ワンクリックで
twitter-threads
Craft high-performing X/Twitter threads with viral lead tweets, strong transitions, and algorithm-optimized structure.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Craft high-performing X/Twitter threads with viral lead tweets, strong transitions, and algorithm-optimized structure.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Systematically analyze competitor content strategies, identify gaps and opportunities, and turn findings into actionable content angles.
Extract atomic ideas from long-form content and systematically transform them into 8-12 platform-specific derivative pieces.
Write high-performing LinkedIn posts with platform-native formatting, hook patterns, and algorithm-aligned structure.
Write high-performing email newsletters with compelling subject lines, optimized pacing, and subscriber retention strategies for Substack, Beehiiv, and ConvertKit.
Build a founder's personal brand with build-in-public content, founder journey storytelling, and the right balance between personal and company narratives.
Develop original perspectives, contrarian takes, and opinion-driven content that establishes authority and sparks conversation.
| name | twitter-threads |
| description | Craft high-performing X/Twitter threads with viral lead tweets, strong transitions, and algorithm-optimized structure. |
Use this skill when creating X (formerly Twitter) threads — multi-tweet sequences that tell a story, teach a concept, or build an argument. Threads consistently outperform single tweets by 2–5x in impressions and drive significantly more profile visits and follows. This skill covers thread architecture, lead tweet hooks, tweet-to-tweet flow, and the specific engagement mechanics that X's algorithm rewards in 2026.
X's algorithm uses a multi-factor ranking system. For threads specifically:
The lead tweet determines whether anyone reads the rest. It must work as a standalone piece of content that also creates a reason to keep reading.
1. The Big Claim
I spent 6 months studying the top 1% of [niche].
Here are 9 patterns they all share:
🧵👇
2. The Contrarian Setup
Everyone tells you to [common advice].
That advice is costing you [specific loss].
Here's what actually works (thread):
3. The Story Opener
In 2023, I was [specific bad situation].
12 months later, I [specific good result].
Here's the exact playbook:
4. The Surprising Fact
[Specific surprising stat or fact].
Most people don't know this because [reason].
Let me break it down:
5. The Resource Thread
I've tested 50+ [tools/strategies/frameworks] for [outcome].
Here are the 7 that actually work (saving you months of trial and error):
6. The Prediction
[Industry/niche] is about to change dramatically.
3 shifts most people aren't seeing yet:
Poor transitions kill thread completion rates. Each tweet must accomplish two things: deliver value AND create a reason to read the next tweet.
1. The Cliffhanger Bridge
Tweet 4: "But there's a problem most people miss..."
Tweet 5: "The problem is [explanation]..."
2. The Numbered Progression
Tweet 3: "2/ The second principle is [X]..."
Tweet 4: "3/ This one surprised me the most..."
3. The "But Here's the Thing" Bridge
Tweet 5: "...and that's what most people do."
Tweet 6: "But here's what separates the top performers..."
4. The Escalation
Tweet 6: "That alone would be enough. But it gets better."
Tweet 7: "[Even more valuable insight]"
5. The Direct Link
Tweet 3: "...which brings us to the real question:"
Tweet 4: "[The real question and answer]"
| Thread Type | Optimal Length | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Listicle / tips | 7–10 tweets | One tip per tweet, easy to scan |
| Story / narrative | 5–8 tweets | Tight storytelling, no filler |
| Framework / how-to | 8–12 tweets | Step-by-step, include examples |
| Curated resources | 5–7 tweets | 1–2 resources per tweet with commentary |
| Hot take / argument | 4–6 tweets | Tight logic, land the point fast |
General rule: Every tweet must earn its place. If you can cut a tweet without losing meaning, cut it. Padding destroys completion rates.
Two schools, both valid:
1/ Lead tweet with hook
2/ First point with detail
3/ Second point...
Lead tweet (no number)
Next tweet continues the narrative...
Next tweet builds the argument...
Recommendation: Use numbers for educational/list threads. Skip numbers for story/opinion threads.
Each tweet delivers complete value on its own. If someone sees tweet #5 in their feed (via a like or retweet), it still makes sense and is useful.
Best for: Tip threads, resource lists, quote collections Example: "Tip 4: Never send a cold email longer than 125 words. The data shows reply rates drop 50% after that threshold."
Each tweet builds on the previous one. You must read from the beginning.
Best for: Stories, arguments, frameworks, tutorials Example: "So I took that feedback and completely rebuilt the pitch deck..."
Recommendation: Default to standalone structure unless you're telling a story. Standalone tweets get more individual engagement because each tweet works in isolation when it appears in feeds.
Include one tweet in your thread that's designed to be quote-tweeted:
Signal to readers that the thread is worth saving:
Ask a specific question that's easy and fun to answer:
Reply to your own thread 30–60 minutes after posting with:
Even with 280 characters per tweet (free) or 25,000 (Premium), respect reader attention:
🧵 LEAD TWEET
[Big claim or hook — 200-250 chars]
[Thread indicator]
TWEET 2
[Context or "why this matters"]
[Bridge to next tweet]
TWEETS 3–N (body)
[One key point per tweet]
[Evidence, example, or story]
[Transition to next]
SECOND-TO-LAST TWEET
[Your strongest or most surprising point — save something powerful for near the end]
FINAL TWEET
[Recap the core takeaway in 1-2 sentences]
[CTA: Follow for more, bookmark, drop your take]
[Optional: retweet the lead tweet to boost it]
Before publishing any X thread, verify: