risk-assessment

id	SKL-risk-RISKASSESSMENT
name	Risk Assessment
description	Risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating potential risks that could affect project success, system stability, or business operations. This skill provides frame
version	1.0.0
status	active
owner	@cerebra-team
last_updated	2026-02-22
category	Backend
tags	["api","backend","server","database"]
stack	["Python","Node.js","REST API","GraphQL"]
difficulty	Intermediate

Risk Assessment

Skill Profile

(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)

• DevOps
• Backend
• Frontend
• AI-RAG
• Security Critical

Overview

Risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating potential risks that could affect project success, system stability, or business operations. This skill provides frameworks and methodologies for effective risk management, including risk identification, analysis, prioritization, mitigation planning, and continuous monitoring. It enables teams to proactively address potential issues before they materialize, reducing likelihood and impact of incidents.

Why This Matters

• Prevents Incidents: Proactively identifying risks reduces likelihood and severity of system failures
• Reduces Development Time: Addressing risks early prevents costly rework and emergency fixes
• Increases Confidence: Stakeholders gain trust when risks are well-managed
• Protects Investment: Risk mitigation preserves value of technical investments
• Improves Planning: Understanding risks enables more accurate project planning and resource allocation

---

Core Concepts & Rules

1. Core Principles

• Follow established patterns and conventions
• Maintain consistency across codebase
• Document decisions and trade-offs

2. Implementation Guidelines

• Start with the simplest viable solution
• Iterate based on feedback and requirements
• Test thoroughly before deployment

Inputs / Outputs / Contracts

• Inputs:
  • Project requirements and scope
  • Technical architecture documents
  • Historical incident data
  • Team expertise and knowledge
  • Stakeholder concerns and constraints
• Entry Conditions:
  • Project or initiative is defined
  • Stakeholders are available for consultation
  • Historical data is accessible
• Outputs:
  • Risk register with all identified risks
  • Risk analysis with scores and prioritization
  • Mitigation plans for prioritized risks
  • Contingency plans for critical risks
  • Monitoring and review schedule
• Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
  • Risk register document
  • Risk assessment matrix
  • Mitigation action plans
  • Contingency plans
• Acceptance Evidence:
  • Risk register reviewed and approved by stakeholders
  • Mitigation plans assigned with owners and deadlines
  • Monitoring schedule established
• Success Criteria:
  • All critical risks have mitigation plans
  • Risk register is complete and up-to-date
  • Stakeholders are aware of key risks
  • Monitoring process is active

Skill Composition

• Depends on: architectural-reviews, system-thinking
• Compatible with: decision-records, technical-debt-management
• Conflicts with: None
• Related Skills: problem-framing, code-review

---

Quick Start / Implementation Example

1. Review requirements and constraints
2. Set up development environment
3. Implement core functionality following patterns
4. Write tests for critical paths
5. Run tests and fix issues
6. Document any deviations or decisions

# Example implementation following best practices
def example_function():
    # Your implementation here
    pass

Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals

• Assumptions:
  • Development environment is properly configured
  • Required dependencies are available
  • Team has basic understanding of domain
• Constraints:
  • Must follow existing codebase conventions
  • Time and resource limitations
  • Compatibility requirements
• Non-goals:
  • This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
  • Not a replacement for formal training

Compatibility & Prerequisites

• Supported Versions:
  • Python 3.8+
  • Node.js 16+
  • Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
• Required AI Tools:
  • Code editor (VS Code recommended)
  • Testing framework appropriate for language
  • Version control (Git)
• Dependencies:
  • Language-specific package manager
  • Build tools
  • Testing libraries
• Environment Setup:
  • .env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)

Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)

Type	Focus Area	Required Scenarios / Mocks
Unit	Core Logic	Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage
Integration	DB / API	All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests
E2E	User Journey	Critical user flows to test
Performance	Latency / Load	Benchmark requirements
Security	Vuln / Auth	SAST/DAST or dependency audit
Frontend	UX / A11y	Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score)

Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model

1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)

• Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure

• Data Handling: Sanitize all user inputs to prevent Injection attacks. Never log raw PII
• Secrets Management: No hardcoded API keys. Use Env Vars/Secrets Manager
• Authorization: Validate user permissions before state changes

2. Performance & Resources

• Execution Efficiency: Consider time complexity for algorithms
• Memory Management: Use streams/pagination for large data
• Resource Cleanup: Close DB connections/file handlers in finally blocks

3. Architecture & Scalability

• Design Pattern: Follow SOLID principles, use Dependency Injection
• Modularity: Decouple logic from UI/Frameworks

4. Observability & Reliability

• Logging Standards: Structured JSON, include trace IDs request_id
• Metrics: Track error_rate, latency, queue_depth
• Error Handling: Standardized error codes, no bare except
• Observability Artifacts:
  • Log Fields: timestamp, level, message, request_id
  • Metrics: request_count, error_count, response_time
  • Dashboards/Alerts: High Error Rate > 5%

Agent Directives & Error Recovery

(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)

• Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
• Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
• Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
• Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.

Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist

• Tests passed + coverage met
• Lint/Typecheck passed
• Logging/Metrics/Trace implemented
• Security checks passed
• Documentation/Changelog updated
• Accessibility/Performance requirements met (if frontend)

Anti-patterns / Pitfalls

• ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
• ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
• 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging

Reference Links & Examples

• Internal documentation and examples
• Official documentation and best practices
• Community resources and discussions

Versioning & Changelog

• Version: 1.0.0
• Changelog:
  • 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure