review-lesson

name	review-lesson
description	Review a lesson for accuracy against Claude Code docs
argument-hint	<lesson-file or number>

Review Lesson

Review the lesson $ARGUMENTS for accuracy against official Claude Code documentation.

Steps

1. Read the lesson

   • If a number is given (e.g., "04"), read learn-claude/04-*.md
   • If a file path is given, read that file

2. Check against official docs

   • Fetch https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code for reference
   • Also check https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/cli-usage
   • Cross-reference any claims in the lesson

3. Review for

   • Accuracy - Is the information correct?
   • Completeness - Is anything important missing?
   • Currency - Is anything outdated?
   • Clarity - Is it easy to understand?

Output Format

## Lesson Review: [Title]

### Accuracy

- ✅ Correct: [list accurate claims]
- ❌ Incorrect: [list inaccuracies with corrections]
- ⚠️ Outdated: [list outdated info with updates]

### Missing

- [Important topics not covered]

### Suggestions

- [Improvements to make]

### Verdict

[PASS / NEEDS UPDATES / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED]

Guidelines

• Be specific about what's wrong and how to fix it
• Reference the official docs for corrections
• Note if something couldn't be verified
• Prioritize factual accuracy over style