// analyze academic reviews and draft a professional rebuttal when the input includes reviewer comments, a meta-review, paper abstract, or user supplied experiment status and the user needs concern classification, response strategy, risk warnings, or a rebuttal draft without inventing evidence.
extract structured benchmark information from academic papers when the input includes multiple pdfs, abstracts, or links and the user needs chinese notes or table-ready fields for tasks, datasets, metrics, baselines, sota claims, code release, or evaluation settings.
summarize machine learning experiment logs in chinese when the input includes training logs, eval results, hyperparameter changes, user notes, or multiple runs and the user needs a grounded experiment summary, error analysis, best configuration recap, or a weekly update ready abstract.
produce a chinese deep reading note for a single academic paper when the input is a pdf, arxiv link, title with abstract, or paper excerpts and the user needs a grounded reading card, contribution summary, reproduction risks, or reading priority judgment.
monitor recent arxiv papers and produce a chinese digest when the user needs a filtered paper watchlist, a ranked update for agent or rag related topics, or an optional feishu webhook push from recent cs.ai or cs.cl submissions.
analyze topic coverage, bottlenecks, controversies, and plausible research gaps when the input includes a research topic, a set of papers, or the user's early ideas and the user needs a grounded gap analysis, problem framing, small entry points, or experiment hypotheses without forced novelty claims.
write a chinese survey draft around a research topic when the input includes a topic, multiple papers, abstracts, links, pdfs, or a user curated related-work list and the user needs a short survey, long survey, taxonomy, or method evolution summary.
| name | review-rebuttal |
| description | analyze academic reviews and draft a professional rebuttal when the input includes reviewer comments, a meta-review, paper abstract, or user supplied experiment status and the user needs concern classification, response strategy, risk warnings, or a rebuttal draft without inventing evidence. |
用这个 skill 处理投稿后的 reviewer comments、meta-review 和 rebuttal 草稿。重点是拆 concerns、区分补实验与澄清项、组织回复策略，并保持专业克制的语气。
references/review_taxonomy.md 给 concern 分类。references/tone_guidelines.md 约束语气和风险表达。references/rebuttal_template.md 生成回复框架和草稿。references/rebuttal_template.md。references/review_taxonomy.md。references/tone_guidelines.md。