-bearing + non-explicit.
原文の言語: 英語
Tactic: Surface assumptions, sort by dependency, attack root assumptions first, then trace cascade failures through the dependency graph.
原文の言語: 英語
Build assumption dependency graphs and trace cascade failures when root assumptions are invalidated.
原文の言語: 英語
Challenge each assumption's validity — shared cross-repo SOP
原文の言語: 英語
Which assumptions are most fragile? — Vulnerability ranking + impact assessment of experiment assumptions
原文の言語: 英語
Measure how much conclusions change when each assumption is negated. Ranks assumptions by their impact on the final result.
原文の言語: 英語
Systematic extraction, challenge, and sensitivity analysis of assumptions underlying a decision to identify load-bearing beliefs.
原文の言語: 英語
Classic reductio ad absurdum: negate the core claim, derive logical consequences, seek contradiction or absurdity.
原文の言語: 英語
Systematic stress testing of assumptions — surface, classify by vulnerability, attack, assess fragility. Combines assumption-surfacing (shared), abp-vulnerability-classification, and clr-validation SOPs.
原文の言語: 英語
Compute overall resilience score (0.0-1.0) based on attack results, coverage, and vulnerability severity distribution.
原文の言語: 英語
Generate specific attack strategies for a given threat surface, producing concrete probes that can be executed.
原文の言語: 英語
Identify and suspend fundamental assumptions via de Bono PO. Systematically negate axioms to reveal hidden solution spaces.
原文の言語: 英語
Tactic for systematically extracting axes of variation from literature — identify how practitioners compare approaches.
原文の言語: 英語
Gather independent ranking ballots from multiple judges or perspectives for a given candidate set.
原文の言語: 英語
Select appropriate baselines for experimental comparison
原文の言語: 英語
Systematic quality assessment using BetterBench 46-criterion framework — 5 benchmarks, 30 papers, 40 web searches
原文の言語: 英語
Identify and negate benchmark assumptions. Deconstruct best practices to reveal hidden constraints and open new spaces.
原文の言語: 英語
Systematically scan all known solutions, identify gaps in coverage and unexplored regions of the solution space.
原文の言語: 英語
Produce final structured audit report
原文の言語: 英語
Select the single best candidate from a set using WSM, TOPSIS, AHP, MAUT, or VIKOR methods.
原文の言語: 英語
Assess systematic biases in the evidence body — publication bias, reporting bias, and selective outcome reporting. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 40 web searches.
原文の言語: 英語
Map technical functions to biological systems. Orchestrates problem-biologization → organism-discovery → functional-model-biology.
原文の言語: 英語
Extract strategy principles from organisms. Identify mechanism-level details of how biological systems achieve their function.
原文の言語: 英語